2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,334
- 52,582
- 2,290
See, this homeowner was in danger because three monsters broke into his home. He warned them to stop....they refused.....deciding that they would bet their lives on wether or not he would shoot......unlike Wesley Snipes....they didn't bet on black....and they were ventilated...and then assumed room temp.
Home Invasion Homeowner 2 but one ran away Extrano s Alley a gun blog
So.....this is why banning guns is stupid.....you have 3 violent home invaders vs. one innocent victim....without the gun he would have face the 3 attackers empty handed....and considering the advanced on a man pointing a gun at them....who warned them off....no telling what would have happened to that law abiding citizen....
A gun in the hands of an innocent victim evens out even 3 to 1 odds.....in favor of the one........
But....the anit gunners want that to happen....they want the 3 attackers to decide what they want to do to the victim and for the victim to have no recourse...but to submit to their violence....right?
Home Invasion Homeowner 2 but one ran away Extrano s Alley a gun blog
Briefly quoting the WMC report linked above:
When Mitchell and Atkins confronted the homeowner, he warned them to stop coming towards him, but they refused. The homeowner then fired multiple shots at Mitchell and Atkins, hitting both of them.
According to Memphis Police Department, when officers arrived at the location, they found both Mitchell and Atkins lying unresponsive inside with gunshot wounds. When Memphis Fire Department made the scene, they pronounced both men dead.
Police say a third burglary suspect was also inside the home, but ran away during the shooting.
The streets of Memphis are measurably safer tonight, and the local underworld has an object lesson in the wages of crime.
So kudos to the unnamed gun owner for a job well done, in accordance with the Christian tradition of self defense.
So.....this is why banning guns is stupid.....you have 3 violent home invaders vs. one innocent victim....without the gun he would have face the 3 attackers empty handed....and considering the advanced on a man pointing a gun at them....who warned them off....no telling what would have happened to that law abiding citizen....
A gun in the hands of an innocent victim evens out even 3 to 1 odds.....in favor of the one........
But....the anit gunners want that to happen....they want the 3 attackers to decide what they want to do to the victim and for the victim to have no recourse...but to submit to their violence....right?