Fizz
Rookie
- Nov 20, 2009
- 4,391
- 346
- 0
- Banned
- #61
you remember it... fuck off..you want to post this statement prove it
see, this is the problem with you twoofers. you require no proof of a conspiracy. yet when someone calls you on the carpet as saying the data you have is bogus you ask for the proof.
so why dont YOU prove the door was ever opened at all and it was a working sensor?
anyway, here is the NTSB report. http://www.ntsb.gov/info/AAL77_fdr.pdf
read through it all you like. you will find that AA77 was a 757-2.
the flight data recorder was upgraded to a 757-3 at some point and had more available parameters even though not all of them would provide data without the sensors. so therefore the data read the door was closed all the time (or open all the time depending on whether the door closed was equivalent to a 1 or a 0 in the data).
you can believe me or you can believe the guy in australia. i dont see how he is any more qusalified to read the data than me but you make your own choice.
or even better yet, you could look at the available data yourself.