Soupnazi630
Gold Member
- Dec 9, 2013
- 17,946
- 5,211
- 265
Yes they are and you are wrong about themYes it does actually.Um yes unethical does not equal abuse.It was accurate not stupid which is why you failed to address it much less refute it.
I can agree that it was unethical but unethical does not equate to ABUSE nor does it erase the consensual nature of the affair.
I do not question the veracity of an accuser but the accused has every right to do so. That is part of due process which is not a straw man.
Rape accusers should be treated with empathy but also carefully and objectively investigated to protect people from false accusations.
Unethical does not equate abuse? Do you ever listen to yourself talk?
So if your employer made advances towards you, with the notion that if you don't comply you will get fired, that is not abuse?
Do tell.
As for your ilk who supported the Clintons, Hillary did nothing but attack the veracity of the women who came after Bill, including Lewinsky.
Hillary Clinton’s Long History of Targeting Women - Washington Free Beacon
Face it, you and the Left have been exposed as having zero morals and drowning in hypocrisy.
Your credibility is shot.,
My credibility is not shot yours is
Your analogy is a fail. If my boss made such advances and I accepted because I wanted to sleep with her we would both be doing something unethical but it would not be abuse.
Abuse by definition is criminal behavior which harms another.
Ethics are something else which you clearly need to educate yourself on.
I was clearly in partial agreement with some of what you said but your statement of Clinton abusing Lewinsky is FALSE.
It was consensual and therefore not abuse and the ethics of it does not change that fact.
The fact that it was consensual between a superior and subordinate does not change that it is sexual harassment according to federal law.
How long have you worked for the federal government? You are spouting bullshit just like a libtard. The rules are VERY specific.