Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Well yes, that's the point I was trying to make back in post #100.Hi Para,
Why would they hack the RNC? They were working for the Trump administration.
CRC
Russia hackers were operating at the direction of the Russian leadership.Well yes, that's the point I was trying to make back in post #100.
Russian hackers were meddling in 2016, and they were going after both sides. They were just more successful attacking the DNC servers because they were poorly secured.
The physical hardware is not the same as the domain. The domain can be hosted anywhere, mirrored on multiple servers, etc."One in the same"... surely you understand how it sounds.
Or the RNC had better cyber people. There was hacking and release of emails from both parties, which shows that it was not a one-sided thing.I get your point. And it Seems like the russians laid back a bit in the GOP.
Ok.Well yes, that's the point I was trying to make back in post #100.
Russian hackers were meddling in 2016, and they were going after both sides. They were just more successful attacking the DNC servers because they were poorly secured.
You are drawing a conclusion based on the success of the hacks. It was well established that efforts to hack both sides were made.Russia hackers were operating at the direction of the Russian leadership.
Clearly the overall effort was skewed to get Trump in office. And it's not even a secret why. So the both sides ism kind of melts away.
That's alright, she is usually receptive to information and that's more important imo.How can you expect candycorn to know who they were? She's what's known as a "low-information voter."
Poor thing. You just can't get over the fact that Hillary lost, and she won't be coming back.
Trump on the other hand, is the leading candidate in the polls.
You are drawing a conclusion based on the success of the hacks. It was well established that efforts to hack both sides were made.
You can't blame the RNC for the DNC's poor cybersecurity and insecure passwords, or Podesta falling for a phishing attack.
It says nothing about the effort that was put in by the hackers, and everything about the IT people who were in charge.
Old debunked stuff you're recycling. But that's really all the Rabid Right ever had on Hillary. Why would Russia need to make any bribes to the US to buy Canadian ore mines? We were in the process of buying 500 tons worth of highly enriched Uranium from decommissioned Russian warheads at that time.Ah, hotels, how cute. Don't be an idiot. I know that's asking a lot.
Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal (Published 2015)
As the Russian atomic energy agency gradually took charge of a company that controls one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States, a stream of cash made its way to the former president’s charitable organization.www.nytimes.com
The Clintons’ Neoliberal Dystopian Ties to Russia’s Billionaires
Elected officials have developed incestuous relationships with the world’s biggest corporations and wealthiest people.observer.com
The Clinton Foundation, State and Kremlin Connections
“Clinton Cash” author Peter Schweizer writes about Hillary Clinton’s dealings with Russia as secretary of state: Why did Hillary’s State Department urge U.S. investors to fund Russian research for military uses?www.wsj.com
Dumb fuck. Here's why.Liar
Mueller finds no collusion with Russia, leaves obstruction question open
Mueller finds no collusion with Russia, leaves obstruction question open
Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation did not find sufficient evidence that President Donald Trump’s campaign coordinated with Russia to influence the United States’ 2016 election and did not take a clear position on whether Trump obstructed justice.www.americanbar.org
Dumb fuck. Here's why.
From your link. "did not find sufficient evidence" of an illegal conspiracy which is what Mueller was looking for. There is no crime called collusion. He didn't have access to the Russian witnesses and couldn't find sufficient evidence of coordination with just one side of the conspiracy.
No Democrats got over it right away, and then started working at getting Trump VOTED out of office - the legal way.
Republicans are busy gerrymandering, closing polling places in inner city neighbourhoods, and restricting the forms of ID and who can vote, instead of creating platforms and programs the PEOPLE will vote for.
The only poll that matters in the General Election next November, and Trump has NO chance of winning. That's an illusion. Trump is still losing 15% or more of the vote to Nicki Haley, and she dropped out of the race two months ago.
Trump LOST the last election and could ill afford to alienate any of his voters, but he has done NOTHING but lose support since losing in 2020.
The Polls also said that Hillary was way ahead, and look what happened there. The polls are meaningless.
- January 6th cost Trump the most support.
- His refusal to participate in the peaceful transfer of power cost him more
- The criminal indictments
- His attacks on the prosecutors, judges and juries in his trials
- All of the audio evidence of his attempted overthrow of the government
- His antics in the courtroom in the E. Jean Carroll trial and his continued behaviour in defaming her
- Verdicts in the Trump Corporation tax evasion, Fraud, and E. Jean Carroll civil trials.
- Stealing classified documents
- Roe v. Wade
- Promising to prosecute Democrats. He tried and failed to do that for 4 years when he was President.
- His Covid Response
- The WOMEN WILL NEVER VOTE FOR HIM and there are 8 million more women voters than men
The FBI never examined the server, or the destroyed blackberries, etc. Your conclusion is completely baseless.The Russians also made multiple attempts at the Clintons' private server and couldn't get into it either.
Hillary wasn't able to provide anything of tangible value. She just sold Russia access and influence for cash.
www.citizensforethics.org
The fact that you folks are still doing everything you can think of to keep Donald Trump out of the race, should be screaming something very loudly into your ear right now.
But you can't hear that, can you? You can't hear that warning because all you can hear are your fake news media bobbleheads whispering soothing thoughts in your ear, telling you "Everything is alright" and "Trump will never be President."
And when you wake up the morning of Wednesday, November 6, 2024 to the worst nightmare you can imagine, I'll be here for you, and you're not going to like me very much.
No. It did not. Mueller specifically was not interested or looking for collusion, as was looking for crimes that could be prosecuted, as there is NO FEDERAL STATUTE ON COLLUSION.The Mueller investigation found that there was no Russian collusion.
Did you miss that part or something?
No. It did not. Mueller specifically was not interested or looking for collusion, as was looking for crimes that could be prosecuted, as there is NO FEDERAL STATUTE ON COLLUSION.
Normal people know this, but Republicans have been pointing to no collusion charged by Mueller, even though he said in page 1 of the Mueller Report, it was not something he was looking for, while concentrating on actual crimes of people involved in the campaign. He found, referred or charged several successfully.
That pretty well proves what he said. It is not as if he failed to charge anybody with collusion if there is no law on the book regarding collusion. You might as well say he failed to charge anybody with farting loudly in a public library. Sure he didn't charge it, but again, no federal law against it, though it does make a bad smell.Every US citizen Mueller charged were for process crimes and having nothing to do with "Russian collusion." Mueller filed indictment against several Russian nationals and Russian companies, but there was no evidence of any Trump associate "colluding" with Russia to effect the outcome of the election.
All of Robert Mueller’s indictments and plea deals in the Russia investigation
That's a total cop-out. You know damn well it was the democrats and the media, the Clinton campaign, and US officials like Brennan and Clapper who were ALL accusing Trump of "colluding with Russia to influence the 2016 election". Schiff and Swalwell were going on MSNBC and CNN and saying they had seen the evidence. Brennan accused Trump of Treason on national tv. The NYT was publishing pieces on the subject on practically a continuous basis. CNN and MSNBC had nightly shows about it, and how Trump and his kids were about to be indicted, etc ad nauseum.Wise up. Ya'lls collusion crap is just misdirection bullsht.
