11 years to reinforce the only part of the Pentagon that ends up in the 9/11 incident

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by creativedreams, Nov 23, 2009.

  1. creativedreams
    Offline

    creativedreams Weaver

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,165
    Thanks Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Ratings:
    +30
    11 years of renovations to strengthen the Pentagon and they ONLY do the part of the building that is involved in the 9/11 incident?

    Perhaps it was a plane at the Pentagon but what are the chances it hits not only the only part of the building undergoing construction renovations at the time......but ALSO the ONLY part of the Pentagon that was reinforce for a possible impact?

    I found this article in the archives of USA Today......Here is a direct quote from the article:

    "Luck — if it can be called that — had it that the terrorists aimed the Boeing 757 at the only part of the Pentagon that already had been renovated in an 11-year, $1.3 billion project meant to bolster it against attack. That significantly limited the damage and loss of life by slowing the plane as it tore through the building and reducing the explosion's reach."

    Here is the USA Todays link to the article from its archives.

    USATODAY.com - Pentagon repairs to cost $700 million

    11 years of renovations to strengthen the Pentagon and they ONLY do the part of the building that is involved in the 9/11 incident?
     
  2. creativedreams
    Offline

    creativedreams Weaver

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,165
    Thanks Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Ratings:
    +30
    All of the evidence of the plane parts put together that was planted......er......found at the Pentagon amounted to less than a pickup load.

    Plus every piece was small enough for one man to carry.

    A boeing 757 has 10 rims and only one shows up....

    I like how there was ONLY one rim out of TEN...

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  3. creativedreams
    Offline

    creativedreams Weaver

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,165
    Thanks Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Ratings:
    +30
    The following is a well documented statement from a former aircraft accident investigator who signed a petition for a new investigation into the events of 9/11....


    Col. George Nelson, MBA, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Former U.S. Air Force aircraft accident investigator and airplane parts authority. Graduate, U.S. Air Force War College. 34-year Air Force career.

    Licensed commercial pilot. Licensed airframe and powerplant mechanic.
    Essay: "In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft -- and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. ...

    The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public view. …

    With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon as alleged. Similarly, with all the evidence available at the Pennsylvania crash site, it was most doubtful that a passenger airliner caused the obvious hole in the ground and certainly not the Boeing 757 as alleged. …

    As painful and heartbreaking as was the loss of innocent lives and the lingering health problems of thousands more, a most troublesome and nightmarish probability remains that so many Americans appear to be involved in the most heinous conspiracy in our country's history."
     
  4. creativedreams
    Offline

    creativedreams Weaver

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,165
    Thanks Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Ratings:
    +30
    There are countless people debating the damage at the Pentagon vs what a 757 should have looked like.

    Many of which are former Military and Government workers who have disturbing statements about 9/11

    Some claim a remote operated A3 SkyWarrior? Who knows?

    [​IMG]
     
  5. creativedreams
    Offline

    creativedreams Weaver

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,165
    Thanks Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Ratings:
    +30
    Jesse talks about the Gulf of Tonkin in the both interviews, among many other things.

    WOW these are very good interviews!

    I used to stereotype Jesse Ventura until I've seen some of his interviews.

    He tells it so anyone can understand...

    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lb9Y_HuHeR0]YouTube - Jesse Ventura Body Slams Fox & Fools on Torture Part 2[/ame]

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apn2UcpG2L0"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apn2UcpG2L0[/ame]
     
  6. creativedreams
    Offline

    creativedreams Weaver

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,165
    Thanks Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Ratings:
    +30
    So how about it Anti-Truthers? Care to explain away the 11 years of construction reinforcements at the Pentagon ONLY on the part of the building involved on 9/11?
     
  7. candycorn
    Offline

    candycorn Alis volat propriis

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2009
    Messages:
    37,499
    Thanks Received:
    4,541
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +12,045
    creative schemes = :cuckoo:
     
  8. Fizz
    Offline

    Fizz BANNED

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2009
    Messages:
    4,391
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +349
    you keep repeating the same things that have already been proven to be lies elsewhere in the forum. there were aircraft parts with serial numbers recovered. black boxes were recovered. air traffic control tracked the flight until it crashed. body parts from the passengers were recovered. all the evidence would not fit in the back of a pickup truck as you allege. all the pieces were not small enough for one man to pick up.

    try picking this piece up please:
    [​IMG]
     
  9. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,516
    Thanks Received:
    5,898
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,927
    Not to mention what happens to an airplane when it travels at speed directly into a concrete wall designed to take an impact. They tend to disintegrate.

    But I still want one of these conspiracy people to tell me WHERE the people and the airplane went if not into the Pentagon. Pretty simple question.

    How did the aircraft fly out of the DC area without being tracked by radar? Where did it land? What happened to the passengers, one of whom was a wife of a Cabinet member? How did they get DNA evidence of passengers and crew at the crash site? WHERE is the airplane?

    And of course a couple side questions. What TYPE of missile was used? No known missile can make the damage pattern at the Pentagon. What and whom fired it? And from where? Why was this aircraft ( if that is what it was) not seen on any radar? Who loaded the missile on the aircraft, who flew the aircraft? Who launched the aircraft and from what air field? Where did this aircraft land? Where did the missile come from?

    Who paid all the eyewitnesses that SAW the aircraft as it approached the Pentagon? What clipped the telephone poles? No known missile can survive in flight while slamming into the tops of Telephone poles that I know of.

    Why, after 8 years as NOT one person come forward to admit or claim they were in on the missile attack in some capacity? That they saw something, heard something, heard a rumor of something?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  10. Fizz
    Offline

    Fizz BANNED

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2009
    Messages:
    4,391
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +349
    so?

    it's this type of "evidence" that makes people think troofers are completely nuts. there was a 1 in 5 chance of it hitting any particular side of the 5 sided building. if you think those odds are so incredibly bad then feel free to play russian roulette with a six shooter. your odds will be better than the newly renovated section.

    feel free to reply after playing.

    (or maybe not)
     

Share This Page