docmauser1
Gold Member
- Oct 8, 2010
- 7,274
- 698
- 190
Funny, UN drivel mentiones "peace in the mideast", "stability in the mideast", "(drivel) in the mideast" too, it doesn't mean "mideast" is some state.The agreements mentioned Palestine many times.Do those "actual UN documents by Yale" tell us what arab state of palistan signed them too? Palestine is a loose geographical area without borders, on which no arab state of palistan ever existed in history to claim any borders, and where the british mandate palestine, organized by brits with british administrative borders (which included Jordan), has been kaputski since 1948. of course.Let's see, who to believe, who to believe???? The posting of actual UN documents by Yale...or...an internet troll???
Palestine is a loose geographical area without borders, on which no arab state of palistan ever existed in history to claim any borders, and where the british mandate palestine, organized by brits with british administrative borders (which included Jordan), has been kaputski since 1948. of course.
That was hilarious drivel, indeed. Let's do "actual UN documents by Yale" and read the following words in docs headers:
There was no mention of an Israel.
HASHEMITE JORDAN KINGDOM - ISRAEL: GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT
ISRAELI-SYRIAN GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT
EGYPTIAN-ISRAELI GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT
LEBANESE-ISRAELI GENERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT
That's it, Israel was one signing side to these docs, not some "arab state of palistan la-la-land".
There were no "borders for palestine" ever mentioned, neither a "state of palistan" proclaimed, of course. Palistanians is a post-1967 political invention sob-story, before that they referred to themselves as simply arabs, as they, indeed, are.Borders for Palestine were mentioned several times.