1,600-plus Scientists Say Climate "Emergency" Is a Myth

[Toddsterpatriot]

Why the U.S. government plans to spend billions to keep money-losing nuclear plants open

The U.S. government is spending billions of dollars to prop up some money-losing nuclear plants, which it needs to stay open to meet its clean energy goals.

www.cnbc.com

Yep, ignore all the noise. Follow The Money!

As we’ll hear today, the United States subsidizes the fossil fuel industry with taxpayer dollars. It’s not just the US: according to the International Energy Agency, fossil fuel handouts hit a global high of $1 trillion in 2022 – the same year Big Oil pulled in a record $4 trillion of income.

That's awful!

How much of that $1 trillion is the government buying fuel for poor people?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

And he sucks hard at climate science. I'm much, much better at it than he is.

Remember, you can't gaslight people who aren't cult fuktards. You're essentially telling me to believe that 2+2=5 because some important names said so.

And he sucks hard at climate science. I'm much, much better at it than he is.

What did he get wrong? Be specific.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Physics. What the hell does that have to do with climate change?

Try explaining AGW without physics.

 

[Lastamender]

Over 1,600 scientists, including two Nobel Peace Prize winners, have signed a declaration that says that the claim of a climate "emergency" is a myth.

More than 1,600 scientists, including two Nobel laureates, declare climate 'emergency' a myth

EXCERPT:

A coalition of 1,609 scientists from around the world have signed a declaration stating “there is no climate emergency” and that they “strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy” being pushed across the globe. The declaration does not deny the harmful effect of greenhouse gasses, but instead challenges the hysteria brought about by the narrative of imminent doom. . . .

“Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of their policy measures,” the declaration says.

That works for me. No more green bullshit. It has killed our economy.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

That works for me. No more green bullshit. It has killed our economy.

Yeah, but temps will be 0.01 degrees lower in 2100.

Totally worth it, just ask AOC.

 

[Lastamender]

Yeah, but temps will be 0.01 degrees lower in 2100.

Totally worth it, just ask AOC.

AOC is someone you tell, not ask.

 

[Oddball]

 

[ding]

Cool. A group of people with much less climate knowledge that I have is talking out of their butts for political reasons. Nobody cares.

The rational people talk about the science. The political-driven crazies rave about their various conspiracies. That's because, since all of the science directly contradicts them, they can't talk about the science.

Go on, deniers. Scream some more about socialism. Go down the list of your cult's talking points. That'll show 'em how rational you are.

I do agree, follow the money. All of the corrupting bribe money flows to denier scammers, thus all of the fraud and garbage pseudoscience comes form the denier side. No "scientist" embraces something as reality-defying as denialism unless they're getting paid to do so.

Flawed computer models aren't science.

 

[Weatherman2020]

A coalition of 1,609 scientists from around the world have signed a declaration stating “there is no climate emergency” and that they “strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy” being pushed across the globe. The declaration does not deny the harmful effect of greenhouse gasses, but instead challenges the hysteria brought about by the narrative of imminent doom.

More than 1,600 scientists, including two Nobel laureates, declare climate 'emergency' a myth

The global coalition of scientists say that politics and a journalistic frenzy has propelled a doomsday climate change hysteria. The signatories also ask other scientists to "address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming."

justthenews.com

What goes around comes around. The Klimate Kult set the bar on what’s required and it’s come around. Good and harder.
Karma.

 

[Blues Man]

Thereâs far more scientific fraud than anyone wants to admit | Ivan Oransky and Adam Marcus

Despite recent scandals of research misconduct and error, the academic world still seems determined to look the other way

www.theguardian.com

 

[DGS49]

Scientific reality is not determined by popular vote, and I'm very skeptical about a poll of "scientists" when that term is not clearly defined. I am often reminded about the study funded by Congress in the early 1900's, in which the leading physical scientists of the day concluded that heavier-than-air flight was still a hundred years away. Fortunately, two bicycle mechanics from Dayton failed to read the report.

 

[FA_Q2]

These mass signature pages are almost always bullshit. Just looking at the forst 4 names on the list we get 3 phisicists and one that is not even a scientist.

So we have an outright lie and 3 people that are not climatologists. Generally, I would agree with the sentiment as the statement AGW is an 'emergency' is highly problematic in its own right. What is an 'emergency?" The world is not ending and AGW is not going to wipe out life as we know it. That does not mean it is not happening or that there are things we need to be doing to deal with it. However, when an article or report opens with lies and half truths, there is no reason to take it seriously.

 

[1srelluc]

 

[elektra]

These mass signature pages are almost always bullshit. Just looking at the forst 4 names on the list we get 3 phisicists and one that is not even a scientist.

So we have an outright lie and 3 people that are not climatologists. Generally, I would agree with the sentiment as the statement AGW is an 'emergency' is highly problematic in its own right. What is an 'emergency?" The world is not ending and AGW is not going to wipe out life as we know it. That does not mean it is not happening or that there are things we need to be doing to deal with it. However, when an article or report opens with lies and half truths, there is no reason to take it seriously.

what is the lie?

 

[Donald H]

Yes, we have to parrot science. None of us are experts and you shouldn't be pretending to be one.

 

[Grumblenuts]

As we’ll hear today, the United States subsidizes the fossil fuel industry with taxpayer dollars. It’s not just the US: according to the International Energy Agency, fossil fuel handouts hit a global high of $1 trillion in 2022 – the same year Big Oil pulled in a record $4 trillion of income.

That's awful!

How much of that $1 trillion is the government buying fuel for poor people?

Why do you want "the government buying fuel for poor people?"
Oh, you're just trolling again. Never mind.

Yep, ignore all the noise. Follow The Money!

 

[Billiejeens]

Yes, we have to parrot science. None of us are experts and you shouldn't be pretending to be one.

The hoaxers shouldn't be pretending

 

[Weatherman2020]

Scientific reality is not determined by popular vote, and I'm very skeptical about a poll of "scientists" when that term is not clearly defined. I am often reminded about the study funded by Congress in the early 1900's, in which the leading physical scientists of the day concluded that heavier-than-air flight was still a hundred years away. Fortunately, two bicycle mechanics from Dayton failed to read the report.

Science IS determined by a popular vote.
At least that’s the bullshit the klimate kult has been spewing for the last decade.

 

[Weatherman2020]

These mass signature pages are almost always bullshit. Just looking at the forst 4 names on the list we get 3 phisicists and one that is not even a scientist.

So we have an outright lie and 3 people that are not climatologists. Generally, I would agree with the sentiment as the statement AGW is an 'emergency' is highly problematic in its own right. What is an 'emergency?" The world is not ending and AGW is not going to wipe out life as we know it. That does not mean it is not happening or that there are things we need to be doing to deal with it. However, when an article or report opens with lies and half truths, there is no reason to take it seriously.

If you want to claim it’s not a crisis then tell the klimate kult to stop trying to gut the economy.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

That works for me. No more green bullshit. It has killed our economy.

Fumes Fumigate

It will kill us, too. Natural air, which the superstitious enemies of scientific progress call "Clean Air," is the most toxic of all atmospheres humans have had to survive in.