$83,190,00 - Costs of 59 tomahawk's could make America great again

[danielpalos]

$83,190,000
Just imagine, how many Americans could be benefited!
The new concept: Make Deep State and Military Industry happy again.

Just imagine how much solar power road pavement, could have been done in Idaho, for that amount.

/---- it's a stupid straw man argument. Why didn't Obozo's Trillion Dollar stimuless do that ?

The rich needed their bailout?

 

[depotoo]

You believe the UN only when convenient, don't you, Penelope...
2013 Sarin attack to UN intervention: History of chemical weapons used in Syria | world-news | Hindustan Times
Hindustan Times › world-news › 2013-sa...
4 days ago - Chemical weapons have killed hundreds of people since the start of Syria's civil war, with the UN blaming three attacks on the Syrian government and a fourth on the Islamic...

A spectacular fireworks show to impress the gullible.

Impress the gullible about what?

That our Tomahawks can hit targets?

That Trump wont put up with Assad gassing people?

Why is any of that a bad thing?

Prove Assad gassed anyone, as many do not believe no such thing. It has been shown he never gassed anyone before, why start now?

 

[depotoo]

In Libya? I'll repeat-

In 2011, Obama used 112 tomahawks in one day-
http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/tomahawks-and-raptors-used-in-syria/
"How ironic is it that Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Obama also used the Tomahawk missile he seeks to scrap as his weapon of choice when on March 19, 2011, he launched Operation Odyssey Dawn. On that day, he fired 112 Tomahawks at Libyan targets to enforce a United Nations-backed no-fly zone in support of Libyan rebels fighting Moammar Gadhafi. Some 220 Tomahawks were fired in total at Libyan targets."

Did you complain when Obama used them?

President Barack Obama began his air assault on the so-called Islamic State (ISIS, or ISIL) group in eastern Syria in 2014 with 47 Tomahawk missiles.

What Is It With US Presidents and Tomahawk Cruise-Missile Strikes?

military spending returns less per dollar than other areas of spending.....look it up then make your cute emotes

Obama was fighting ISIS.

 

[danielpalos]

Should we ask the UN to help end the conflict? We have a First Amendment.

 

[depotoo]

Well, considering Obama used 112 in one day in Libya (vs 59) and all, not to mention the other 118 in the same Libya he used, and the other 49 on isis in one day, and, well, you get the point. Surely...

$83,190,000
Just imagine, how many Americans could be benefited!
The new concept: Make Deep State and Military Industry happy again.

 

[depotoo]

Name one conflict the UN has solved.
And what does the First have to do with it?

Should we ask the UN to help end the conflict? We have a First Amendment.

 

[danielpalos]

Name one conflict the UN has solved.
And what does the First have to do with it?

Should we ask the UN to help end the conflict? We have a First Amendment.

It is more cost effect for the UN.

 

[depotoo]

No, it's not. Nor do they solve anything.

Name one conflict the UN has solved.
And what does the First have to do with it?

Should we ask the UN to help end the conflict? We have a First Amendment.

It is more cost effect for the UN.

 

[danielpalos]

No, it's not. Nor do they solve anything.

Name one conflict the UN has solved.
And what does the First have to do with it?

Should we ask the UN to help end the conflict? We have a First Amendment.

It is more cost effect for the UN.

yes, it is, and yes, they do.

what can the US do that the UN cannot?

 

[depotoo]

Take action, rather than commission report after report, and mull for years, while the atrocities continue, and then mull some more when the sanctions have been broken.

No, it's not. Nor do they solve anything.

Name one conflict the UN has solved.
And what does the First have to do with it?

Should we ask the UN to help end the conflict? We have a First Amendment.

It is more cost effect for the UN.

yes, it is, and yes, they do.

what can the US do that the UN cannot?

 

[danielpalos]

Take action, rather than commission report after report, and mull for years, while the atrocities continue, and then mull some more when the sanctions have been broken.

No, it's not. Nor do they solve anything.

Name one conflict the UN has solved.
And what does the First have to do with it?

Should we ask the UN to help end the conflict? We have a First Amendment.

It is more cost effect for the UN.

yes, it is, and yes, they do.

what can the US do that the UN cannot?

The protests began on 15 March 2011, when protesters marched in the capital of Damascus, demanding democratic reforms and the release of political prisoners.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_Civil_War

 

[depotoo]

And the UN solved nothing in all that time.

Take action, rather than commission report after report, and mull for years, while the atrocities continue, and then mull some more when the sanctions have been broken.

No, it's not. Nor do they solve anything.

Name one conflict the UN has solved.
And what does the First have to do with it?

It is more cost effect for the UN.

yes, it is, and yes, they do.

what can the US do that the UN cannot?

The protests began on 15 March 2011, when protesters marched in the capital of Damascus, demanding democratic reforms and the release of political prisoners.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_Civil_War

 

[danielpalos]

And the UN solved nothing in all that time.

Take action, rather than commission report after report, and mull for years, while the atrocities continue, and then mull some more when the sanctions have been broken.

No, it's not. Nor do they solve anything.

It is more cost effect for the UN.

yes, it is, and yes, they do.

what can the US do that the UN cannot?

The protests began on 15 March 2011, when protesters marched in the capital of Damascus, demanding democratic reforms and the release of political prisoners.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_Civil_War

neither has the US.

 

[depotoo]

A new sheriff is in town.

And the UN solved nothing in all that time.

Take action, rather than commission report after report, and mull for years, while the atrocities continue, and then mull some more when the sanctions have been broken.

No, it's not. Nor do they solve anything.

yes, it is, and yes, they do.

what can the US do that the UN cannot?

The protests began on 15 March 2011, when protesters marched in the capital of Damascus, demanding democratic reforms and the release of political prisoners.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_Civil_War

neither has the US.

 

[danielpalos]

A new sheriff is in town.

And the UN solved nothing in all that time.

Take action, rather than commission report after report, and mull for years, while the atrocities continue, and then mull some more when the sanctions have been broken.

yes, it is, and yes, they do.

what can the US do that the UN cannot?

The protests began on 15 March 2011, when protesters marched in the capital of Damascus, demanding democratic reforms and the release of political prisoners.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_Civil_War

neither has the US.

The right wing has no capital solutions, only social solutions.

 

[jasonnfree]

$83,190,000
Just imagine, how many Americans could be benefited!
The new concept: Make Deep State and Military Industry happy again.

Then trump couldn't prove he's a war prezident just like obama and bush and clinton and bush.....