5 Videos Some Say Are Proof Of A Coming U.S. Military Coup...

[paulitician]

Pffft. They didn't even have a tank. ...or flamethrowers.

Back to sleep, people.

They're too busy stuffing their fat faces, watching porn & sports to care. They'll just go on feeling real smug spewing their 'Tinfoil Hat' insults. It comforts them.

Trolls gonna troll, right?

Unfortunately, many people can't respect the difference between vigilance and declarative certainty.

It's not limited to one side. The left mocks the right for failed e.g. "invasion" predictions. The right mocks the left for failed "10 million climate refugees by 2010" predictions. The trouble, of course, is that some outlandish predictions are wrong... until they're right.

Online message boards would be far more intellectually profitable places if contributors spent less time mocking opposing viewpoints and more time engaged in critical inquiry, even if that involves a willing suspension of disbelief.

Pointed rhetoric, satire, joking, even parody are appropriate at times, but they shouldn't constitute your primary contributions. If opponents' theories have even a shred of merit to them, do unto others as you would have them do unto you: engage them with a modicum of respect. If you consistently accomplish that, you'll do well.

Ridiculing and Shaming works for em. It makes most feel safer. They don't want to contemplate what's really going on around them. They'd much rather ridicule, stuff their fat faces, watch their porn/sports, and stick their heads in the sand. So i don't get offended by their insults anymore. It's just the way it is. I've moved on.

 

[Skylar]

Pffft. They didn't even have a tank. ...or flamethrowers.

Back to sleep, people.

They're too busy stuffing their fat faces, watching porn & sports to care. They'll just go on feeling real smug spewing their 'Tinfoil Hat' insults. It comforts them.

Trolls gonna troll, right?

Unfortunately, many people can't respect the difference between vigilance and declarative certainty.

It's not limited to one side. The left mocks the right for failed e.g. "invasion" predictions. The right mocks the left for failed "10 million climate refugees by 2010" predictions. The trouble, of course, is that some outlandish predictions are wrong... until they're right.

Online message boards would be far more intellectually profitable places if contributors spent less time mocking opposing viewpoints and more time engaged in critical inquiry, even if that involves a willing suspension of disbelief.

Pointed rhetoric, satire, joking, even parody are appropriate at times, but they shouldn't constitute your primary contributions. If opponents' theories have even a shred of merit to them, do unto others as you would have them do unto you: engage them with a modicum of respect. If you consistently accomplish that, you'll do well.

Ridiculing and Shaming works for em. It makes most feel safer. They don't want to contemplate what's really going on around them.

Yeah, but a coup isn't what's 'really going on around' us. Plus, the predictive record of youtube conspiracy theorists is far worse than guessing. What's the use of a predictive model that doesn't predict anything?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Pffft. They didn't even have a tank. ...or flamethrowers.

Back to sleep, people.

They're too busy stuffing their fat faces, watching porn & sports to care. They'll just go on feeling real smug spewing their 'Tinfoil Hat' insults. It comforts them.

Trolls gonna troll, right?

Unfortunately, many people can't respect the difference between vigilance and declarative certainty.

It's not limited to one side. The left mocks the right for failed e.g. "invasion" predictions. The right mocks the left for failed "10 million climate refugees by 2010" predictions. The trouble, of course, is that some outlandish predictions are wrong... until they're right.

Online message boards would be far more intellectually profitable places if contributors spent less time mocking opposing viewpoints and more time engaged in critical inquiry, even if that involves a willing suspension of disbelief.

Pointed rhetoric, satire, joking, even parody are appropriate at times, but they shouldn't constitute your primary contributions. If opponents' theories have even a shred of merit to them, do unto others as you would have them do unto you: engage them with a modicum of respect. If you consistently accomplish that, you'll do well.

Ridiculing and Shaming works for em. It makes most feel safer. They don't want to contemplate what's really going on around them. They'd much rather ridicule, stuff their fat faces, watch their porn/sports, and stick their heads in the sand. So i don't get offended by their insults anymore. It's just the way it is. I've moved on.

Try moving on, to psychiatric care. They can help you with your delusions of even more delusions...

 

[ogibillm]

i love these theories... who do the theorists think make up the national guard? they aren't all rabid right-wing 'conservatives', salivating at the opportunity to take up arms against their fellow americans.

 

[syonidv]

Pffft. They didn't even have a tank. ...or flamethrowers.

Back to sleep, people.

They're too busy stuffing their fat faces, watching porn & sports to care. They'll just go on feeling real smug spewing their 'Tinfoil Hat' insults. It comforts them.

Trolls gonna troll, right?

Unfortunately, many people can't respect the difference between vigilance and declarative certainty.

It's not limited to one side. The left mocks the right for failed e.g. "invasion" predictions. The right mocks the left for failed "10 million climate refugees by 2010" predictions. The trouble, of course, is that some outlandish predictions are wrong... until they're right.

Online message boards would be far more intellectually profitable places if contributors spent less time mocking opposing viewpoints and more time engaged in critical inquiry, even if that involves a willing suspension of disbelief.

Pointed rhetoric, satire, joking, even parody are appropriate at times, but they shouldn't constitute your primary contributions. If opponents' theories have even a shred of merit to them, do unto others as you would have them do unto you: engage them with a modicum of respect. If you consistently accomplish that, you'll do well.

Ridiculing and Shaming works for em. It makes most feel safer. They don't want to contemplate what's really going on around them. They'd much rather ridicule, stuff their fat faces, watch their porn/sports, and stick their heads in the sand. So i don't get offended by their insults anymore. It's just the way it is. I've moved on.

In all likelihood, they're "right" in that this is nothing more than a routine military exercise. I would shocked if it was anything more than that.

I think you would do well to embrace serious criticism of the "martial law" theory. Or at the very least, present your analysis of what 'fits' with the theory, what doesn't fit, what gaps need to be filled, and collectively come to a better understanding of how likely the theory is to be true.

There's nothing wrong with presenting a theory and immediately disclaiming, "I believe the following is an extremely unlikely scenario, but here are some elements I find concerning. What would be the alternative explanation for this?"

I don't think accusing opponents of watching pornography, burying their heads in the sand, etc. is going to make anyone more receptive to your views, so I'll just leave you with the advice: make this thread about the theory, not about what they think of you or what you think of them. Turn it into a genuine research project, and seek out as many credible dissenting opinions as you can. Test the theory as one would test a scientific hypothesis.

Best of luck to you.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

"I believe the following is an extremely unlikely scenario, but here are some elements I find concerning.

Only this loon is packing, to go live in a cave.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Well, there it is. Check it out and give your opinion. Thanks.

america the land of the free. almost posted the laughing smile there and would have but its such a sick joke i could not bring myself to it.

when i go see a ballgame,i leave and go to the restroom,i get nauseated watching all the stupid sheep take off their hates and salute the CIA which is what they are doing since the country is run by them.I so much get sick to my stomach hearing that propaganda sung-AND THE LAND OF THE FREE. Where is the barf smiley?

 

[syonidv]

"I believe the following is an extremely unlikely scenario, but here are some elements I find concerning.

Only this loon is packing, to go live in a cave.

Why are you even here? If the subject matter doesn't interest you, go find something else that does. Get a life, sir.

 

[paulitician]

Pffft. They didn't even have a tank. ...or flamethrowers.

Back to sleep, people.

They're too busy stuffing their fat faces, watching porn & sports to care. They'll just go on feeling real smug spewing their 'Tinfoil Hat' insults. It comforts them.

Trolls gonna troll, right?

Unfortunately, many people can't respect the difference between vigilance and declarative certainty.

It's not limited to one side. The left mocks the right for failed e.g. "invasion" predictions. The right mocks the left for failed "10 million climate refugees by 2010" predictions. The trouble, of course, is that some outlandish predictions are wrong... until they're right.

Online message boards would be far more intellectually profitable places if contributors spent less time mocking opposing viewpoints and more time engaged in critical inquiry, even if that involves a willing suspension of disbelief.

Pointed rhetoric, satire, joking, even parody are appropriate at times, but they shouldn't constitute your primary contributions. If opponents' theories have even a shred of merit to them, do unto others as you would have them do unto you: engage them with a modicum of respect. If you consistently accomplish that, you'll do well.

Ridiculing and Shaming works for em. It makes most feel safer. They don't want to contemplate what's really going on around them. They'd much rather ridicule, stuff their fat faces, watch their porn/sports, and stick their heads in the sand. So i don't get offended by their insults anymore. It's just the way it is. I've moved on.

In all likelihood, they're "right" in that this is nothing more than a routine military exercise. I would shocked if it was anything more than that.

I think you would do well to embrace serious criticism of the "martial law" theory. Or at the very least, present your analysis of what 'fits' with the theory, what doesn't fit, what gaps need to be filled, and collectively come to a better understanding of how likely the theory is to be true.

There's nothing wrong with presenting a theory and immediately disclaiming, "I believe the following is an extremely unlikely scenario, but here are some elements I find concerning. What would be the alternative explanation for this?"

I don't think accusing opponents of watching pornography, burying their heads in the sand, etc. is going to make anyone more receptive to your views, so I'll just leave you with the advice: make this thread about the theory, not about what they think of you or what you think of them. Turn it into a genuine research project, and seek out as many credible dissenting opinions as you can. Test the theory as one would test a scientific hypothesis.

Best of luck to you.

My feeling is that they're conditioning the People to get used to seeing Military on their streets. They're integrating the Military with Domestic Police. It's very disturbing. But that's just my own personal observation.

 

[nat4900]

These rumors have their basis on many right wingers' distrust of the federal government and, even more so today, of Obama.....
These "seeds" of distrust could not have been better planned and executed by the "smartest" of terrorists.
Paraphrasing the cartoon Pogo, "we've met the [real] enemy...and guess who it is?"

 

[ogibillm]

Pffft. They didn't even have a tank. ...or flamethrowers.

Back to sleep, people.

They're too busy stuffing their fat faces, watching porn & sports to care. They'll just go on feeling real smug spewing their 'Tinfoil Hat' insults. It comforts them.

Trolls gonna troll, right?

Unfortunately, many people can't respect the difference between vigilance and declarative certainty.

It's not limited to one side. The left mocks the right for failed e.g. "invasion" predictions. The right mocks the left for failed "10 million climate refugees by 2010" predictions. The trouble, of course, is that some outlandish predictions are wrong... until they're right.

Online message boards would be far more intellectually profitable places if contributors spent less time mocking opposing viewpoints and more time engaged in critical inquiry, even if that involves a willing suspension of disbelief.

Pointed rhetoric, satire, joking, even parody are appropriate at times, but they shouldn't constitute your primary contributions. If opponents' theories have even a shred of merit to them, do unto others as you would have them do unto you: engage them with a modicum of respect. If you consistently accomplish that, you'll do well.

Ridiculing and Shaming works for em. It makes most feel safer. They don't want to contemplate what's really going on around them. They'd much rather ridicule, stuff their fat faces, watch their porn/sports, and stick their heads in the sand. So i don't get offended by their insults anymore. It's just the way it is. I've moved on.

In all likelihood, they're "right" in that this is nothing more than a routine military exercise. I would shocked if it was anything more than that.

I think you would do well to embrace serious criticism of the "martial law" theory. Or at the very least, present your analysis of what 'fits' with the theory, what doesn't fit, what gaps need to be filled, and collectively come to a better understanding of how likely the theory is to be true.

There's nothing wrong with presenting a theory and immediately disclaiming, "I believe the following is an extremely unlikely scenario, but here are some elements I find concerning. What would be the alternative explanation for this?"

I don't think accusing opponents of watching pornography, burying their heads in the sand, etc. is going to make anyone more receptive to your views, so I'll just leave you with the advice: make this thread about the theory, not about what they think of you or what you think of them. Turn it into a genuine research project, and seek out as many credible dissenting opinions as you can. Test the theory as one would test a scientific hypothesis.

Best of luck to you.

They're integrating the Military with Domestic Police. It's very disturbing.

two things
1) do you have examples of this integration of the military with domestic police?
2) who is 'they?'

 

[paulitician]

They're too busy stuffing their fat faces, watching porn & sports to care. They'll just go on feeling real smug spewing their 'Tinfoil Hat' insults. It comforts them.

Trolls gonna troll, right?

Unfortunately, many people can't respect the difference between vigilance and declarative certainty.

It's not limited to one side. The left mocks the right for failed e.g. "invasion" predictions. The right mocks the left for failed "10 million climate refugees by 2010" predictions. The trouble, of course, is that some outlandish predictions are wrong... until they're right.

Online message boards would be far more intellectually profitable places if contributors spent less time mocking opposing viewpoints and more time engaged in critical inquiry, even if that involves a willing suspension of disbelief.

Pointed rhetoric, satire, joking, even parody are appropriate at times, but they shouldn't constitute your primary contributions. If opponents' theories have even a shred of merit to them, do unto others as you would have them do unto you: engage them with a modicum of respect. If you consistently accomplish that, you'll do well.

Ridiculing and Shaming works for em. It makes most feel safer. They don't want to contemplate what's really going on around them. They'd much rather ridicule, stuff their fat faces, watch their porn/sports, and stick their heads in the sand. So i don't get offended by their insults anymore. It's just the way it is. I've moved on.

In all likelihood, they're "right" in that this is nothing more than a routine military exercise. I would shocked if it was anything more than that.

I think you would do well to embrace serious criticism of the "martial law" theory. Or at the very least, present your analysis of what 'fits' with the theory, what doesn't fit, what gaps need to be filled, and collectively come to a better understanding of how likely the theory is to be true.

There's nothing wrong with presenting a theory and immediately disclaiming, "I believe the following is an extremely unlikely scenario, but here are some elements I find concerning. What would be the alternative explanation for this?"

I don't think accusing opponents of watching pornography, burying their heads in the sand, etc. is going to make anyone more receptive to your views, so I'll just leave you with the advice: make this thread about the theory, not about what they think of you or what you think of them. Turn it into a genuine research project, and seek out as many credible dissenting opinions as you can. Test the theory as one would test a scientific hypothesis.

Best of luck to you.

They're integrating the Military with Domestic Police. It's very disturbing.

two things
1) do you have examples of this integration of the military with domestic police?
2) who is 'they?'

It's happening right before your very eyes. They're counting on you and all Citizens getting used to seeing Military on the streets. It's a conditioning process. And it looks like it's off to a very successful start.

 

[ogibillm]

Trolls gonna troll, right?

Unfortunately, many people can't respect the difference between vigilance and declarative certainty.

It's not limited to one side. The left mocks the right for failed e.g. "invasion" predictions. The right mocks the left for failed "10 million climate refugees by 2010" predictions. The trouble, of course, is that some outlandish predictions are wrong... until they're right.

Online message boards would be far more intellectually profitable places if contributors spent less time mocking opposing viewpoints and more time engaged in critical inquiry, even if that involves a willing suspension of disbelief.

Pointed rhetoric, satire, joking, even parody are appropriate at times, but they shouldn't constitute your primary contributions. If opponents' theories have even a shred of merit to them, do unto others as you would have them do unto you: engage them with a modicum of respect. If you consistently accomplish that, you'll do well.

Ridiculing and Shaming works for em. It makes most feel safer. They don't want to contemplate what's really going on around them. They'd much rather ridicule, stuff their fat faces, watch their porn/sports, and stick their heads in the sand. So i don't get offended by their insults anymore. It's just the way it is. I've moved on.

In all likelihood, they're "right" in that this is nothing more than a routine military exercise. I would shocked if it was anything more than that.

I think you would do well to embrace serious criticism of the "martial law" theory. Or at the very least, present your analysis of what 'fits' with the theory, what doesn't fit, what gaps need to be filled, and collectively come to a better understanding of how likely the theory is to be true.

There's nothing wrong with presenting a theory and immediately disclaiming, "I believe the following is an extremely unlikely scenario, but here are some elements I find concerning. What would be the alternative explanation for this?"

I don't think accusing opponents of watching pornography, burying their heads in the sand, etc. is going to make anyone more receptive to your views, so I'll just leave you with the advice: make this thread about the theory, not about what they think of you or what you think of them. Turn it into a genuine research project, and seek out as many credible dissenting opinions as you can. Test the theory as one would test a scientific hypothesis.

Best of luck to you.

They're integrating the Military with Domestic Police. It's very disturbing.

two things
1) do you have examples of this integration of the military with domestic police?
2) who is 'they?'

It's happening right before your very eyes. They're counting on you and all Citizens getting used to seeing Military on the streets. It's a conditioning process. And it looks like it's off to a very successful start.

what's happening? can you give an example of the supposed integration?

 

[paulitician]

Ridiculing and Shaming works for em. It makes most feel safer. They don't want to contemplate what's really going on around them. They'd much rather ridicule, stuff their fat faces, watch their porn/sports, and stick their heads in the sand. So i don't get offended by their insults anymore. It's just the way it is. I've moved on.

In all likelihood, they're "right" in that this is nothing more than a routine military exercise. I would shocked if it was anything more than that.

I think you would do well to embrace serious criticism of the "martial law" theory. Or at the very least, present your analysis of what 'fits' with the theory, what doesn't fit, what gaps need to be filled, and collectively come to a better understanding of how likely the theory is to be true.

There's nothing wrong with presenting a theory and immediately disclaiming, "I believe the following is an extremely unlikely scenario, but here are some elements I find concerning. What would be the alternative explanation for this?"

I don't think accusing opponents of watching pornography, burying their heads in the sand, etc. is going to make anyone more receptive to your views, so I'll just leave you with the advice: make this thread about the theory, not about what they think of you or what you think of them. Turn it into a genuine research project, and seek out as many credible dissenting opinions as you can. Test the theory as one would test a scientific hypothesis.

Best of luck to you.

They're integrating the Military with Domestic Police. It's very disturbing.

two things
1) do you have examples of this integration of the military with domestic police?
2) who is 'they?'

It's happening right before your very eyes. They're counting on you and all Citizens getting used to seeing Military on the streets. It's a conditioning process. And it looks like it's off to a very successful start.

what's happening? can you give an example of the supposed integration?

I can't make you see it, nor will i try. It's up to you.

 

[NYcarbineer]

So who is at the head of this coming military coup?

 

[ogibillm]

In all likelihood, they're "right" in that this is nothing more than a routine military exercise. I would shocked if it was anything more than that.

I think you would do well to embrace serious criticism of the "martial law" theory. Or at the very least, present your analysis of what 'fits' with the theory, what doesn't fit, what gaps need to be filled, and collectively come to a better understanding of how likely the theory is to be true.

There's nothing wrong with presenting a theory and immediately disclaiming, "I believe the following is an extremely unlikely scenario, but here are some elements I find concerning. What would be the alternative explanation for this?"

I don't think accusing opponents of watching pornography, burying their heads in the sand, etc. is going to make anyone more receptive to your views, so I'll just leave you with the advice: make this thread about the theory, not about what they think of you or what you think of them. Turn it into a genuine research project, and seek out as many credible dissenting opinions as you can. Test the theory as one would test a scientific hypothesis.

Best of luck to you.

They're integrating the Military with Domestic Police. It's very disturbing.

two things
1) do you have examples of this integration of the military with domestic police?
2) who is 'they?'

It's happening right before your very eyes. They're counting on you and all Citizens getting used to seeing Military on the streets. It's a conditioning process. And it looks like it's off to a very successful start.

what's happening? can you give an example of the supposed integration?

I can't make you see it, nor will i try. It's up to you.

so that's a 'no'
you're claiming integration and can't point to any examples.

you completely ignored my question on who the 'they' pushing the integration supposedly is. that makes me think you can't answer that either.

so you have people that may or may not exist possibly doing things that you aren't able to tell us about.

i can see why you're scared

 

[daws101]

hey guys I'll let you in on a
little secret .
the footage of the soldiers shot in Ontario ca was part of a recruitment day at the high school.
the street in the clip is one block west of my house and the high school..
my street and others were packed full of military transport vehicles ..
some of the guys even used my bathroom.
paulie is full of shit as usual!

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Well, there it is. Check it out and give your opinion. Thanks.

america the land of the free. almost posted the laughing smile there and would have but its such a sick joke i could not bring myself to it.

when i go see a ballgame,i leave and go to the restroom,i get nauseated watching all the stupid sheep take off their hates and salute the CIA which is what they are doing since the country is run by them.I so much get sick to my stomach hearing that propaganda sung-AND THE LAND OF THE FREE. Where is the barf smiley?

also in talking about the OP.yeah about a year ago i saw tanks on my highway and saw on the news they were roaming SIDE streets in st louis and i like wtf?

 

[daws101]

is the new guy paulie's friend?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

"I believe the following is an extremely unlikely scenario, but here are some elements I find concerning.

Only this loon is packing, to go live in a cave.

Why are you even here? If the subject matter doesn't interest you, go find something else that does. Get a life, sir.

Mental illness is interesting, and that's what this is. Irrational thinking and paranoia. Just like the FEMA camps of several years ago. The delusions of those unable to tell reality from fantasy.