2nd amendment sanctuaries are spreading, now counties in Kentucky are on board

[Deplorable Yankee]

A Second Amendment grassroots movement in Kentucky has some gun control advocates ‘triggered,’ to use a pun. As it stands, roughly six of the state’s counties have full-on declared themselves as Second Amendment sanctuary counties, with at least three dozen more likely to follow. Some of the notable counties in play are Hancock, Cumberland, Letcher, Knott, and Harlan.

Kentuckians Refusing Gun Law Compliance As Conflict Escalates


The US is rising up and times is coming where it looks like freedom is going to ring the Demonic losers HATE IT!! As they get more nervous watch wat the losers start doing ..........

View attachment 298541

Book Review: The Guerrilla Gunfighter Volume 2: Preparedness Rifle and Carbine (With Notes on the Virginia Gun Festivities) by John Meyers

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

"Now for wrath, now for ruin, and the red dawn!"

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

It's all just beginning.

They come for our guns and they will leave in body bags. Plain and simple.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Fuckin idiot. Nobody is coming for your guns, and if they did your shit your pants while handing them over.

It won't need to come to that because all of this will lead to the death of the Demonrat Party.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Who is violating federal law? What the hell are you talking about?

Some of y’all are so off the deep end can’t even have a regular human conversation with ya.

According to what you said, states should obey Federal weed laws until they are overturned, right?

So you are against states legalizing weed unless the federal laws are changed.

Should DOJ arrest all people working in dispensaries?

What are you talking about? States don’t obey federal weed laws, people do (or don’t). States don’t enforce federal weed laws, so if the state legalized pot, that just means they aren’t going to arrest people for weed. So yeah, the DoJ could arrest everyone working in dispensaries, but they won’t.

Do you want them arrested? Why or why not should Federal laws be followed or ignored without repercussions?

It raises an interesting question with regard to constitutionality of federal drug laws as applied to a dispensary which are operations which do not cross state lines. Personally, the DoJ has far bigger fish to fry and I’d prefer not to have them worry about it.

My feeling is that local laws should supersede Federal law and the local laws should be the law while being contested in court.

Weed should be a state law. Sanctuary cities are fine, but get the laws changed.

It should be a state decision, however, it violates the UN treaty our country signed onto in 1961. Thus far, it's been ignored, and so far, the feds are not pressured into enforcing it on our states. If that would happen, it would be a political nightmare for whoever is President at the time. It would put the President in a position of honoring the treaty and chance possible losing a lot of votes, or losing our reputation with the international community.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The NRA and Trump were supposed to implement nationwide carry permits.
Good in your hometown and good anywhere in the country, WTF happened to that?

Who wants to drive with a gun in the car when there is no reciprocity in all jurisdictions?

It's more of a problem than that. CCW laws are only as useful as the laws that back those people up. For instance, I would have no problem using deadly force in my state if need be. Our laws protect me in most circumstances. However, if we had reciprocity in NY or Cali, I would still be scared to death to use deadly force in those states. You may still get arrested and charged if their laws state you have to use every other possible option before deadly force.

Or perhaps unlike my state, you can only use a firearm to protect yourself, not anybody else. So if I seen an elderly man being attacked by a lunatic with a club in NYC, and I used my firearm to stop the attack, I may end up in prison for God knows how long. In my state, I'm permitted to use my firearm to stop such an attack.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I love this.

If Dimms can ignore Federal immigration laws, why can’t Cons ignore unconstitutional guns laws?

More of this. Fuck the left.

it’s actually pretty simple. Local law enforcement is tasked with enforcing state laws. Federal laws are enforced by federal law enforcement.

Sure. I think we agree on this.

So if my municipality wants to arrest illegal aliens and put them in jail, it’s legal and you support it.

Your municipality has no laws against illegal immigration. That is constitutionally speaking the sole discretion of the federal government.

Where in the Constitution does it say that? Immigration was not mentioned in the Constitution because there was no such thing as legal or illegal immigration at the time.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I love this.

If Dimms can ignore Federal immigration laws, why can’t Cons ignore unconstitutional guns laws?

More of this. Fuck the left.

it’s actually pretty simple. Local law enforcement is tasked with enforcing state laws. Federal laws are enforced by federal law enforcement.

Sure. I think we agree on this.

So if my municipality wants to arrest illegal aliens and put them in jail, it’s legal and you support it.

Not at all. During the DumBama administration, the frustrated people in Arizona did just that. DumBama took it to court and the court told Arizona they couldn't create their own illegal immigration laws.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

KY Counties Declare 2nd Amendment Sanctuary in Face of Dem Governor

Good. I hope this starts something just gonna take one overzealous moron democrat governor to push to far and start a war he/she can't stop.

There needs to be a head on collision with these Nazi ran states (and cities) that keep pushing their anti-gun laws on their people. It needs to be taken up with the Supreme Court, for them to decide once and for all.

 

[ColonelAngus]

I love this.

If Dimms can ignore Federal immigration laws, why can’t Cons ignore unconstitutional guns laws?

More of this. Fuck the left.

it’s actually pretty simple. Local law enforcement is tasked with enforcing state laws. Federal laws are enforced by federal law enforcement.

Sure. I think we agree on this.

So if my municipality wants to arrest illegal aliens and put them in jail, it’s legal and you support it.

Not at all. During the DumBama administration, the frustrated people in Arizona did just that. DumBama took it to court and the court told Arizona they couldn't create their own illegal immigration laws.

So if the Fed won’t enforce their own laws, the local municipalities can’t enforce them on behalf of the Fed?

That seems messed up.

 

[kyzr]

The NRA and Trump were supposed to implement nationwide carry permits.
Good in your hometown and good anywhere in the country, WTF happened to that?

Who wants to drive with a gun in the car when there is no reciprocity in all jurisdictions?

It's more of a problem than that. CCW laws are only as useful as the laws that back those people up. For instance, I would have no problem using deadly force in my state if need be. Our laws protect me in most circumstances. However, if we had reciprocity in NY or Cali, I would still be scared to death to use deadly force in those states. You may still get arrested and charged if their laws state you have to use every other possible option before deadly force.

Or perhaps unlike my state, you can only use a firearm to protect yourself, not anybody else. So if I seen an elderly man being attacked by a lunatic with a club in NYC, and I used my firearm to stop the attack, I may end up in prison for God knows how long. In my state, I'm permitted to use my firearm to stop such an attack.

I pay very close attention to the State reciprocity laws before I carry in the car. If there are any Iranian sympathizers about to attack some innocent folks it might be a good thing to have good guys with guns nearby who could stop it. But if there are local laws that hurt the good guy, can we make national laws like "anti-hate crime laws" that the Feds could save a good guy from a bad state or a bad municipality? The example I'm using is that even though a local was acquitted, the Feds could come in and charge him with a hate crime. We need a Federal get out of jail card for a righteous use of firearms.

 

[satrebil]

It's all just beginning.

They come for our guns and they will leave in body bags. Plain and simple.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Fuckin idiot. Nobody is coming for your guns, and if they did your shit your pants while handing them over.

Do you live under a fucking rock?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

It's all just beginning.

They come for our guns and they will leave in body bags. Plain and simple.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No one wants to ‘take’ anyone’s guns – the thread premise is a lie, plain and simple.

 

[MindWars]

What a dumb link from a prepper site no less. All it said was the usual claptrap about sanctuary counties for gun owners which is as stupid as it gets. Though I do understand that the last Republican governor pardoned some 400 perps as well as a few murderers and rapists. Maybe that has something to with this panic. This is Kentucky after all.

WHAT A REJECT WITH SHIT FOR BRAIS


YOU CONTINUOUSLY PROVE HOW FKN STUPID YOU TRUMP HATING IDIOTS ARE! YOU DO IT DAILY! Idiots like you solidify for the rest of us just how dumb you m . f . really are. lol

Second Amendment sanctuary action taking roots in Kentucky

 

[satrebil]

It's all just beginning.

They come for our guns and they will leave in body bags. Plain and simple.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No one wants to ‘take’ anyone’s guns – the thread premise is a lie, plain and simple.

'Hell, yes,' Beto O'Rourke's call to confiscate AR-15s pushes gun debate to new level

Idiot.

 

[regent]

It's possible that the gun holders will end up causing an amendment to the Constitution that will be the end of gun freedom--or America. So who will the military support, the government or NRAers? No question in my mind the that the military will support the government.

 

[satrebil]

It's possible that the gun holders will end up causing an amendment to the Constitution that will be the end of gun freedom--or America. So who will the military support, the government or NRAers? No question in my mind the that the military will support the government.

Well then you're a fool.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

It's possible that the gun holders will end up causing an amendment to the Constitution that will be the end of gun freedom--or America. So who will the military support, the government or NRAers? No question in my mind the that the military will support the government.

You have better chances at hitting the Lotto than seeing a Constitutional amendment of any kind in our lifetime. America is separating. The left went from liberalism, to progressivism, to Democrat Socialism, whatever the hell that is. From there, they will go to just Socialism, then Socialism-Communism, and then just Communism.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I love this.

If Dimms can ignore Federal immigration laws, why can’t Cons ignore unconstitutional guns laws?

More of this. Fuck the left.

it’s actually pretty simple. Local law enforcement is tasked with enforcing state laws. Federal laws are enforced by federal law enforcement.

Sure. I think we agree on this.

So if my municipality wants to arrest illegal aliens and put them in jail, it’s legal and you support it.

Not at all. During the DumBama administration, the frustrated people in Arizona did just that. DumBama took it to court and the court told Arizona they couldn't create their own illegal immigration laws.

So if the Fed won’t enforce their own laws, the local municipalities can’t enforce them on behalf of the Fed?

That seems messed up.

Agreed, but that's how the court ruled. Arizona had to scrap their new laws because of that court order. Prior to that, industry was reporting over half their crew didn't show up for work. Schools were reporting most of their students didn't attend. The illegals all got the hell out of town. Once DumBama had that reversed, of course, they all returned again.

But Democrats don't want open borders.............right.......