10-U.S. Diplomatic Missions Attacked. 60-U.S. Diplomatic Personnel Killed Under Bush

[ame=http://youtube.com/watch?v=l5ilCnHiAPs]C-SPAN: House Benghazi Hearing -- State Department Officials' Opening Statements - YouTube[/ame]

Gregory Hicks and Eric Nordstrom opening statements
 
The entire Benghazi investigation is doing that. That's why cons can't get it to pick up any traction in the mainstream.

Because for some inexplicable reason they expect everyone to believe that all of a sudden, and completely out of nowhere, they care about Americans dying in the field.

Guess what nobody's buying it :cool:

So the defense for the Benghazi lie is based on "You didn't mind it a bit when it happened under Bush"???
Even though you still FAIL at link-quoting a single person that lied or diminished an attack on Americans

The defense for Benghazi is that terrorists attacked and we should learn from it and be better prepared in the future.

That republicans "didn't mind it a bit when it happened under Bush" is just a coincidence.

What about the administration's lies about what happened? Do you have a defense for that too?
 
President Bush didnt lie and tell others to lie; or cover-up anything about the embassy attacks on his watch


try again
 
President Bush didnt lie and tell others to lie; or cover-up anything about the embassy attacks on his watch


try again

60 US diplomats didn't die either. All this diversion is, is the flying monkeys flinging their own poop.
 
So the defense for the Benghazi lie is based on "You didn't mind it a bit when it happened under Bush"???
Even though you still FAIL at link-quoting a single person that lied or diminished an attack on Americans

The defense for Benghazi is that terrorists attacked and we should learn from it and be better prepared in the future.

That republicans "didn't mind it a bit when it happened under Bush" is just a coincidence.

What about the administration's lies about what happened? Do you have a defense for that too?

Flying monkeys don't need to defend anything they won the election obviously that means no one cares. I just hope that the stuff the flying monkeys are flinging someday hits the fan.
 
https://www.facebook.com/TheBlueStr...5272475307822/162977380537331/?type=1&theater.

Not including the attacks of September 11, 2001, there were world wide, Ten (10) Attacks on U.S. Diplomatic Missions that resulted the deaths of Sixty (60) U.S. Diplomatic Personnel between January 2002 and September 2008.

At no time in that Six (06) Year Period were there demands from Republicans for Investigations into those attacks made against U.S. Diplomatic Personnel.

At no time in that Six (06) Year Period were there demands from Republicans for Investigations into the death of the Sixty (60) U.S. Diplomatic Personnel Killed in those attacks.

At no time in that Six Year (06)Period did Democrats attempt to politicize the Ten (10) Attacks on U.S. Diplomatic Missions under bush43.

At no time in that Six (06) Year Period did Democrats attempt to politicize the Sixty (60) Attacks on U.S. Diplomatic Missions under bush43.

Republicans (Including Darryl Issa, John Boehner and Eric Cantor) voted against Millions of Dollars needed to upgrade security for U.S. Diplomatic Missions World Wide.

The current version of MANUFACTURED OUTRAGE over Benghazi is exactly that....MANUFACTURED OUTRAGE

Geez...not this Liberal bullshit again.

How many of those dead were Ambassadors?
How many of those incidents did Bush cover up?

Liberal stinkbug, clogging up the forum with Leftist bullshit.

Like I said earlier in the thread. Republicans don't give the tiniest fuck about those deaths

In other words, you can't answer my questions, so you'll just respond by lashing out at Republicans with a standard Liberal meme.
 
It's all they've got. Look at the number of Benghazi threads the lefties have started. All of them follow the same theme: Bush was worse, it doesn't matter, BUsh was worse.

Their moral equivalence fails them here. Because Bush was not worse. Bush wasn't even in the same league as the HNIC.
But think of that for a minute. Their excuse for everything is that Bush, whom they vilify as the worst president, did it first. What does that say about Obama? He's the second-worst president ever?
 

Forum List

Back
Top