Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 125,874
- 90,696
- 3,635
No matter how you try and spin it, you agreed it was the plane's shadow when you thought it proved a north of Citgo approach. Once you realized it proved a south of Citgo approach, it became "darkened pixels.""Says the guy who says a few darkened pixels is "proof" that the official story is true -.-.."
LOLOLOL
Need I remind you? You agreed it was the plane's shadow before you denied it;
No, I agreed it was -possible- that it was the plane's shadow. I see such nuances such as the difference between possible and definitely are lost on you though -.-
Well when you thought it proved the plane approached from the north side of the Citgo you referred to it as the "shadow from the plane;" and since you realized it proved the plane was on the south side, you now refer to it as "darkened pixels."
Don't think this flip-flop, and its implication, of yours has gone unnoticed.
As mentioned in Post #270:
I said (and I quote): "I certainly agree with the 'shadow from the plane' bit." I thought you would understand the context within which I said it- that is, that I thought it was -possible- that there was video evidence of the Pentaplane passing the Citgo gas station. I never said that I believe that it proved that the Pentaplane flew north of the Citgo. Another point to consider- I was pretty much taking it on faith that there -was- evidence of a plane's shadow. As you may recall, you had to painstakingly point out a few darkened pixels to me, because prior to you doing so, I couldn't see anything that could even remotely be construed as a shadow of any kind.
And regardless, there's nothing else it can be. It's in the exact right location at the exact right time for the exact approach to hit the lamp posts and the generator and fly into the Pentagon at a 42° angle.
You're done. Your acceptance is not actually needed.