candycorn
Diamond Member
No, the Commission Report about the attacks. Since WTC 7 wasn't attacked it shouldn't have been in the report.
Gee, the investigated lies to investigators and you act like this never happens. If this was a barrier to a full and accurate report, no investigation into any act that may have consequences would be considered full and accurate. The investigated always try to show themselves in the best light or cover for others. I'm sure your boss asks you questions (probably every day) about your poor performance and, judging from the way you sound, you are full of excuses and diversions. At no point does Farmer say it was an inside job. You left that out.
Tom Kean stands by his commission's report.
It is the only version of events that makes any sense. Perhaps YOU can tell us where you disagree with some of it Jess...You did read it didn't you? I'm guessing not.
Because that isn't the case at all; you're the one calling it "bullshit" and as we all know, the only bullshit in the conversation is between your ears.
I quote people that were involved in writing the Omission Report, and you still deny and argue that it is not a flawed investigation. You are a shill and a traitor, and a coward. You're all over the internet on different sites spewing the same denial and disinformation tactics. You are a boot licking treasonous little whore.
No, you mis-quote them; not once do they call it "bullshit" yet you say they do.
Sounds like the report you all worship and agree with is being called bullshit by the very ones who were involved in putting it together.
See, you're lying.
Anyway, feel free to get to work on your narrative little boy. We both know you're way too much of a pussy to take a stand; cowards like you never do.
Check please!