CIA "cooked the intelligence" to hide the fact that Putin wanted Hillary Clinton to win 2016 election

That's because the RNC actually had some security on their server. The attempt was made, it was just unsuccessful.

Vs. the DNC server that was in Hillary's bathroom, and Podesta giving his email password out to a phishing email. Plus it was such a great password- "password1". So clever! :lmao:
Russia was working for the Trump administration in the 2016 election. That much is for sure.
 
Russia was working for the Trump administration in the 2016 election. That much is for sure.

LOL, sure...

1714669938639.png
 
No, they were just trying to sow discord. They were doing the same disinfo crap against both sides.
Ummm no. No RNC e-mails hacked by the soviets were released through Wikileaks. No DNC officials were arrested for lying about their connections to soviet intel.

Hardly the same at all.
 
That's because the RNC actually had some security on their server. The attempt was made, it was just unsuccessful.

Vs. the DNC server that was in Hillary's bathroom, and Podesta giving his email password out to a phishing email. Plus it was such a great password- "password1". So clever! :lmao:
The main hack was the DNC server. Not Hillary's or podesta's.

And they successfully hacked the RNC servers. The Russians just didn't feel like releasing that hacked info.

Contrary to the idiotic, lying thread title... we all know exactly why they did not.
 
The main hack was the DNC server. Not Hillary's or podesta's.
They were one and the same. The Clinton campaign took over the DNC and her IT people were running both.
And they successfully hacked the RNC servers. The Russians just didn't feel like releasing that hacked info.
No they didn't. They got into some inactive accounts, and there were some State party GOP officials' emails that were published on DCLeaks, but the RNC server was never breached.

"On January 10th, FBI Director James Comey testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee that while the Russians had successfully targeted individual Republican lawmakers and Republican state organizations, they had launched a successful attack only against non-longer active RNC accounts."

 
Hi Para:

So no Russian hackers.

Thanks,

Candy R. Corn
Member, Ruling Elite since 1977.
No, I said the attempt was made to hack the RNC server but it was not successful.

No evidence was ever shown the the RNC server was breached, other than some defunct accounts and state-level officials.

From my prev link:

"ThreatConnect’s senior threat intelligence researcher, Kyle Ehmke, said, “We cannot speak to Priebus’ claims nor have we been contacted by the RNC or Airnet with respect to this issue, so we do not have any internal knowledge of the issue. However, the inclusion of dozens of Republican party-related emails on the FANCY BEAR faketivist site DCLeaks suggest that the Republican party was also targeted by FANCY BEAR operations. The emails that are in the Republican-related post on DCLeaks fall in the 6/9/2015 to 10/26/2015 timeframe and were posted on 6/4/2016 to DCLeaks.”

There is another “common thread” besides the timing, according to reporting by the website The Smoking Gun. In August, TSG reported that “the victimized [GOP] campaigns, state parties, PACs, and businesses all contracted with the same Tennessee web hosting outfit. The firm, Smartech, and its parent, AirNet Group, are major providers of data services, call centers, and web hosting for scores of Republican clients.
 
They were one and the same. The Clinton campaign took over the DNC and her IT people were running both.
The DNC server was not the same sever as hilary's personal server. That's all.


No they didn't. They got into some inactive accounts, and there were some State party GOP officials' emails that were published on DCLeaks, but the RNC server was never breached.
The email accounts and the emails were in fact breached. The accounts were no longer active And the Russians decided not to release its the data they stole on republicans. We all know exactly why.

"Comey later added that "there was evidence of hacking directed at state-level organizations, state-level campaigns, and the RNC, but old domains of the RNC, meaning old emails they weren't using. None of that was released." - CNN
 
No, I said the attempt was made to hack the RNC server but it was not successful.

No evidence was ever shown the the RNC server was breached, other than some defunct accounts and state-level officials.

From my prev link:

"ThreatConnect’s senior threat intelligence researcher, Kyle Ehmke, said, “We cannot speak to Priebus’ claims nor have we been contacted by the RNC or Airnet with respect to this issue, so we do not have any internal knowledge of the issue. However, the inclusion of dozens of Republican party-related emails on the FANCY BEAR faketivist site DCLeaks suggest that the Republican party was also targeted by FANCY BEAR operations. The emails that are in the Republican-related post on DCLeaks fall in the 6/9/2015 to 10/26/2015 timeframe and were posted on 6/4/2016 to DCLeaks.”

There is another “common thread” besides the timing, according to reporting by the website The Smoking Gun. In August, TSG reported that “the victimized [GOP] campaigns, state parties, PACs, and businesses all contracted with the same Tennessee web hosting outfit. The firm, Smartech, and its parent, AirNet Group, are major providers of data services, call centers, and web hosting for scores of Republican clients.
Hi Para,

Why would they hack the RNC? They were working for the Trump administration.

CRC
 
The DNC server was not the same sever as hilary's personal server. That's all.
Irrelevant and I was being facetious. By then her physical server had already been removed and sent to Crowdstrike in Ukraine.

The DNC's data operations were merged with the Clinton campaign and run by her IT people, who were a bunch of amateurs.
 

Forum List

Back
Top