270 to Win Presidential Election Simulator shows Obama winning!

[Darkwind]

Presidential election simulator.

Click the link and watch the electoral map fill in. Even with Romney winning many swing states, Obama still wins the electoral vote.

It's a random generator, dumb ass. Look what I got after 3 runs...

Learn to actually read your sources... shit for brains...

The simulator is not a predictor of the election. It provides a range of electoral outcomes that are plausible if the election were today, if the state polls were accurate and if each state were a fully independent event. The election is still months away; state polling is still infrequent and may be ‘stale’. While each state is, in theory, a separate election, the reality is that there are usually correlations. For example, if Obama were to win Georgia, he wouldn’t lose Virginia. However, something like that is possible in a given simulation. As a result, this model underplays the likelihood of toss-up states breaking heavily for one candidate.

Its amazing...This should have been the end of this thread. Yet....

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Presidential election simulator.

Click the link and watch the electoral map fill in. Even with Romney winning many swing states, Obama still wins the electoral vote.

That’s likely close to the outcome; even if Romney wins Virginia and Florida, with either Iowa or Nevada Obama wins re-election with 271 EC votes.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

You will get different results based on polls and methods mentioned above. In every case Obama is shown to win. I suppose if you had nothing better to do than run it dozens of times, it might show Romney winning occasionally. I ran it 28 times and Obama won every time from about 289 to 332 electoral votes.

No not in every case does it show obama winning

I just said that--but the vast majority of simulations do show him winning.

Someone mentioned no way will Obama win NC as if that were the determining factor. One simulation showed him winning NC but others not. However he did win other needed states in 99% of the simulations, including NC occasionally.

I don't give a damn how many simulation you use, North Carolina is not going obama, it was a 50/50 split with all the hopey changy drunks out their in 2008. The vote was so close McCain if he had any balls could have challenged the vote count. And now we have all the obama failure's his support for gay marriage, blacks around here don't support him as much.

 

[Conservative]

On the deaths of Americans in the embassy in Libya...

Quote: Originally Posted by francoHFW
This is a learning experience for couple of fledgling democracies...

That is not what I was talking about, you lying Pub dupe POS. "a couple of fledgling democracies"? _-That doesn't even make any sense, you typical piece of Pubcrappe...

unrelated post. Please stay on topic.

However, since you did bring it up... NEENER NEENER NEENER!!!!!!!!

The link to the post is there for everyone to see exactly what context you said it in. Can't hide from that, Dimocrat dupe

 

[Conservative]

Methodology We take current state-by-state polls and turn the results into probabilities. Each simulation picks a winner in each individual state, based on the probabilities for that state. For example, if Romney has a 55% chance of winning Nevada, he will, in the long run, win Nevada in 55% of the simulations conducted. Some uncontested states (e.g., Utah) will always yield the same result. The simulator does not consider the possibility of split electoral votes in Maine or Nebraska.

The simulator is not a predictor of the election. It provides a range of electoral outcomes that are plausible if the election were today, if the state polls were accurate and if each state were a fully independent event. The election is still months away; state polling is still infrequent and may be ‘stale’. While each state is, in theory, a separate election, the reality is that there are usually correlations. For example, if Obama were to win Georgia, he wouldn’t lose Virginia. However, something like that is possible in a given simulation. As a result, this model underplays the likelihood of toss-up states breaking heavily for one candidate.

You will get different results based on polls and methods mentioned above. In every case Obama is shown to win. I suppose if you had nothing better to do than run it dozens of times, it might show Romney winning occasionally. I ran it 28 times and Obama won every time from about 289 to 332 electoral votes.

You're a lying sack of whale excrement. I already posted a screenshot of it showing Romney winning. Additionally, I just tried it 10 times, and Romney won 6 out of 10.

You FAIL.

 

[Listening]

Methodology We take current state-by-state polls and turn the results into probabilities. Each simulation picks a winner in each individual state, based on the probabilities for that state. For example, if Romney has a 55% chance of winning Nevada, he will, in the long run, win Nevada in 55% of the simulations conducted. Some uncontested states (e.g., Utah) will always yield the same result. The simulator does not consider the possibility of split electoral votes in Maine or Nebraska.

The simulator is not a predictor of the election. It provides a range of electoral outcomes that are plausible if the election were today, if the state polls were accurate and if each state were a fully independent event. The election is still months away; state polling is still infrequent and may be ‘stale’. While each state is, in theory, a separate election, the reality is that there are usually correlations. For example, if Obama were to win Georgia, he wouldn’t lose Virginia. However, something like that is possible in a given simulation. As a result, this model underplays the likelihood of toss-up states breaking heavily for one candidate.

You will get different results based on polls and methods mentioned above. In every case Obama is shown to win. I suppose if you had nothing better to do than run it dozens of times, it might show Romney winning occasionally. I ran it 28 times and Obama won every time from about 289 to 332 electoral votes.

You are just like Ed Shultz who is now openly ejaculating on his show he's so wound up about getting his ass kicked.

This is hysterical. Polsters are not continuing in some swing states because their early election data pretty much says (based on whose requested) that it's over for Obama.

How's it feel to see the spring srping.

RCP has Romney up by +1 and that ain't stopping.

I watched some b**ch from N.O.W. (what a misnomer that is) on Ed's show....she was almost pissing her pantyhose she was so keyed up about the abortion "flip flop".

I love it.

 

[courseofhistory]

Republicans on this forum for the most part are disgustingly out of touch like their leader and belittle themselves beyond belief with the terrible language and lack of discussion skills. Carry on!

I just ran the simulator again for today's polls and out of 40 runs (over a period of an hour or so) Obama won every time. So, the lying sack of whale ******** poster doesn't tell the truth! Nothing new there!

 

[hazlnut]

Presidential election simulator.

Click the link and watch the electoral map fill in. Even with Romney winning many swing states, Obama still wins the electoral vote.

Dude I can tell you right now no way in hell is North Carolina going obama, and your little map shows North Carolina going obama.

Incoming Butthurt!!!

 

[Listening]

Presidential election simulator.

Click the link and watch the electoral map fill in. Even with Romney winning many swing states, Obama still wins the electoral vote.

Dude I can tell you right now no way in hell is North Carolina going obama, and your little map shows North Carolina going obama.

Let him dream, it's all he has left.

Wet dream.....

Looks like the end of the gravy train for the freeloaders.

 

[blackhawk]

This is from the OP link.

The simulator is not a predictor of the election. It provides a range of electoral outcomes that are plausible if the election were today, if the state polls were accurate and if each state were a fully independent event. The election is still months away; state polling is still infrequent and may be ‘stale’. While each state is, in theory, a separate election, the reality is that there are usually correlations. For example, if Obama were to win Georgia, he wouldn’t lose Virginia. However, something like that is possible in a given simulation. As a result, this model underplays the likelihood of toss-up states breaking heavily for one candidate.

There is one passage in this that is important the part where it say's the election is still month's away given it is not months away it makes you wonder just when was the last time this thing was updated.

 

[Obamanation]

Republicans on this forum for the most part are disgustingly out of touch like their leader and belittle themselves beyond belief with the terrible language and lack of discussion skills. Carry on!

I just ran the simulator again for today's polls and out of 40 runs (over a period of an hour or so) Obama won every time. So, the lying sack of whale ******** poster doesn't tell the truth! Nothing new there!

Well, thats all the proof you need --- join the milions upon millions of disgrunted leftists and stay home instead of voting. You will see what happens when it counts for real.

 

[Conservative]

Presidential election simulator.

Click the link and watch the electoral map fill in. Even with Romney winning many swing states, Obama still wins the electoral vote.

Dude I can tell you right now no way in hell is North Carolina going obama, and your little map shows North Carolina going obama.

Incoming Butthurt!!!

'incoming'... 'butthurt' ???

I see what you did there. Still negged ya for it though

 

[Conservative]

Republicans on this forum for the most part are disgustingly out of touch like their leader and belittle themselves beyond belief with the terrible language and lack of discussion skills. Carry on!

I just ran the simulator again for today's polls and out of 40 runs (over a period of an hour or so) Obama won every time. So, the lying sack of whale ******** poster doesn't tell the truth! Nothing new there!

you're still a lying sack of whale excrement.

 

[blackhawk]

I ran the thing four times got different results every time you might as well use a slot machine to pick the winner your odds would be about the same as this thing.

 

[courseofhistory]

Republicans on this forum for the most part are disgustingly out of touch like their leader and belittle themselves beyond belief with the terrible language and lack of discussion skills. Carry on!

I just ran the simulator again for today's polls and out of 40 runs (over a period of an hour or so) Obama won every time. So, the lying sack of whale ******** poster doesn't tell the truth! Nothing new there!

you're still a lying sack of whale excrement.

Can dish it out but can't take it huh? You have to neg me to show your manhood which you probably have a hard time getting up! Does it give you a hard on, asshole?

 

[CaféAuLait]

I ran it twice, first time Obama won and the second Romney won.

 

[Conservative]

Republicans on this forum for the most part are disgustingly out of touch like their leader and belittle themselves beyond belief with the terrible language and lack of discussion skills. Carry on!

I just ran the simulator again for today's polls and out of 40 runs (over a period of an hour or so) Obama won every time. So, the lying sack of whale ******** poster doesn't tell the truth! Nothing new there!

you're still a lying sack of whale excrement.

Can dish it out but can't take it huh? You have to neg me to show your manhood which you probably have a hard time getting up! Does it give you a hard on, asshole?

you realize I always neg people for whining about getting negged... right? See you in 48 hours, asshat

 

[Conservative]

I ran it twice, first time Obama won and the second Romney won.

(In best courseofhistory voice) Liar! You Photoshopped that image! It's obvious.

 

[Meister]

Methodology We take current state-by-state polls and turn the results into probabilities. Each simulation picks a winner in each individual state, based on the probabilities for that state. For example, if Romney has a 55% chance of winning Nevada, he will, in the long run, win Nevada in 55% of the simulations conducted. Some uncontested states (e.g., Utah) will always yield the same result. The simulator does not consider the possibility of split electoral votes in Maine or Nebraska.

The simulator is not a predictor of the election. It provides a range of electoral outcomes that are plausible if the election were today, if the state polls were accurate and if each state were a fully independent event. The election is still months away; state polling is still infrequent and may be ‘stale’. While each state is, in theory, a separate election, the reality is that there are usually correlations. For example, if Obama were to win Georgia, he wouldn’t lose Virginia. However, something like that is possible in a given simulation. As a result, this model underplays the likelihood of toss-up states breaking heavily for one candidate.

You will get different results based on polls and methods mentioned above. In every case Obama is shown to win. I suppose if you had nothing better to do than run it dozens of times, it might show Romney winning occasionally. I ran it 28 times and Obama won every time from about 289 to 332 electoral votes.

You do realize that that is a left wing site....right?

 

[Lovebears65]

The OP does a lot of fail post ..

Presidential election simulator.

Click the link and watch the electoral map fill in. Even with Romney winning many swing states, Obama still wins the electoral vote.

It's a random generator, dumb ass. Look what I got after 3 runs...

Learn to actually read your sources... shit for brains...

The simulator is not a predictor of the election. It provides a range of electoral outcomes that are plausible if the election were today, if the state polls were accurate and if each state were a fully independent event. The election is still months away; state polling is still infrequent and may be ‘stale’. While each state is, in theory, a separate election, the reality is that there are usually correlations. For example, if Obama were to win Georgia, he wouldn’t lose Virginia. However, something like that is possible in a given simulation. As a result, this model underplays the likelihood of toss-up states breaking heavily for one candidate.