9/11 EVERYTHING but the steel was exploded into dust before it hit the ground

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by creativedreams, Nov 23, 2009.

  1. creativedreams
    Offline

    creativedreams Weaver

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,165
    Thanks Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Ratings:
    +30
    Here there is a symetrical eplosion completely around the perimeter before the top has even completely met the next floor below.

    [​IMG]



    How can EVERYTHING except the steel be exploded into pulverized concrete dust before it even hits the ground?

    [​IMG]

    EVERY picture of Ground Zero where the Twin Towers stood is evidence of explosives being used in the fact that almost NOTHING is left but a sea of steel.........and this happened before it even hits the ground!

    [​IMG]

    Look at this picture above.....EVERYTHING except the steel was EXPLODED into pulverized dust before it even hit the ground and settled in a thick layer of dust throughout the city.
     
  2. creativedreams
    Offline

    creativedreams Weaver

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,165
    Thanks Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Ratings:
    +30
    Building #7 had some damage on a corner of the block long building and opposite corners a block away collapsed at the exact same time making this block long building collapse concentrically and symetrically along the entire length of the building.....


    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]

    Collapse of Building #7 compared to controlled demolition
    [​IMG]

    Collapse of Building #7 compared to controlled demolition[​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Nov 23, 2009
  3. creativedreams
    Offline

    creativedreams Weaver

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,165
    Thanks Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Ratings:
    +30
    Everyone who either works or lives in a highrise building should watch this video.....

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7U22m9xLrQ"]YouTube- EMERGENCY WARNING FOR OFFICE WORKERS (NIST WTC7)[/ame]
     
    Last edited: Nov 23, 2009
  4. creativedreams
    Offline

    creativedreams Weaver

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,165
    Thanks Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Ratings:
    +30
    Building 7 had damage to one corner and opposite corners a block away fall at exactly the same time in a concentric and symetric collapse evenly all the way across the block long building.

    These buildings didn't collapse symetrically and concentrically at almost freefall speeds.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. creativedreams
    Offline

    creativedreams Weaver

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,165
    Thanks Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Ratings:
    +30
    This is NOT a simple collapsing building from fire and damage.

    Something is clearly blowing all the vertical structure out of the way.

    Even a physicist for NASA for almost 30yrs has stated "seeing the huge pyroclastic cloud of pulverized concrete dust and the massive structural members being hurled horizontally leaves no doubt in my mind explosives were used to bring down the World Trade Center Buildings."

    Even a Physicist that worked for NASA for almost 30yrs said there is no doubt in his mind the World Trade Center buildings were brought down by explosives.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  6. creativedreams
    Offline

    creativedreams Weaver

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,165
    Thanks Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Ratings:
    +30
    Tom Leppert the CEO for Turner Construction which did many months of construction renovation work on the World Trade Center buildings up to the very day of 9/11 went on to be appointed by George Bush to the President's Commission on White House Fellows.
    Turner Construction Company
    White House Fellowships: Commission Members

    Turner Construction worked hand and hand with Controlled Demolition Inc(CDI) on many demolition projects.

    Look at the website for Controlled Demolition Inc and it states right in there that part of their work includes "classified" work for the U.S. Department of Defense on sensitive projects both domestically and internationally.
    Controlled Demolition, Inc. | Government

    Turner Construction Company also helped performed clean-up at ground zero in which all the steel (evidence) got shipped overseas mostly to China, except for a few hand picked pieces to be sent to NIST for inspection and for part of a memorial ship.

    Turner Construction had a main office located in the third sub-basement of Tower 1. Turner Construction had been performing construction renovation work in various parts throughout the WTC centers and had occupied various office spaces.

    A WTC property assessment described some of the renovations as work upon steel support columns within and around elevator shafts of both WTC Towers.

    Turner Construction also constructed the new headquarters for the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) which manages a laboratory for energetics, explosive materials, propellents, etc and the only reliable source of aluminum nano-powders(nano-thermite) in the United States.
    http://manganaro.com/projbovt.html
     
  7. Fizz
    Offline

    Fizz BANNED

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2009
    Messages:
    4,391
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +349
    ok, let's start at the most basic level on your post. wouldnt a symetrical explosion need to be symetrical?

    the first picture clearly is not as the top of the building is leaning to one side.

    are you forgetting that A FUCKING AIRPLANE FLEW INTO THE BUILDING? :cuckoo:
     
  8. creativedreams
    Offline

    creativedreams Weaver

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,165
    Thanks Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Ratings:
    +30
    Perhaps it was a plane at the Pentagon but what are the chances it hits not only the only part of the building undergoing construction renovations at the time......but ALSO the ONLY part of the Pentagon that was reinforce for a possible impact?


    11 years of renovations to strengthen the Pentagon and they ONLY do the part of the building that is involved in the 9/11 incident?

    I found this article in the archives of USA Today......Here is a direct quote from the article:

    "Luck — if it can be called that — had it that the terrorists aimed the Boeing 757 at the only part of the Pentagon that already had been renovated in an 11-year, $1.3 billion project meant to bolster it against attack. That significantly limited the damage and loss of life by slowing the plane as it tore through the building and reducing the explosion's reach."

    Here is the USA Todays link to the article from its archives.

    USATODAY.com - Pentagon repairs to cost $700 million

    11 years of renovations to strengthen the Pentagon and they ONLY do the part of the building that is involved in the 9/11 incident?
     
  9. creativedreams
    Offline

    creativedreams Weaver

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,165
    Thanks Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Ratings:
    +30
    The top does not have a chance to continue falling to that direction because the vertical supports are simultaniously removed below it starting the symetrical collapse at almost freefall speeds.

    If you plug in the collapse speeds into the equation there is almost NO room for any structural resistance in the equation and this is why NIST had to change its report explaining the collapses a couple times.....after MANY Engineers and Physicists outcried that it is false and re-writes physics.

    NIST still hasn't explained the collapses without re-writing physics and I can bring up MANY Physicists, Engineers, Architects, Scientists, Professors with well documented statements to back this.
     
  10. Fizz
    Offline

    Fizz BANNED

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2009
    Messages:
    4,391
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +349
    proof please.
     

Share This Page