Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Again those those numbers dishonestly exclude the OFF BUDGET DEFICIT SPENDING!!!!!!!!!!!!
After beginning with a Clinton-era surplus of $128 billion in fiscal year 2001, the Bush administration racked up deficits of $158 billion in 2002, $378 billion in 2003, $413 billion in 2004, $318 billion in 2005, $248 billion in 2006, $162 billion in 2007, and $410 billion in 2008.
Again the dishonest Heritage Foundation phony deficit chart which leaves out Bush's OFF BUDGET DEFICIT SPENDING. 2008 alone had $1 TRILLION in OFF BUDGET DEFICIT SPENDING!!!!!!!!And for extra good pwny measure, Ima expose CS's sad attempt @ a rebuttal (FROM CBS) as BS:
Budget 2011: Past Deficits vs. Obamas Deficits
The chart is a perfect example of how STUPID and GULLIBLE a person must be to be a CON$ervative. Off budget DEFICIT SPENDING is NOT "deficit spending!"
The federal government has accumulated more new debt--$3.22 trillion ($3,220,103,625,307.29)during the tenure of the 111th Congress than it did during the first 100 Congresses combined, according to official debt figures published by the U.S. Treasury."
your exact words moron, you said the $3.22 trillion worth of debt is more than the first 100 combined.
show me a news source not called the foundry, or fox news or sean hannity that backs this up?
then also show me how the bush years stack up to this congress, then again you also have to add in the wars, which he doesnt do. once again, nice fuzzy math.
Ive pwned your ass so many times its ridiculous. your article stated Obama added $3.22 Trillion to the US debt, and claimed it was more than all other congresses combined. while i simply pwned you by showing and proving that GWB added $4 trillion to debt. hmmmm basic math shows that $4 trillion is more than $3.22 trillion.
and your idea of privatization of SS lacked an real substance or spending controls. you simply wanted to give the tax dollars form SS to bankers on wall street. yup, after the govt had to bail them out, great idea jackass.
youre not only a failure, but an epic failure.
^^^^^^^
Ima give you one last chance to save some face here sheep. Not only are you unable to refute my facts, continue to deflect in that you're tryna talk bout GWB instead of HIS Congress which spent NOWHERE NEAR as much as the 111th, but my last post blows your silly CBS math outta the water.
I have posted recent, accurate, objective, factual, varied responses after being called out here. They really can't be refuted, as anyone who actually took the time to read that whole post would see THEY'RE COLD, HARD FACTS.
I have obviously more than proved my main point (deficit) "Common Sense" even admitted that.
He has little credibility left as anything else he posts will likely be as irrelevant, bias, or flawed as his 1st CBS link.
I dunno why Carb is here, that's the same sheep I megapwned with my Gallup poll after he claimed conservatism was "dead"
I shall tho be checking back in on this thread regularly, hopefully SOMEONE will FINALLY arrive with some real points..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
The recent tax bill adds almost a trillion to the debt and the GOP, not to mention the rightwingers here, supported it overwhelmingly.
The recent tax bill adds almost a trillion to the debt and the GOP, not to mention the rightwingers here, supported it overwhelmingly.
you did not think they were really conservatives did you?
Yeah, and the excuse the dimwits used it would add to the deficit, but they didn't care about that when they pushed the screw America socialist health care bill through under a bunch of lies. Idiots!!!!The recent tax bill adds almost a trillion to the debt and the GOP, not to mention the rightwingers here, supported it overwhelmingly.
Yeah, and the excuse the dimwits used it would add to the deficit, but they didn't care about that when they pushed the screw America socialist health care bill through under a bunch of lies. Idiots!!!!The recent tax bill adds almost a trillion to the debt and the GOP, not to mention the rightwingers here, supported it overwhelmingly.
Obviously that is a list of posters who have pwned YOU!Again the dishonest Heritage Foundation phony deficit chart which leaves out Bush's OFF BUDGET DEFICIT SPENDING. 2008 alone had $1 TRILLION in OFF BUDGET DEFICIT SPENDING!!!!!!!!And for extra good pwny measure, Ima expose CS's sad attempt @ a rebuttal (FROM CBS) as BS:
Budget 2011: Past Deficits vs. Obamas Deficits
The chart is a perfect example of how STUPID and GULLIBLE a person must be to be a CON$ervative. Off budget DEFICIT SPENDING is NOT "deficit spending!"
Welcome to the pwned list, you sad, nit picking troll.http://washingtonexaminer.com/politics/2009/02/obamas-trillions-dwarf-bushs-dangerous-spending
Yeah, and the excuse the dimwits used it would add to the deficit, but they didn't care about that when they pushed the screw America socialist health care bill through under a bunch of lies. Idiots!!!!The recent tax bill adds almost a trillion to the debt and the GOP, not to mention the rightwingers here, supported it overwhelmingly.
Know what else is great, good for a LOL?
The lefty sheep here are raving bout some "off budget deficit" BS and the cost of the war WHEN OBAMA HAS ALREADY, LONG SINCE, MADE AFGHANISTAN HIS WAR.
He's expanded it, approved the funding, etc.
The lefties here do seem to be gettin desperate.
Better add that shit to HIS column, but they won't. Judging from the collective IQ amassed by the left here, they likely still think GWB is still in office and "planting WMDs in Iraq"
Obviously that is a list of posters who have pwned YOU!Again the dishonest Heritage Foundation phony deficit chart which leaves out Bush's OFF BUDGET DEFICIT SPENDING. 2008 alone had $1 TRILLION in OFF BUDGET DEFICIT SPENDING!!!!!!!!
The chart is a perfect example of how STUPID and GULLIBLE a person must be to be a CON$ervative. Off budget DEFICIT SPENDING is NOT "deficit spending!"
Welcome to the pwned list, you sad, nit picking troll.http://washingtonexaminer.com/politics/2009/02/obamas-trillions-dwarf-bushs-dangerous-spending
And just to put the cherry on top, Obama"s first fiscal budget, 2010, was LESS than Bush's last fiscal budget.
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_10/026151.php
October 15, 2010
DEFICIT SHRINKS FROM LAST YEAR'S RECORD.... Deficit hawks probably won't be pleased with the total, but they should at least be pleased with the direction.
The federal government budget deficit shrank in fiscal 2010, but the big gap was only $122 billion lower than the record high set a year ago.If this sounds familiar, it's because the Congressional Budget Office reported on its estimate of the federal budget deficit for FY2010 would just last week. Today's Treasury report is the official deficit tally, though as it turns out, the CBO projection was almost on the nose.
The U.S. spent $1.294 trillion more than it collected in the fiscal year that ended Sept. 30, the Treasury Department said Friday.
The deficit amounted to 8.9% of gross domestic product. That's down from fiscal 2009, when the deficit of $1.416 trillion was 10.0% of GDP.
Spending fell and revenues rose in fiscal 2010 as the economy recovered from the deep recession that contributed to the nation's troubled fiscal condition.
The $1.294 trillion shortfall is smaller than last year's total; it's slightly lower than the deficit President Obama inherited from his predecessor; and the final figure was smaller than projections made by the administration and the CBO earlier this year.
Want to have some fun? Ask your favorite Tea Partier whether the deficit they claim to care so much about is higher or lower now than when Obama took office. They won't care for the answer, but it's true.
show me a news source not called the foundry, or fox news or sean hannity that backs this up?
then also show me how the bush years stack up to this congress, then again you also have to add in the wars, which he doesnt do. once again, nice fuzzy math.