TakeAStepBack
Gold Member
- Mar 29, 2011
- 13,935
- 1,742
- 245
Pointing out logical fallacy is not obfuscating. What it is, is pointing out logical fallacy. Which you seem to have nothing else here.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Post hoc ergo propter hoc.
Pointing out logical fallacy is not obfuscating. What it is, is pointing out logical fallacy. Which you seem to have nothing else here.
This repeating isn't make the argument any more logical.
It is if you understand that tax cuts, QE and bailouts don't stimulate the economy alone. It takes an overall fiscal/monetary/economic policy to make that happen.
It's not "because this, then this." Or Post hoc ergo propter hoc.
Only people that believe politicians would repeat such nonsense.
why they are drawn to historically failed ideas is the mystery
For 12 years the "job creators" got every single thing they wanted. Low taxes, ease on regulations, changes in overtime rules, bailouts, quantitative easing..and what do we have?
Stagnant wages, high unemployment, and..
A record number of billionaires!
Why is that?
Going to score the verbal gymnastics used to explain it.
Interesting I've always considered a healthy sign when we produce A record number of billionaires!
The more rich the better
Interesting I've always considered a healthy sign when we produce A record number of billionaires!
The more rich the better
...you are aware that there's a finite amount of wealth which means the more billionares, the more people in the middle and bottom are getting fucked.
so the middle class is useless and only billionaires matter?
see why you cant win elections