Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You missed the point.See what happens when you don't read the posted information?
No, they misrepresented seized evidence and mislead the court.They were protecting national defense information as you would expect the government to do by law.
This is nothing and a desperate attempt by fringe Twitter weirdos to make the low information people think this isn’t legit.
Well if you read the sourced court filing it does.You missed the point.
The posted "information" is actually only someone else's opinion on information.
It does not "say" what you're trying to claim it does.
Typically MAGAt though. Mistake any opinion that confirms your preconceived bias for real news.
They corrected an inconsequential error.No, they misrepresented seized evidence and mislead the court.
Reasonable doubt...................
And mislead the court......They corrected an inconsequential error.
So he's like a High Priest of the MAGAt cult and everything he tweets becomes sacred doctrine for you?Tom Fitton is the guy who has won many lawsuits forcing states to cull their voter rolls of the dead or missing......interestingly, the democrats have fought him every step of the way.
Maybe you should try and educate yourself for once.
Just a minor error. Prosecutions aren’t derailed by inconsequential errors.And mislead the court......
Reasonable doubt.
See what happens when you don't read the posted information?
They altered the contents with other items and lied to the court about it.
Duh..........US admitted it in the court filing.
Too much trouble to find out yourself?So he's like a High Priest of the MAGAt cult and everything he tweets becomes sacred doctrine for you?
Minor error or evidence US was doctoring evidence?Just a minor error. Prosecutions aren’t derailed by inconsequential errors.
Reasonable doubt as to what? Trump already admitted to having these documents. There’s no reasonable doubt as to his possession of them.
And how will that defense portray this?Minor error or evidence US was doctoring evidence?
You can take it to the bank the jury, if it ever gets that far, will hear a lot about it from defense.
Reasonable doubt.
Or the Russia hoax files."Top Secret/SCI" would include launch codes for our nations nuclear missile inventory ... in an unused bathroom in some stupid golf resort ... that's a felony for Citizen Trump ...
My crystal ball is out of calibration.And how will that defense portray this?
Only if you are one of those gullible fools willing to overlook facts in favor of whacky conspiracy theories that favor your cult idol.Reasonable doubt.
They planted the "evidence" all along.No, they misrepresented seized evidence and mislead the court.
Reasonable doubt...................
The facts are in the court filing which the US had to admit they 'misrepresented' key information.Only if you are one of those gullible fools willing to overlook facts in favor of whacky conspiracy theories that favor your cult idol.
Notice they admitted to replacing covers....................and we have this 'viola' epic picture of doc's, in cover sheets, strewn all over the floor.They planted the "evidence" all along.
How about accepting 'the truth' that trump took these documents, LIED about taking them, Wouldn't return them, moved them, LIED again about retuning all of them.Reasonable doubt.
