46 miles of borderwall construction is underway in New Mexico

They are replacing existing barriers with a fence. No new wall? I thought Mexico was going to pay for a new wall, instead of us paying to replace an existing fence.
 
Little Enviro pussy having a great rant on twitter....suggest you all send her some encouragement.... ROTFLMFAO!!!!!!

Southwest Environmental Center (Twitter) ^ | August 20, 2019 | Amanda

46 miles of #borderwall construction is underway in New Mexico, the first stretch using stolen military funds under the “emergency” declaration. Spread the word.
Dubya built 700 miles and it did nothing. 46 under your obese moron? :lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao:

AND it's not even a new wall this time! Holy moly!
 
Well I see the above 2 ABNORMALS seem to think this is replacing an already installed fence...but if the 2 morons looked at pussy girls video it says WALL and shows where it is going up and DAMN not a bullshit fence to be seen..... you turds really do have some LYING balls...but then, that why you scum are cowards and charlatans.....Too FUNNY...ROTFLMFAO!!!
 
The trick would be to construct animal-migration routes like they do in Albuquerque for access to the Manzanos. That way, surveillance could be concentrated, and any Mexican dressed as a bear or pronghorn would be most likely captured. Go Trump!
 
I thought Mexico was going to pay for a new wall

Damn man. You're still on that?

Trump wasn’t lying….was he?

quick…cue the “every president lies” rationalization….
Or "you can keep your doctor and your healthcare plan". An oldie but a goodie but that`s all they have.
A lie that affected millions of Americans healthcare and you compare that to Mexico is gonna pay for the wall. Well Trump was partly correct. Mexico is paying the bill to keep the caravans illegally getting here. Go Trump!
 
Without Chertoff's wall we'd probably have 40M invaders instead of the 22M we have now. The difference being with the solid sheet/brace at the top of the Trump wall, it can't be climbed...A 5th SFG team tried to scale it without hooks and rope and failed.
 
The difference being with the solid sheet/brace at the top of the Trump wall, it can't be climbed...A 5th SFG team tried to scale it without hooks and rope and failed.
It'll be great to have a border wall the Mexicans can't get past.
 
Without Chertoff's wall we'd probably have 40M invaders instead of the 22M we have now. The difference being with the solid sheet/brace at the top of the Trump wall, it can't be climbed...A 5th SFG team tried to scale it without hooks and rope and failed.
sfg? Spooky Fat Girls?..... SoFisticated Giraffes? It's not that hard to write out what you're trying to say.
 
sfg? Spooky Fat Girls?..... SoFisticated Giraffes? It's not that hard to write out what you're trying to say.

Good grief...Special Forces Group....Green Berets.... although Spooky Fat Girls has a certain ambience. :lol:
 
Democrats are mad because they have been going south to encourage foreign nationals to sneak into America with goodies like healthcare and welfare paid for by Americans, and trump is making it harder for them to sneak in and obtain these services paid for by Americans.
 
sfg? Spooky Fat Girls?..... SoFisticated Giraffes? It's not that hard to write out what you're trying to say.
Simulated Foreign Goons would be more accurate. Your guesses weren't even close.

So some random people pretending to be bad guys couldn't get over the fence. Big deal. Most of the folks at Walmart couldn't climb the fence around the lawn furniture section.
 
when will the stream stop
left wing nazis are starting to get upset that they have to take in those foriegn brown children


Cher derp part deux
August 24, 2019
Rich part of Washington, D.C. goes tooth-and-claw to prevent new child-migrant shelter in its neighborhood
By Monica Showalter
Putting on its Victorian gentleman suit (pace Tom Wolfe), the Washington Post's editorial board tut-tuts a rich part of Washington, D.C. and its political patrons, for pulling out all stops to prevent construction of a child-migrant shelter in its fancy environs.

MANY AMERICANS are rightly outraged by the Trump administration’s treatment of migrant children, who have been separated from parents and ill-treated by authorities. Democrats have been understandably eager to distance themselves from such policies — a stance that can result in knee-jerk opposition even to sensible practices in effect during the Obama administration.

That might explain the nearly uniform outcry from Washington-area politicians incensed at federal plans to build new shelters for migrant children in Northern Virginia and the District . The shelters, state-licensed and similar to scores across the county in operation since before President Trump took office, would help move migrant children out of squalid, cramped Border Patrol stations near the U.S.-Mexico border. They would provide a way station for unaccompanied minors while federal officials seek to place them with U.S.-based relatives or foster families.

But local politicians, nearly all Democrats, have balked at cooperating with federal authorities on any immigration matter. They have denounced the proposed new shelters with objections that smack of NIMBYism masquerading as humane concern for children. This month, the administration of D.C. Mayor Muriel E. Bowser (D) enacted emergency rules that blocked a planned federal shelter.
 

Forum List

Back
Top