70% of Blacks Supported Same-Sex Marriage Ban in California

Corny is how I took it. Like rolleyes, but the man version. There's a reason you keep injecting Sharpton, and it's hard to believe you really care "what about how Sharpton thinks this way?" **** but are actually even asking, to begin with, to simply to infer that "someone on the left"...will have a "problem" with disagreeing with Sharpton.

That's my analysis and I stand by it like a fat body holding hands with the Burger King.

:lol::lol::lol:

You mean like Al Sharpton?

:scared1:

naw he eats at that Ruth's Cris (spelling? no clue) steakhouse with fatboy Hannity.

Frankly, I see Al as a BBQ Rib and Tater Salad kinda guy. If I had to have lunch with either Hannity of Sharpton, I'd easily choose Sharpton, even though I'm sure I'd have to pick up the tab.
 
How many fallacies can you fit in one short OP? Ask the Mal........

Is this your real argument?

You're the expert!:

It's illegal to sell your organs but some jackass Pol wants the government to be able to take em for free. This is too much like the government outlawing gambling......except for those State issued lottery tickets.

The best part of the Bill? If the government fucks up and takes your organs even after you've opted out, they won't have to worry about you threatening to write your Rep or go to the media.

:lol::lol:

Stay on your meds, Curv.:eusa_eh:
 
How many fallacies can you fit in one short OP? Ask the Mal........

Is this your real argument?

You're the expert!:

It's illegal to sell your organs but some jackass Pol wants the government to be able to take em for free. This is too much like the government outlawing gambling......except for those State issued lottery tickets.

The best part of the Bill? If the government fucks up and takes your organs even after you've opted out, they won't have to worry about you threatening to write your Rep or go to the media.

:lol::lol:

Stay on your meds, Curv.:eusa_eh:

Explain the fallacy.

It's illegal to sell your organs. A Pol wants to pass a law that let's the government take control of your organs.

The last part of my post is called sarcasm. What else ya got sooper brain?
 
How many fallacies can you fit in one short OP? Ask the Mal........

Is this your real argument?

You're the expert!:

It's illegal to sell your organs but some jackass Pol wants the government to be able to take em for free. This is too much like the government outlawing gambling......except for those State issued lottery tickets.

The best part of the Bill? If the government fucks up and takes your organs even after you've opted out, they won't have to worry about you threatening to write your Rep or go to the media.

:lol::lol:

Stay on your meds, Curv.:eusa_eh:

Explain the fallacy.

It's illegal to sell your organs. A Pol wants to pass a law that let's the government take control of your organs.

The last part of my post is called sarcasm. What else ya got sooper brain?

"Fallacy" is "sarcasm" when its Curv's.:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
:eusa_think:
I just know there is a point to this thread.....right?

Apparently the premise is that black Americans are now the official arbiters to decide what does and doesn't qualify as a civil rights issue...

...with the exception of abortion rights, which pro-lifers like to compare to the Holocaust.

In that case the Jews get to decide.:lol:

Sad to say, but I wish Asians were the official arbuters of something, but they're too busy to answer polls.

How about porn, we can get input from the Japanese to decide what's appropriate porn and we'd never have to worry about dumbass wars on porn from our justice system.
 
This kind of shoots that Republican "theory" that all Democrats march in "lockstep" the way they do.

Like I said, Republicans are nearly all white and Christian

Democrats are:

black
brown
straight
gay
men
women
feminists
Hindu
Mormon
Christians
Muslims
atheists
and the vast majority of scientists


Basically - everyone else.
 
Apparently the premise is that black Americans are now the official arbiters to decide what does and doesn't qualify as a civil rights issue...

...with the exception of abortion rights, which pro-lifers like to compare to the Holocaust.

In that case the Jews get to decide.:lol:

Sad to say, but I wish Asians were the official arbuters of something, but they're too busy to answer polls.

How about porn, we can get input from the Japanese to decide what's appropriate porn and we'd never have to worry about dumbass wars on porn from our justice system.

You've never seen Japanese Porn, have you?
 
Sad to say, but I wish Asians were the official arbuters of something, but they're too busy to answer polls.

How about porn, we can get input from the Japanese to decide what's appropriate porn and we'd never have to worry about dumbass wars on porn from our justice system.

You've never seen Japanese Porn, have you?

I have unfortunately and the only thing more disgusting than some of their hentai is scat. But I don't think either should be illegal.
 
This kind of shoots that Republican "theory" that all Democrats march in "lockstep" the way they do.

Like I said, Republicans are nearly all white and Christian

Democrats are:

black
brown
straight
gay
men
women
feminists
Hindu
Mormon
Christians
Muslims
atheists
and the vast majority of scientists


Basically - everyone else.

Partisan blanket aside this issue has nothing to do with Reps/Dems and everything to do with the stigma of homosexuality in african american groups. If there was a strict choice most white groups would prefer their children be gay versus going to prison but for african american groups they prefer prison over homosexuality.
 
Not all blacks are racist, they just vote that way. It's nothing personal. They stomped Hillary, and they hate white people. No big deal. Fact of life. They hate America so much, they'll keep voting Democrat to drive us into the ground. I understand their view, nothing personal.........
 

Forum List

Back
Top