911 Reality vs Myth

[skookerasbil]

And there were, at least, some partial remains identified for each of the 40 people who died on the ground in the field in PA. And that was a contained area of open ground

Not according to the initial report of the CORONER.... who later changed his story to fit the Zionist bullshit.

Where are the bodies and parts of the plane??





Exactly as the coroner initially posted

someone had dug a ditch, filled it with metal junk, and set it on fire.

There were no bodies, so I clocked out....

In most plane crashes, the pilot is trying to avoid crashing. In this one, it was intentional. The plane hit the ground at 500+ mph.

And the bodies were mangled and burned. But most of the families received personal effects from the wreckage. Not to mention the phone calls from the flight. Do you think the gov't faked 26 phone calls from people to their loved ones? Or do you think the families of those who died in the crash went along with the charade after their loved ones were murdered?

There were body PARTS.

Doy

Post up some other photos of plane crashes with zero wreckage! Good luck and God bless!

 

[skookerasbil]

And there were, at least, some partial remains identified for each of the 40 people who died on the ground in the field in PA. And that was a contained area of open ground

Not according to the initial report of the CORONER.... who later changed his story to fit the Zionist bullshit.

Where are the bodies and parts of the plane??





Exactly as the coroner initially posted

someone had dug a ditch, filled it with metal junk, and set it on fire.

There were no bodies, so I clocked out....

In most plane crashes, the pilot is trying to avoid crashing. In this one, it was intentional. The plane hit the ground at 500+ mph.

And the bodies were mangled and burned. But most of the families received personal effects from the wreckage. Not to mention the phone calls from the flight. Do you think the gov't faked 26 phone calls from people to their loved ones? Or do you think the families of those who died in the crash went along with the charade after their loved ones were murdered?

There were body PARTS.

Of course, why fake the phone calls? You have to get an actress or actor to make the completely unnecessary call. And if the goal was to get us into Iraq, why not have the phone calls implicate Saddam?

Duh

You are the kind of sucker, like Winterborn, to automatically think the Muhammad Atta photo is authentic.....same as the phone calls. Two 100 story skyscrapers just disappear....no wreckage after the collapse! Fire in the basement of the towers burns FOR WEEKS!!

Or the shotgun in the glovebox of Adam Lanza's Honda Civic.....front windows being shot out with .223 rounds but no damage to the wall 30 feet behind. You suckers will believe any "official" report.

 

[Faun]

And there were, at least, some partial remains identified for each of the 40 people who died on the ground in the field in PA. And that was a contained area of open ground

Not according to the initial report of the CORONER.... who later changed his story to fit the Zionist bullshit.

Where are the bodies and parts of the plane??





Exactly as the coroner initially posted

someone had dug a ditch, filled it with metal junk, and set it on fire.

There were no bodies, so I clocked out....

In most plane crashes, the pilot is trying to avoid crashing. In this one, it was intentional. The plane hit the ground at 500+ mph.

And the bodies were mangled and burned. But most of the families received personal effects from the wreckage. Not to mention the phone calls from the flight. Do you think the gov't faked 26 phone calls from people to their loved ones? Or do you think the families of those who died in the crash went along with the charade after their loved ones were murdered?

There were body PARTS.

Doy

Post up some other photos of plane crashes with zero wreckage! Good luck and God bless!

ValueJet #592

 

[skookerasbil]

And there were, at least, some partial remains identified for each of the 40 people who died on the ground in the field in PA. And that was a contained area of open ground

Not according to the initial report of the CORONER.... who later changed his story to fit the Zionist bullshit.

Where are the bodies and parts of the plane??





Exactly as the coroner initially posted

someone had dug a ditch, filled it with metal junk, and set it on fire.

There were no bodies, so I clocked out....

In most plane crashes, the pilot is trying to avoid crashing. In this one, it was intentional. The plane hit the ground at 500+ mph.

And the bodies were mangled and burned. But most of the families received personal effects from the wreckage. Not to mention the phone calls from the flight. Do you think the gov't faked 26 phone calls from people to their loved ones? Or do you think the families of those who died in the crash went along with the charade after their loved ones were murdered?

There were body PARTS.

Doy

Post up some other photos of plane crashes with zero wreckage! Good luck and God bless!

ValueJet #592

Lol.....or not

 

[sparky]

And there were, at least, some partial remains identified for each of the 40 people who died on the ground in the field in PA. And that was a contained area of open ground

Not according to the initial report of the CORONER.... who later changed his story to fit the Zionist bullshit.

Where are the bodies and parts of the plane??





Exactly as the coroner initially posted

someone had dug a ditch, filled it with metal junk, and set it on fire.

There were no bodies, so I clocked out....

In most plane crashes, the pilot is trying to avoid crashing. In this one, it was intentional. The plane hit the ground at 500+ mph.

And the bodies were mangled and burned. But most of the families received personal effects from the wreckage. Not to mention the phone calls from the flight. Do you think the gov't faked 26 phone calls from people to their loved ones? Or do you think the families of those who died in the crash went along with the charade after their loved ones were murdered?

There were body PARTS.

Of course, why fake the phone calls? You have to get an actress or actor to make the completely unnecessary call. And if the goal was to get us into Iraq, why not have the phone calls implicate Saddam?

Duh

You are the kind of sucker, like Winterborn, to automatically think the Muhammad Atta photo is authentic.....same as the phone calls. Two 100 story skyscrapers just disappear....no wreckage after the collapse! Fire in the basement of the towers burns FOR WEEKS!!

Or the shotgun in the glovebox of Adam Lanza's Honda Civic.....front windows being shot out with .223 rounds but no damage to the wall 30 feet behind. You suckers will believe any "official" report.

You suckers will believe any "official" report.

But you'll believe this guy>

 

[candycorn]

And there were, at least, some partial remains identified for each of the 40 people who died on the ground in the field in PA. And that was a contained area of open ground

Not according to the initial report of the CORONER.... who later changed his story to fit the Zionist bullshit.

Where are the bodies and parts of the plane??





Exactly as the coroner initially posted

someone had dug a ditch, filled it with metal junk, and set it on fire.

There were no bodies, so I clocked out....

In most plane crashes, the pilot is trying to avoid crashing. In this one, it was intentional. The plane hit the ground at 500+ mph.

And the bodies were mangled and burned. But most of the families received personal effects from the wreckage. Not to mention the phone calls from the flight. Do you think the gov't faked 26 phone calls from people to their loved ones? Or do you think the families of those who died in the crash went along with the charade after their loved ones were murdered?

There were body PARTS.

Of course, why fake the phone calls? You have to get an actress or actor to make the completely unnecessary call. And if the goal was to get us into Iraq, why not have the phone calls implicate Saddam?

Duh

You are the kind of sucker, like Winterborn, to automatically think the Muhammad Atta photo is authentic.....same as the phone calls. Two 100 story skyscrapers just disappear....no wreckage after the collapse! Fire in the basement of the towers burns FOR WEEKS!!

Or the shotgun in the glovebox of Adam Lanza's Honda Civic.....front windows being shot out with .223 rounds but no damage to the wall 30 feet behind. You suckers will believe any "official" report.

So you think the supposed perpetrators on 9/11 would risk having voice actors on staff to make fake phone calls to loved ones for the sake of adding authenticity to the hijackings? Me thinks the dead bodies would be authentic enough for most.

 

[Faun]

And there were, at least, some partial remains identified for each of the 40 people who died on the ground in the field in PA. And that was a contained area of open ground

Not according to the initial report of the CORONER.... who later changed his story to fit the Zionist bullshit.

Where are the bodies and parts of the plane??





Exactly as the coroner initially posted

someone had dug a ditch, filled it with metal junk, and set it on fire.

There were no bodies, so I clocked out....

In most plane crashes, the pilot is trying to avoid crashing. In this one, it was intentional. The plane hit the ground at 500+ mph.

And the bodies were mangled and burned. But most of the families received personal effects from the wreckage. Not to mention the phone calls from the flight. Do you think the gov't faked 26 phone calls from people to their loved ones? Or do you think the families of those who died in the crash went along with the charade after their loved ones were murdered?

There were body PARTS.

Doy

Post up some other photos of plane crashes with zero wreckage! Good luck and God bless!

ValueJet #592

Lol.....or not

Oh? You see a plane wreck there?

 

[sparky]

Interesting right wing 'deep state' conspiracies, so i'm curiouys to ask what motivations would the alleged 'perps' have ?

~S~

 

[Two Thumbs]

The myth of course is that airplanes flew through steel and concrete buildings. Reality says impossible. What we saw should have looked a lot more like an egg hitting the floor than an arrow piercing a sheet of paper. A 125 tons aluminum aircraft against a 500,000 ton skyscraper? Ridiculous! Just the exterior frame of the building in just the 'affected area' had more mass than the entire plane. Airplanes are sturdy but fragile, they're so light weight they can fly!
Watch the attached vid an try to convince yourself that a plane could fly through one of the strongest structures ever built.

How Do They Do It? - Airplane Recycling

I bolded all the obvious bullshit, the utter nonsense, the complete lunacy.


welcome back, seems you can't escape the asylum.

 

[sparky]

 

[saltydancin]

And why 10 year old kids can also learn Newton's Third Law (I did when I built my first flying model rocket) , "For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction". In every collision between two objects both objects receive equal impact force, reducing every collision into a test of materials strength. Steel and concrete beat aluminum every time!

Did you even bother to watch the video? How do you explain the ease with which a steel excavator literally devoured the airplane. Notice that the excavator barely sways while ripping the plane apart.

The idea that a plane could fly through 14" steel box columns spaced one meter on center is embarrassingly absurd.

Less than 2 oz of.lead traveling at 2,200 feet per second will penetrate your skull or a sheet of aircraft aluminum. How much did you say those planes weighed again?

Yeah, how far will it penetrate 1/2" steel plate? And the suppossed planes weren't going 2200 ft per second. Besides Newton's Third Law says the planes received as much impact force as the building. Stronger, denser materials in the building. Steel and concrete beat aluminum every time!
Fully loaded around 125 tons. The building around 500,000 tons!

They didn't impact the whole building, only a couple of floors. The whole plane didn't fly through, only heavier fragments, like engines. Dude, it's not rocket science. It's all been investigated and explained ad nauseum. There is no dark conspiracy to cover anything up.

Doesn't take engineering or physics understanding any more than:
knocking down a house of cards - Bing video

 

[Crepitus]

And why 10 year old kids can also learn Newton's Third Law (I did when I built my first flying model rocket) , "For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction". In every collision between two objects both objects receive equal impact force, reducing every collision into a test of materials strength. Steel and concrete beat aluminum every time!

Did you even bother to watch the video? How do you explain the ease with which a steel excavator literally devoured the airplane. Notice that the excavator barely sways while ripping the plane apart.

The idea that a plane could fly through 14" steel box columns spaced one meter on center is embarrassingly absurd.

Less than 2 oz of.lead traveling at 2,200 feet per second will penetrate your skull or a sheet of aircraft aluminum. How much did you say those planes weighed again?

Yeah, how far will it penetrate 1/2" steel plate? And the suppossed planes weren't going 2200 ft per second. Besides Newton's Third Law says the planes received as much impact force as the building. Stronger, denser materials in the building. Steel and concrete beat aluminum every time!
Fully loaded around 125 tons. The building around 500,000 tons!

They didn't impact the whole building, only a couple of floors. The whole plane didn't fly through, only heavier fragments, like engines. Dude, it's not rocket science. It's all been investigated and explained ad nauseum. There is no dark conspiracy to cover anything up.

Doesn't take engineering or physics understanding any more than:
knocking down a house of cards - Bing video

American built sky scrapers are not houses of cards.

 

[saltydancin]

And why 10 year old kids can also learn Newton's Third Law (I did when I built my first flying model rocket) , "For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction". In every collision between two objects both objects receive equal impact force, reducing every collision into a test of materials strength. Steel and concrete beat aluminum every time!

Did you even bother to watch the video? How do you explain the ease with which a steel excavator literally devoured the airplane. Notice that the excavator barely sways while ripping the plane apart.

The idea that a plane could fly through 14" steel box columns spaced one meter on center is embarrassingly absurd.

Less than 2 oz of.lead traveling at 2,200 feet per second will penetrate your skull or a sheet of aircraft aluminum. How much did you say those planes weighed again?

Yeah, how far will it penetrate 1/2" steel plate? And the suppossed planes weren't going 2200 ft per second. Besides Newton's Third Law says the planes received as much impact force as the building. Stronger, denser materials in the building. Steel and concrete beat aluminum every time!
Fully loaded around 125 tons. The building around 500,000 tons!

They didn't impact the whole building, only a couple of floors. The whole plane didn't fly through, only heavier fragments, like engines. Dude, it's not rocket science. It's all been investigated and explained ad nauseum. There is no dark conspiracy to cover anything up.

Doesn't take engineering or physics understanding any more than:
knocking down a house of cards - Bing video

American built sky scrapers are not houses of cards.

American built skyscrapers getting flown into by jet airliners certainly look similar to houses of cards destruction…...

 

[chops_]

was just thinking that 3,405,302 crazy twoofer threads on this site weren't enough. We needed another.

And then, along came this one.

Only 3,405,302?

Well, damned! Now that's a conspiracy theory in itself.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

The myth of course is that airplanes flew through steel and concrete buildings. Reality says impossible. What we saw should have looked a lot more like an egg hitting the floor than an arrow piercing a sheet of paper. A 125 tons aluminum aircraft against a 500,000 ton skyscraper? Ridiculous! Just the exterior frame of the building in just the 'affected area' had more mass than the entire plane. Airplanes are sturdy but fragile, they're so light weight they can fly!
Watch the attached vid an try to convince yourself that a plane could fly through one of the strongest structures ever built.

How Do They Do It? - Airplane Recycling

Since I am of the Air Force, let me tell you a thing or two. A jet full of fuel that weighs 10,000 pounds can smash up any glass and girder structure especially when it is coming in at about 500 mph. But if you notice about the towers, the superstructure of it, still withstood the impact of the crash, but after a few hours of intense HEAT, even that metal soon melted.

I don't expect idiots like you who graduated from public education would know such stuff, which is why I am giving you a somewhat 7th grade scientific explanation. If you didn't pass 6th then all this went over your head.

Well then you are obviously a senial old man with Alzheimer’s disease then.lol

You also have shit on your face with your babble that the heat from the fires caused them to collapse,you are the one without a sixth grade education.those fires were not hot enough to melt a marshmellow,let alone weaken steel. Also before embarrassing yourself even further that jet fuel fires weakened the steel,If you bothered to research the case,you would know witnesses said they heard explosions in the basement before the plane struck above, many of them heard explosions including credible firefighters experienced in explosives.They were insulted by the commissions findings calling the investigation a half baked farce.

Not only that thousands of architects and engineers and even demolition experts agree with them. Also bld 7 was not hit by a plane and yet it collapsed even though there were other buildings much closer to the towers With far more damage and far worse fires yet they did not collapse, Also a couple of witnesses there also said they heard explosions in the basement of bld 7. you shit for brains,is the one that does not have a seventh grade education as you just proved in spades.

andaronjim

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Plane Crashes Into Apartment Building Near Dulles Airport
There is an example of a Cessna crashing into an apartment building. All but the tail was inside the building.

Tampa Plane Crash — Steemit
There is another example of a small airplane penetrating the outer wall of a skyscraper.

But a 767 can't penetrate a brick wall and some 14" box columns? lol

Problem is with that is there are thousands of architects and engineers and even demolition experts that have debunked the lies that the fires caused the collapse of the towers,as well as the fact witnesses heard explosions coming from the basement before the plane hit above,these witnesses have NO REASON to lie,to say they do is childish and an insult to the family’s.

Also bld 7 collapsed as well which was not hit by an airliner,bld 7 is the crux of the 9/11 coverup,that proves the towers came down by explosives sense it collapsed the same identical way yet It was NOT hit by a plane is the difference here.

plus the fact as I just said,there were other buildings much closer to the towers than bld seven with far more severe fires than it and far more extensive damage done to them yet THEY all remained standing,these Little facts nobody has ever been able to get around that explosives brought down the towers.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

To me, the biggest piece of evidence against these ridiculous conspiracy theories is the lack of people coming forward and admitting it.

There would have to have been tens of thousands of people in on the planning and execution of such an event. Our gov't can't even keep a blowjob a secret.

Wow you are really getting desperate trying to convince yourself the government told the truth.teans. Of thousands,better stop smoking that crack your on,actually less than a couple hundred,maybe even less than a hundred.comedy gold.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Mach 1 at sea level not possible for those planes. I don't know what if anything hit the towers, I do know that aluminum airplanes cannot penetrate a steel and concrete structure without slowing down, bending, breaking, crumpling or having and debris fall to the ground .

First, the buildings were not concrete. They were steel girders with glass curtain walls. Only concrete was the floors a and the middle structure around the stairways and elevator shafts. And the planes DID crumple. They did not make it through the other side.

Not according to this one video out there that shows it passing in and out the tower like it was butter.lol.

What’s really comical is you are on winterborns side and even you have debunked his babble acknowledging the towers were not just glass the plane went through,but glass AND steel making it IMPOSSIBLE for the planes to get through. Lol

 

[Faun]

And there were, at least, some partial remains identified for each of the 40 people who died on the ground in the field in PA. And that was a contained area of open ground

Not according to the initial report of the CORONER.... who later changed his story to fit the Zionist bullshit.

Where are the bodies and parts of the plane??





Exactly as the coroner initially posted

someone had dug a ditch, filled it with metal junk, and set it on fire.

There were no bodies, so I clocked out....

In most plane crashes, the pilot is trying to avoid crashing. In this one, it was intentional. The plane hit the ground at 500+ mph.

And the bodies were mangled and burned. But most of the families received personal effects from the wreckage. Not to mention the phone calls from the flight. Do you think the gov't faked 26 phone calls from people to their loved ones? Or do you think the families of those who died in the crash went along with the charade after their loved ones were murdered?

There were body PARTS.

Doy

Post up some other photos of plane crashes with zero wreckage! Good luck and God bless!

ValueJet #592

Lol.....or not

Oh? You see a plane wreck there?

LOL

Nearly 2 years later ... and ... still no answer.

 

[Dale Smith]

And there were, at least, some partial remains identified for each of the 40 people who died on the ground in the field in PA. And that was a contained area of open ground

Not according to the initial report of the CORONER.... who later changed his story to fit the Zionist bullshit.

Where are the bodies and parts of the plane??





Exactly as the coroner initially posted

someone had dug a ditch, filled it with metal junk, and set it on fire.

There were no bodies, so I clocked out....

In most plane crashes, the pilot is trying to avoid crashing. In this one, it was intentional. The plane hit the ground at 500+ mph.

And the bodies were mangled and burned. But most of the families received personal effects from the wreckage. Not to mention the phone calls from the flight. Do you think the gov't faked 26 phone calls from people to their loved ones? Or do you think the families of those who died in the crash went along with the charade after their loved ones were murdered?

There were body PARTS.

Doy

Post up some other photos of plane crashes with zero wreckage! Good luck and God bless!

ValueJet #592

Lol.....or not

Oh? You see a plane wreck there?

LOL

Nearly 2 years later ... and ... still no answer.

He posts great information and God knows you can't refute what he posts. Your nervous giggles doesn't qualify as debate.