911 WTC 7 Silent Thermate Demolition, Debunkers Grab Your Ankles!

[n0spam4me]

"How many floors needed to burn uncontrollably to weaken the structure? And you didn't answer my question ... if it was going to fall, how should it have fallen?"

The "how should it have fallen" is a speculation trap, the problem here is that the what that it allegedly fell, because of fire, is totally improbable.
The fact that WTC7 fell for 2.25 sec at free fall acceleration is quite significant in that for anything to fall at free fall acceleration it must not have any resistance under it. so how did it happen in response to chaotic fire(s) that ALL of the resistance was removed and all at the same time out from under the North & West walls of the tower?

Your entire post is based on false premises. First, that it's improbable for a 47 story building with fires burning uncontrollably for 7 hours to collapse as though it's impossible. But even more to point to a 2.25 second period of free fall with no resistance as though the interior of the building hadn't already collapsed, removing said resistance.

so your interpretation of the events includes the possibility & probability that structural elements of WTC7 could fail in such a manner as to remove ALL support from under the West & North walls all at the same time. (?) Right?

 

[n0spam4me]

"It would be very significant if true. More like 13.5 sec for total collapse."

It is true, a measured 2.25 sec of free fall acceleration
and this clearly indicates that the falling bit had absolutely nothing under it. just exactly how is that arranged, that is the complete & total removal of all structure out from under the West & North walls of WTC7?

 

[Faun]

"How many floors needed to burn uncontrollably to weaken the structure? And you didn't answer my question ... if it was going to fall, how should it have fallen?"

The "how should it have fallen" is a speculation trap, the problem here is that the what that it allegedly fell, because of fire, is totally improbable.
The fact that WTC7 fell for 2.25 sec at free fall acceleration is quite significant in that for anything to fall at free fall acceleration it must not have any resistance under it. so how did it happen in response to chaotic fire(s) that ALL of the resistance was removed and all at the same time out from under the North & West walls of the tower?

Your entire post is based on false premises. First, that it's improbable for a 47 story building with fires burning uncontrollably for 7 hours to collapse as though it's impossible. But even more to point to a 2.25 second period of free fall with no resistance as though the interior of the building hadn't already collapsed, removing said resistance.

so your interpretation of the events includes the possibility & probability that structural elements of WTC7 could fail in such a manner as to remove ALL support from under the West & North walls all at the same time. (?) Right?

And yet, that is how the building fell.

 

[Faun]

"It would be very significant if true. More like 13.5 sec for total collapse."

It is true, a measured 2.25 sec of free fall acceleration
and this clearly indicates that the falling bit had absolutely nothing under it. just exactly how is that arranged, that is the complete & total removal of all structure out from under the West & North walls of WTC7?

It took more like 14 seconds for the building to collapse and the 2 second period you're focusing on came after much of the building already collapsed.

 

[n0spam4me]

"It would be very significant if true. More like 13.5 sec for total collapse."

It is true, a measured 2.25 sec of free fall acceleration
and this clearly indicates that the falling bit had absolutely nothing under it. just exactly how is that arranged, that is the complete & total removal of all structure out from under the West & North walls of WTC7?

It took more like 14 seconds for the building to collapse and the 2 second period you're focusing on came after much of the building already collapsed.

an attempt to negate the significance of 2.25 sec of free fall acceleration.
The free fall acceleration is significant and its as much as putting up a billboard saying THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION!

 

[Faun]

"It would be very significant if true. More like 13.5 sec for total collapse."

It is true, a measured 2.25 sec of free fall acceleration
and this clearly indicates that the falling bit had absolutely nothing under it. just exactly how is that arranged, that is the complete & total removal of all structure out from under the West & North walls of WTC7?

It took more like 14 seconds for the building to collapse and the 2 second period you're focusing on came after much of the building already collapsed.

an attempt to negate the significance of 2.25 sec of free fall acceleration.
The free fall acceleration is significant and its as much as putting up a billboard saying THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION!

Again, much of the building already collapsed before that 2.25 second period. By that point, there was nothing left to hold the building up.

 

[Freewill]

"It would be very significant if true. More like 13.5 sec for total collapse."

It is true, a measured 2.25 sec of free fall acceleration
and this clearly indicates that the falling bit had absolutely nothing under it. just exactly how is that arranged, that is the complete & total removal of all structure out from under the West & North walls of WTC7?

It took more like 14 seconds for the building to collapse and the 2 second period you're focusing on came after much of the building already collapsed.

an attempt to negate the significance of 2.25 sec of free fall acceleration.
The free fall acceleration is significant and its as much as putting up a billboard saying THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION!

Could you at least list your credentials that qualifies you to make such an assessment.

 

[Skylar]

"How many floors needed to burn uncontrollably to weaken the structure? And you didn't answer my question ... if it was going to fall, how should it have fallen?"

The "how should it have fallen" is a speculation trap, the problem here is that the what that it allegedly fell, because of fire, is totally improbable.
The fact that WTC7 fell for 2.25 sec at free fall acceleration is quite significant in that for anything to fall at free fall acceleration it must not have any resistance under it. so how did it happen in response to chaotic fire(s) that ALL of the resistance was removed and all at the same time out from under the North & West walls of the tower?

Your entire post is based on false premises. First, that it's improbable for a 47 story building with fires burning uncontrollably for 7 hours to collapse as though it's impossible. But even more to point to a 2.25 second period of free fall with no resistance as though the interior of the building hadn't already collapsed, removing said resistance.

so your interpretation of the events includes the possibility & probability that structural elements of WTC7 could fail in such a manner as to remove ALL support from under the West & North walls all at the same time. (?) Right?

Per the NIST, the collapse initiated on the 13th floor. The center collapsed first, which you refuse to acknowledge. And the facade fell next, at least 19 seconds after the center of the building had collapsed.

Beams are designed to support each other. When one fails, the load energy is transferred to neighboring supports. Its only when the last support fails or there are no more beams to transfer load energy that the structure falls. And this happens *remarkably* quickly. If the 13th floor collapsed, all floors above it would fall simultaneously. Which is exactly what we saw.

And of course, we've already ruled out bombs as the cause. As there were no bombs, the initiation of the collapse of WTC 7 was virtually silent and there are no 'silent bombs', the building was on fire and would have melted any bombs and their apparatus, there were no girders cut in a manner consistent with bombs, the Port Authority Bomb Squad had already gone through the entire WTC plaza a week before and found no bombs.

Your story doesn't work. Get used to the idea. Trying to insinuate a conspiracy you know you can't factually support is an excuse for an argument.

 

[daws101]

"It would be very significant if true. More like 13.5 sec for total collapse."

It is true, a measured 2.25 sec of free fall acceleration
and this clearly indicates that the falling bit had absolutely nothing under it. just exactly how is that arranged, that is the complete & total removal of all structure out from under the West & North walls of WTC7?

It took more like 14 seconds for the building to collapse and the 2 second period you're focusing on came after much of the building already collapsed.

an attempt to negate the significance of 2.25 sec of free fall acceleration.
The free fall acceleration is significant and its as much as putting up a billboard saying THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION!

Could you at least list your credentials that qualifies you to make such an assessment.

a dick gage fan club card will not cut it.

 

[Rozman]

Not at all true....
They used the extra loud ones...
You can get them in Chinatown....

 

[SFC Ollie]

"It would be very significant if true. More like 13.5 sec for total collapse."

It is true, a measured 2.25 sec of free fall acceleration
and this clearly indicates that the falling bit had absolutely nothing under it. just exactly how is that arranged, that is the complete & total removal of all structure out from under the West & North walls of WTC7?

It took more like 14 seconds for the building to collapse and the 2 second period you're focusing on came after much of the building already collapsed.

an attempt to negate the significance of 2.25 sec of free fall acceleration.
The free fall acceleration is significant and its as much as putting up a billboard saying THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION!

This has been explained so many times that a 6 year old can understand it, You cannot count 2.5 seconds of the facade falling as the entire building. At least 16 seconds before that visible roofline started to move the interior of the building had collapsed and left nothing standing behind that facade. Anyone who watches the entire building collapse instead of picking it up after the east penthouse disappears can see it....

 

[daws101]

"How many floors needed to burn uncontrollably to weaken the structure? And you didn't answer my question ... if it was going to fall, how should it have fallen?"

The "how should it have fallen" is a speculation trap, the problem here is that the what that it allegedly fell, because of fire, is totally improbable.
The fact that WTC7 fell for 2.25 sec at free fall acceleration is quite significant in that for anything to fall at free fall acceleration it must not have any resistance under it. so how did it happen in response to chaotic fire(s) that ALL of the resistance was removed and all at the same time out from under the North & West walls of the tower?

Your entire post is based on false premises. First, that it's improbable for a 47 story building with fires burning uncontrollably for 7 hours to collapse as though it's impossible. But even more to point to a 2.25 second period of free fall with no resistance as though the interior of the building hadn't already collapsed, removing said resistance.

so your interpretation of the events includes the possibility & probability that structural elements of WTC7 could fail in such a manner as to remove ALL support from under the West & North walls all at the same time. (?) Right?

Per the NIST, the collapse initiated on the 13th floor. The center collapsed first, which you refuse to acknowledge. And the facade fell next, at least 19 seconds after the center of the building had collapsed.

Beams are designed to support each other. When one fails, the load energy is transferred to neighboring supports. Its only when the last support fails or there are no more beams to transfer load energy that the structure falls. And this happens *remarkably* quickly. If the 13th floor collapsed, all floors above it would fall simultaneously. Which is exactly what we saw.

And of course, we've already ruled out bombs as the cause. As there were no bombs, the initiation of the collapse of WTC 7 was virtually silent and there are no 'silent bombs', the building was on fire and would have melted any bombs and their apparatus, there were no girders cut in a manner consistent with bombs, the Port Authority Bomb Squad had already gone through the entire WTC plaza a week before and found no bombs.

Your story doesn't work. Get used to the idea. Trying to insinuate a conspiracy you know you can't factually support is an excuse for an argument.

"It would be very significant if true. More like 13.5 sec for total collapse."

It is true, a measured 2.25 sec of free fall acceleration
and this clearly indicates that the falling bit had absolutely nothing under it. just exactly how is that arranged, that is the complete & total removal of all structure out from under the West & North walls of WTC7?

It took more like 14 seconds for the building to collapse and the 2 second period you're focusing on came after much of the building already collapsed.

an attempt to negate the significance of 2.25 sec of free fall acceleration.
The free fall acceleration is significant and its as much as putting up a billboard saying THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION!

This has been explained so many times that a 6 year old can understand it, You cannot count 2.5 seconds of the facade falling as the entire building. At least 16 seconds before that visible roofline started to move the interior of the building had collapsed and left nothing standing behind that facade. Anyone who watches the entire building collapse instead of picking it up after the east penthouse disappears can see it....

not that!

 

[Gary Anderson]

now this is hilarious!

not even the debunker trolls want to stick their neck out on this one.

gotta love it when truthers present an unimpeachable case.

Relax, chuckles. Your conspiracy was already proven impossible 6 times over.

Read above.

Sorry, 9/11 was a conspiracy. Cheney had both motive and knowledge and I can prove it. And, WTC7 was identical to implosions. And, squibs were observed in all three buildings.

 

[n0spam4me]

Could you at least list your credentials that qualifies you to make such an assessment.

Certainly, I'm a sentient being, 1 ea. earthling type.
that is all that is required to be able to see that 9/11/2001 = False Flag operation.

 

[Gary Anderson]

"It would be very significant if true. More like 13.5 sec for total collapse."

It is true, a measured 2.25 sec of free fall acceleration
and this clearly indicates that the falling bit had absolutely nothing under it. just exactly how is that arranged, that is the complete & total removal of all structure out from under the West & North walls of WTC7?

It took more like 14 seconds for the building to collapse and the 2 second period you're focusing on came after much of the building already collapsed.

an attempt to negate the significance of 2.25 sec of free fall acceleration.
The free fall acceleration is significant and its as much as putting up a billboard saying THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION!

This has been explained so many times that a 6 year old can understand it, You cannot count 2.5 seconds of the facade falling as the entire building. At least 16 seconds before that visible roofline started to move the interior of the building had collapsed and left nothing standing behind that facade. Anyone who watches the entire building collapse instead of picking it up after the east penthouse disappears can see it....

Quit deluding yourself. There was no time to pancake WTC7. There was no evidence of a successful pancaking of an entire skyscraper anyway. And three buildings went down by fire on the same day when that doesn't happen? I have some marshland in Florida I can sell lyou cheaply.

 

[Freewill]

"It would be very significant if true. More like 13.5 sec for total collapse."

It is true, a measured 2.25 sec of free fall acceleration
and this clearly indicates that the falling bit had absolutely nothing under it. just exactly how is that arranged, that is the complete & total removal of all structure out from under the West & North walls of WTC7?

It took more like 14 seconds for the building to collapse and the 2 second period you're focusing on came after much of the building already collapsed.

an attempt to negate the significance of 2.25 sec of free fall acceleration.
The free fall acceleration is significant and its as much as putting up a billboard saying THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION!

This has been explained so many times that a 6 year old can understand it, You cannot count 2.5 seconds of the facade falling as the entire building. At least 16 seconds before that visible roofline started to move the interior of the building had collapsed and left nothing standing behind that facade. Anyone who watches the entire building collapse instead of picking it up after the east penthouse disappears can see it....

Quit deluding yourself. There was no time to pancake WTC7. There was no evidence of a successful pancaking of an entire skyscraper anyway. And three buildings went down by fire on the same day when that doesn't happen? I have some marshland in Florida I can sell lyou cheaply.

What do you mean it doesn't happen? It happened 3 times on 9/11. What hasn't happened is two building being struck by two airliners.

 

[Freewill]

Could you at least list your credentials that qualifies you to make such an assessment.

Certainly, I'm a sentient being, 1 ea. earthling type.
that is all that is required to be able to see that 9/11/2001 = False Flag operation.

Certainly, everyone who does not agree with you are "sentient" beings, many Earthling types.

Logic and common sense are really all that is required to see that the 9/11 truthers are about anything but the truth.

 

[n0spam4me]

Could you at least list your credentials that qualifies you to make such an assessment.

Certainly, I'm a sentient being, 1 ea. earthling type.
that is all that is required to be able to see that 9/11/2001 = False Flag operation.

Certainly, everyone who does not agree with you are "sentient" beings, many Earthling types.

Logic and common sense are really all that is required to see that the 9/11 truthers are about anything but the truth.

So for those who care about the truth, please enlighten me as to exactly how it was documented, that is what remained of each airliner that is the alleged "FLT11", :"FLT175", "FLT77". & "FLT93" ?

where are the airplanes? You don't just make tons of aircraft disappear as if you had Harry Potters wand, aircraft wreckage doesn't just evaporate....

 

[n0spam4me]

Not at all true....
They used the extra loud ones...
You can get them in Chinatown....

Satisfy my curiosity ...... what is this in reference to?

 

[Gary Anderson]

"How many floors needed to burn uncontrollably to weaken the structure? And you didn't answer my question ... if it was going to fall, how should it have fallen?"

The "how should it have fallen" is a speculation trap, the problem here is that the what that it allegedly fell, because of fire, is totally improbable.
The fact that WTC7 fell for 2.25 sec at free fall acceleration is quite significant in that for anything to fall at free fall acceleration it must not have any resistance under it. so how did it happen in response to chaotic fire(s) that ALL of the resistance was removed and all at the same time out from under the North & West walls of the tower?

Your entire post is based on false premises. First, that it's improbable for a 47 story building with fires burning uncontrollably for 7 hours to collapse as though it's impossible. But even more to point to a 2.25 second period of free fall with no resistance as though the interior of the building hadn't already collapsed, removing said resistance.

so your interpretation of the events includes the possibility & probability that structural elements of WTC7 could fail in such a manner as to remove ALL support from under the West & North walls all at the same time. (?) Right?

Per the NIST, the collapse initiated on the 13th floor. The center collapsed first, which you refuse to acknowledge. And the facade fell next, at least 19 seconds after the center of the building had collapsed.

Beams are designed to support each other. When one fails, the load energy is transferred to neighboring supports. Its only when the last support fails or there are no more beams to transfer load energy that the structure falls. And this happens *remarkably* quickly. If the 13th floor collapsed, all floors above it would fall simultaneously. Which is exactly what we saw.

And of course, we've already ruled out bombs as the cause. As there were no bombs, the initiation of the collapse of WTC 7 was virtually silent and there are no 'silent bombs', the building was on fire and would have melted any bombs and their apparatus, there were no girders cut in a manner consistent with bombs, the Port Authority Bomb Squad had already gone through the entire WTC plaza a week before and found no bombs.

Your story doesn't work. Get used to the idea. Trying to insinuate a conspiracy you know you can't factually support is an excuse for an argument.

A blind man can see with his cane that the NIST is lying.