400 Americans

hazlnut

Gold Member
Sep 18, 2012
12,387
1,923
290
Chicago
Have more wealth than half the population of the United States.


Hey Mr. Reagan, when exactly is this trickle down thing going to kick in?

Hey Mr. Bush, since the "job creators" still have the Tax Cut you gave them in 2002 and 2004, why aren't they, you know, creating more jobs?
 
Hey Mssrs. Clinton and Obama...

Your insipid post implies that these "400 Americans" have somehow stolen their wealth from half the population of the United States. Do you include Bill Gates in those 400? If so, please explain how his accumulation of wealth has deprived others of wealth. You may wait until Recess to respond.
 
Have more wealth than half the population of the United States.


Hey Mr. Reagan, when exactly is this trickle down thing going to kick in?

Hey Mr. Bush, since the "job creators" still have the Tax Cut you gave them in 2002 and 2004, why aren't they, you know, creating more jobs?
Kinda hard to do it with all the regs obutthurt has put on small businesses.
 
Have more wealth than half the population of the United States.


Hey Mr. Reagan, when exactly is this trickle down thing going to kick in?

Hey Mr. Bush, since the "job creators" still have the Tax Cut you gave them in 2002 and 2004, why aren't they, you know, creating more jobs?
You are an idiot.
 
Here's the thing. First, you have to establish a claim is true. If true, you then have to explain why what is claimed is a problem. Then, and here's the hard part, you have to recommend a solution.

Otherwise, you are wasting everyone's time.

 
Here's the thing. First, you have to establish a claim is true. If true, you then have to explain why what is claimed is a problem. Then, and here's the hard part, you have to recommend a solution.

Otherwise, you are wasting everyone's time.
That's too high a bar. IF that were the case every one of Hazlnut's post would be a waste of everyone's time.
Oh, wait.
 
the-butthurt-is-strong-with-this-one.jpg
 
Here's the thing. First, you have to establish a claim is true. If true, you then have to explain why what is claimed is a problem. Then, and here's the hard part, you have to recommend a solution.

Otherwise, you are wasting everyone's time.
That's too high a bar. IF that were the case every one of Hazlnut's post would be a waste of everyone's time.
Oh, wait.


Another non-response from the local troll.
 
Gee, under Reagan income inequality was much less than after 6 years of Obozo.

How come Reagan gets blamed for Obama's failed policies, even though Reagan was dead before Obama was even a name?
Very true

Income inequality under Reagan could hardly compare to today. After 30 years of Reagan supply side we can see the results
 
Gee, under Reagan income inequality was much less than after 6 years of Obozo.

How come Reagan gets blamed for Obama's failed policies, even though Reagan was dead before Obama was even a name?
Very true

Income inequality under Reagan could hardly compare to today. After 30 years of Reagan supply side we can see the results
If we had supply side, instead of MASS REDISTRIBUTION of MIDDLE CLASS WEALTH, we would be flying high, but no thanks to you Fascists in charge for almost 6 years now!
 
Have more wealth than half the population of the United States.


Hey Mr. Reagan, when exactly is this trickle down thing going to kick in?

Hey Mr. Bush, since the "job creators" still have the Tax Cut you gave them in 2002 and 2004, why aren't they, you know, creating more jobs?
Perhaps you could explain why you're entitled to that which you haven't earned.
 

Forum List

Back
Top