- Banned
- #401
If dumb fucks wanna rot their brains with that bullshit let them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
thats YOU....but to others it has a legitimate value....especially some of the ones with legit medical problems....Marihuana provides BETTER benefits with fewer side effects than chemical pharmaceuticals.
Again, if you bothered to learn anything about pot, you'd already know this but you can't be bothering learning anything that might challenge your belief structure.
It's still illegal and it still creates an altered mental state in its users. Even if only the second item were true it would have no legitimate value so far as I'm concerned.
i dont know about legalizing it but i think the decriminalization of it aint too far away....It's not illegal everywhere. Perhaps where you live it is but not where I live.
It's illegal on a FEDERAL level, so YES it IS illegal everywhere. Just because Obastard refuses to have the DEA kick doors in throughout Colorado and Washington doesn't make it legal
and I've had two tokes off another joint that LITERALLY CAUSED ME TO GO BLIND.For oneOlder republicans see what young people do when they are high. Older democrats are high themselves.
And what do young people do when high?
Fatal Car Crashes Involving Pot Use Have Tripled in U.S. Study Finds
Epidemiological studies have been inconclusive regarding whether cannabis use causes an increased risk of accidents; in contrast, unanimity exists that alcohol use increases crash risk.
THE EFFECT OF CANNABIS COMPARED WITH ALCOHOL ON DRIVING
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/18/health/driving-under-the-influence-of-marijuana.html?_r=0
Marijuana and Driving A Review of the Scientific Evidence
ROFLMNAO!
What a load of crap.
Unlike Alcohol, there's no objective means to know the potency of what you're ingesting.
A glass of wine rarely sends anyone driving onto the off ramp... I've smoked entire joints and got a nice buzz... and I've had two tokes off another joint that LITERALLY CAUSED ME TO GO BLIND.
So...
and I've had two tokes off another joint that LITERALLY CAUSED ME TO GO BLIND.For oneOlder republicans see what young people do when they are high. Older democrats are high themselves.
And what do young people do when high?
Fatal Car Crashes Involving Pot Use Have Tripled in U.S. Study Finds
Epidemiological studies have been inconclusive regarding whether cannabis use causes an increased risk of accidents; in contrast, unanimity exists that alcohol use increases crash risk.
THE EFFECT OF CANNABIS COMPARED WITH ALCOHOL ON DRIVING
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/18/health/driving-under-the-influence-of-marijuana.html?_r=0
Marijuana and Driving A Review of the Scientific Evidence
ROFLMNAO!
What a load of crap.
Unlike Alcohol, there's no objective means to know the potency of what you're ingesting.
A glass of wine rarely sends anyone driving onto the off ramp... I've smoked entire joints and got a nice buzz... and I've had two tokes off another joint that LITERALLY CAUSED ME TO GO BLIND.
So...
wow...that must have been some good shit....LOL......
if the smoker is paying into a policy then you aint paying for it......That's why you need to watch it. You're completely ignorant and don't know what you're talking about. One of the biggest problems with morons like you is that you keep standing in the way of legitimate pharmacological development.
For me this is a MORALITY issue not a pharmaceutical one; therefore nothing the video could show would make a difference.
No, it's an ignorance issue for you, and nothing more. I repeat: They have cultivated a variety of cannabis that completely lacks THC and consequently has no psychoactive effect whatsoever. It's no different from the fact that there are mushrooms that you eat as food, and then there are mushrooms that some people take as a recreational drug.
To say that it's a morality issue is beyond stupid. Of course, you'd know that if you'd actually watched the video.
Oh! Ok... I'm for legalizing the Pot that doesn't get you high. And for moving up the penalty for possession of pot that does get ya high to the death penalty.
There ya go... make it so.
Glad we got that worked out.
Tell the Kids that the Swimmer worked that out for 'em.
At least we can agree on some part of it. Though I don't see how marijuana prohibition has done any good for our society. If people want to drink themselves to death, let them. Same with smoking cigarettes, or pot. Hell, I wouldn't be opposed to government spending to provide people with all the heroin and meth their little hearts desire. Hurry up and die. Sometimes the best way to deal with a fire is to let it burn itself out.
in a free society thats just fine. But in our current socialist society where we all pay the medical bills of the smokers, drinkers, druggies, etc. then it doesn't work.
I personally don't care if you smoke yourself to death, but I don't want to pay for your cancer treatment.
What the study says is that after it causes the lung cancer is can be use to relieve the pain
Evidence of marijuana’s cancer-fighting properties dates as far back as the 1970s. Munson et al. (1975) were the first group of researchers to find that orally administered THC could slow tumor growth and increase survival rates in animal models of lung cancer. However, research on medical marijuana and lung cancer grew sparse in the following years and has only recently picked up again.
Using animal models and cell cultures, the researchers found that THC treatment over a 28 day period resulted in a 50% reduction in tumor growth and a 60% reduction in cancerous lesions.
Marijuana and Lung Cancer Cause Or Cure - TruthOnPot.com
then make it a legal prescription drug. I don't think anyone has an issue with that. But if you legalize it like tobacco, lung cancer and emphasema rates will increase.
and to cite something from a pro-pot website proves nothing.
thats YOU....but to others it has a legitimate value....especially some of the ones with legit medical problems....
6 In 10 Young Republicans Favor Legal Marijuana...So why dont Republicans?
ok....and you dont want to use it.....are you against others using it IF, they feel it helps out their problems?.....thats YOU....but to others it has a legitimate value....especially some of the ones with legit medical problems....
I have both Glaucoma and Epileptic issues. My father died of Brain Cancer. I think that covers three of the main uses for this shit.
ok....and you dont want to use it.....are you against others using it IF, they feel it helps out their problems?.....
I live in Canada, so NO, medical marihuana is not illegal everywhere. The USA is not the only country in the world.
And yeah, medical marihuana is legal here. In fact, the federal government issues licenses to approved growers.
Sory, my definition of EVERYWHERE ends at the borders of the USA, because that's where the WORLD ends for me. At lesat in part because other nations are even worse in ignoring enforcement of even the most basic MORALS and VALUES than the United States is; and that's saying something.
if the smoker is paying into a policy then you aint paying for it......For me this is a MORALITY issue not a pharmaceutical one; therefore nothing the video could show would make a difference.
No, it's an ignorance issue for you, and nothing more. I repeat: They have cultivated a variety of cannabis that completely lacks THC and consequently has no psychoactive effect whatsoever. It's no different from the fact that there are mushrooms that you eat as food, and then there are mushrooms that some people take as a recreational drug.
To say that it's a morality issue is beyond stupid. Of course, you'd know that if you'd actually watched the video.
Oh! Ok... I'm for legalizing the Pot that doesn't get you high. And for moving up the penalty for possession of pot that does get ya high to the death penalty.
There ya go... make it so.
Glad we got that worked out.
Tell the Kids that the Swimmer worked that out for 'em.
At least we can agree on some part of it. Though I don't see how marijuana prohibition has done any good for our society. If people want to drink themselves to death, let them. Same with smoking cigarettes, or pot. Hell, I wouldn't be opposed to government spending to provide people with all the heroin and meth their little hearts desire. Hurry up and die. Sometimes the best way to deal with a fire is to let it burn itself out.
in a free society thats just fine. But in our current socialist society where we all pay the medical bills of the smokers, drinkers, druggies, etc. then it doesn't work.
I personally don't care if you smoke yourself to death, but I don't want to pay for your cancer treatment.
What the study says is that after it causes the lung cancer is can be use to relieve the pain
Evidence of marijuana’s cancer-fighting properties dates as far back as the 1970s. Munson et al. (1975) were the first group of researchers to find that orally administered THC could slow tumor growth and increase survival rates in animal models of lung cancer. However, research on medical marijuana and lung cancer grew sparse in the following years and has only recently picked up again.
Using animal models and cell cultures, the researchers found that THC treatment over a 28 day period resulted in a 50% reduction in tumor growth and a 60% reduction in cancerous lesions.
Marijuana and Lung Cancer Cause Or Cure - TruthOnPot.com
then make it a legal prescription drug. I don't think anyone has an issue with that. But if you legalize it like tobacco, lung cancer and emphasema rates will increase.
and to cite something from a pro-pot website proves nothing.
Marijuana Cuts Lung Cancer Tumor Growth In Half Study Shows -- ScienceDaily
Date:
April 17, 2007
Source:
American Association for Cancer Research
Summary:
The active ingredient in marijuana cuts tumor growth in common lung cancer in half and significantly reduces the ability of the cancer to spread, say researchers at Harvard University who tested the chemical in both lab and mouse studies
I also find it interesting that when some people on this thread can no longer refute the facts and research given to them by others, the next thing they do is holler out that somehow smoking cannabis is immoral.
Maybe by your morality, it's a sin, but certainly not by mine.
It's attitudes like this that are behind the slow slide of the USA into mediocrity. Ignore science, technology, and even common sense and when questioned, stand on moral grounds. Except that your morals have no Biblical basis, no scientific basis and no basis in common sense.
Nearly two-thirds of Millennials who identify as Republican support legalizing marijuana, while almost half of older GOP Gen-Xers do, according to a recently released Pew survey that could be an indicator of where the debate is heading.
While the Pew Research Center survey published on Friday shows a 14 percentage point gap between Republicans and Democrats under the age of 34, six-in-10 GOP-leaning Millennials still said they favor legalizing cannabis. Seventy-seven percent of surveyed Democrats in the same age group held that view.
For those aged 35 to 50, the same 14 percentage point gap between Republicans and Democrats was evident, but the respective percentages were somewhat lower. In that age group, 47 percent of Republicans favored legalization, as opposed to 61 percent of Democrats.
As Pew notes: "The debate over marijuana also comes ahead of the 2016 presidential election, when both political parties are fighting over the coveted Millennial vote as this group of eligible voters swells in size, even if its members do not consistently show up on Election Day."
The survey follows controversial decisions in Alaska and the District of Colombia.They join Colorado and Washington State. Medical marijuana is legal in some other states, such as California and Minnesota.
The survey on attitudes on marijuana legalization by political affiliation largely mirrors a survey Pew conducted a year ago concerning same-sex marriage. It showed that 61 percent of self-identified Republicans under 30 favored allowing gays and lesbians to marry, as opposed to 77 percent of Democrats in the same age group.