Nonprofit Seeks “Default Judgment” After Fani Willis Withholds Public Records Related to Jack Smith and the J6 Committee

[excalibur]

Fani keeps setting her hair on fire.

But no surprise that she believes she is above the law. Just utter irresponsibility.

​

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis failed to answer a public records lawsuit from activist foundation Judicial Watch, triggering the organization to file a motion seeking a ruling in its favor by default.​

​

The motion was filed after Ms. Willis did not respond to a lawsuit seeking certain records. The documents were related to special counsel Jack Smith and the Jan. 6 committee.​

​

Judicial Watch asked for a “default judgment” in the motion.​

​

“I think this is the first time in Judicial Watch’s 30 years that a government official failed to answer an open records lawsuit in court,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.​

​

“This further shows Ms. Willis has something to hide about her collusion with the Biden administration and Nancy Pelosi’s Congress on her unprecedented and compromised ‘get-Trump’ prosecution.”​

​

Ms. Willis’s case charges President Trump and over a dozen co-defendants with allegedly attempting illegally to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential race in Fulton County.​

​

On March 5, Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit against Ms. Willis and Fulton County, Georgia, seeking to make the defendants comply with the Georgia Open Records Act. The lawsuit was filed after Judicial Watch had requested the county back on Aug. 22, 2023, to provide certain documents. The county acknowledged receipt of the request the same day.​

​

The request sought all documents and communications (a) related to Special Counsel Jack Smith or any employees in his office and (b) sent or received from the House Jan. 6 committee or any of its employees.​

​

On Aug. 23, Judicial Watch received an email from the county confirming that the District Attorney “is in receipt of your open records request.” Later on the same day, the county sent a second email stating, “After carefully reviewing, your request[,] [w]e do not have the responsive records.”​

​

“Plaintiff has since learned that the County’s representation about not having records responsive to the request is likely false,” Judicial Watch said in the lawsuit.​

​

The organization pointed out that on Dec. 17, 2021, Ms. Willis sent a letter to Jan. 6 committee chairman Bennie G. Thompson (D-Miss.), requesting access to “relevant records” crucial to her investigation into illegal attempts to interfere in the 2020 election in Georgia.​

​

“Those records include but are not limited to recordings and transcripts of witness interviews and depositions, electronic and print records of communications, and records of travel,” the Dec. 17 letter stated.​

​

...​

Nonprofit Seeks "Default Judgment" After Fani Willis Withholds Public Records Related to Jack Smith and the J6 Committee - 🔔 The Liberty Daily

If you love the news, check out The Liberty Daily's homepage. (The Epoch Times)—Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis failed to answer a public records lawsuit from activist foundation Judicial Watch, triggering the organization to file a motion seeking a ruling in its favor by default...

thelibertydaily.com

 

[The Duke]

It's all smoke and mirrors. I think they all should be criminally prosecuted for using the justice system for political purposes.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

You people and that woman. Geesh!

 

[candycorn]

Fani keeps setting her hair on fire.

But no surprise that she believes she is above the law. Just utter irresponsibility.

​

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis failed to answer a public records lawsuit from activist foundation Judicial Watch, triggering the organization to file a motion seeking a ruling in its favor by default.​

​

The motion was filed after Ms. Willis did not respond to a lawsuit seeking certain records. The documents were related to special counsel Jack Smith and the Jan. 6 committee.​

​

Judicial Watch asked for a “default judgment” in the motion.​

​

“I think this is the first time in Judicial Watch’s 30 years that a government official failed to answer an open records lawsuit in court,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.​

​

“This further shows Ms. Willis has something to hide about her collusion with the Biden administration and Nancy Pelosi’s Congress on her unprecedented and compromised ‘get-Trump’ prosecution.”​

​

Ms. Willis’s case charges President Trump and over a dozen co-defendants with allegedly attempting illegally to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential race in Fulton County.​

​

On March 5, Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit against Ms. Willis and Fulton County, Georgia, seeking to make the defendants comply with the Georgia Open Records Act. The lawsuit was filed after Judicial Watch had requested the county back on Aug. 22, 2023, to provide certain documents. The county acknowledged receipt of the request the same day.​

​

The request sought all documents and communications (a) related to Special Counsel Jack Smith or any employees in his office and (b) sent or received from the House Jan. 6 committee or any of its employees.​

​

On Aug. 23, Judicial Watch received an email from the county confirming that the District Attorney “is in receipt of your open records request.” Later on the same day, the county sent a second email stating, “After carefully reviewing, your request[,] [w]e do not have the responsive records.”​

​

“Plaintiff has since learned that the County’s representation about not having records responsive to the request is likely false,” Judicial Watch said in the lawsuit.​

​

The organization pointed out that on Dec. 17, 2021, Ms. Willis sent a letter to Jan. 6 committee chairman Bennie G. Thompson (D-Miss.), requesting access to “relevant records” crucial to her investigation into illegal attempts to interfere in the 2020 election in Georgia.​

​

“Those records include but are not limited to recordings and transcripts of witness interviews and depositions, electronic and print records of communications, and records of travel,” the Dec. 17 letter stated.​

​

...​

Nonprofit Seeks "Default Judgment" After Fani Willis Withholds Public Records Related to Jack Smith and the J6 Committee - 🔔 The Liberty Daily

If you love the news, check out The Liberty Daily's homepage. (The Epoch Times)—Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis failed to answer a public records lawsuit from activist foundation Judicial Watch, triggering the organization to file a motion seeking a ruling in its favor by default...

thelibertydaily.com

Well, keep us posted on the outcome.

 

[The Duke]

Well, keep us posted on the outcome.

I say Fani's case is going nowhere and she will be made to step down, if not criminally prosecuted/fined.

 

[candycorn]

I say Fani's case is going nowhere and she will be made to step down, if not criminally prosecuted/fined.

It should be interesting to watch since J6 has nothing to do with his trying to pull election fraud in Georgia. but that is what the OP has tied together in his latest lobotomy-fueled rant.

 

[1srelluc]

And some people wonder why stereotypes exist when it comes to blacks in official positions.....They really do think that the laws do not apply to them due to their skin color.

 

[Vrenn]

Fani keeps setting her hair on fire.

But no surprise that she believes she is above the law. Just utter irresponsibility.

​

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis failed to answer a public records lawsuit from activist foundation Judicial Watch, triggering the organization to file a motion seeking a ruling in its favor by default.​

​

The motion was filed after Ms. Willis did not respond to a lawsuit seeking certain records. The documents were related to special counsel Jack Smith and the Jan. 6 committee.​

​

Judicial Watch asked for a “default judgment” in the motion.​

​

“I think this is the first time in Judicial Watch’s 30 years that a government official failed to answer an open records lawsuit in court,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.​

​

“This further shows Ms. Willis has something to hide about her collusion with the Biden administration and Nancy Pelosi’s Congress on her unprecedented and compromised ‘get-Trump’ prosecution.”​

​

Ms. Willis’s case charges President Trump and over a dozen co-defendants with allegedly attempting illegally to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential race in Fulton County.​

​

On March 5, Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit against Ms. Willis and Fulton County, Georgia, seeking to make the defendants comply with the Georgia Open Records Act. The lawsuit was filed after Judicial Watch had requested the county back on Aug. 22, 2023, to provide certain documents. The county acknowledged receipt of the request the same day.​

​

The request sought all documents and communications (a) related to Special Counsel Jack Smith or any employees in his office and (b) sent or received from the House Jan. 6 committee or any of its employees.​

​

On Aug. 23, Judicial Watch received an email from the county confirming that the District Attorney “is in receipt of your open records request.” Later on the same day, the county sent a second email stating, “After carefully reviewing, your request[,] [w]e do not have the responsive records.”​

​

“Plaintiff has since learned that the County’s representation about not having records responsive to the request is likely false,” Judicial Watch said in the lawsuit.​

​

The organization pointed out that on Dec. 17, 2021, Ms. Willis sent a letter to Jan. 6 committee chairman Bennie G. Thompson (D-Miss.), requesting access to “relevant records” crucial to her investigation into illegal attempts to interfere in the 2020 election in Georgia.​

​

“Those records include but are not limited to recordings and transcripts of witness interviews and depositions, electronic and print records of communications, and records of travel,” the Dec. 17 letter stated.​

​

...​

Nonprofit Seeks "Default Judgment" After Fani Willis Withholds Public Records Related to Jack Smith and the J6 Committee - 🔔 The Liberty Daily

If you love the news, check out The Liberty Daily's homepage. (The Epoch Times)—Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis failed to answer a public records lawsuit from activist foundation Judicial Watch, triggering the organization to file a motion seeking a ruling in its favor by default...

thelibertydaily.com

Judicial Watch is a sad cite for anything other than, "What have we recently made up".

Judicial Watch – Bias and Credibility​

​

Detailed Report​

Reasoning: Conspiracy, Propaganda, Numerous Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

And you have about the same credibility, Comrade Ivan.

 

[1srelluc]

Judicial Watch is a sad cite for anything other than, "What have we recently made up".

Judicial Watch – Bias and Credibility​

​

Detailed Report​

Reasoning: Conspiracy, Propaganda, Numerous Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

And you have about the same credibility, Comrade Ivan.

MBFC has been a leftist shill site for years.

As far as Judicial Watch goes it where congress turns to get at what congress can't get at by subpoena. JW can root 'em out.

 

[Vrenn]

MBFC has been a leftist shill site for years.

As far as Judicial Watch goes it where congress turns to get at what congress can't get at by subpoena. JW can root 'em out.

And it's reprinting a news item from Johnson who is fighting for his life. I prevented what it claimed just by putting something in the root celler.

 

[Rawley]

Judicial Watch is a sad cite for anything other than, "What have we recently made up".

Judicial Watch – Bias and Credibility​

​

Detailed Report​

Reasoning: Conspiracy, Propaganda, Numerous Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

And you have about the same credibility, Comrade Ivan.

?? Judicial Watch is not a media company.

 

[1srelluc]

And it's reprinting a news item from Johnson who is fighting for his life. I prevented what it claimed just by putting something in the root celler.

Well at least you are not disputing that MBFC has been a leftist shill site for years.....Thought I would not notice didn't ya?

 

[excalibur]

When they've got nothing, they bring out a chart from some far left site claiming bias.

From the OP:

“I think this is the first time in Judicial Watch’s 30 years that a government official failed to answer an open records lawsuit in court,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.
​

 

[Crepitus]

Fani keeps setting her hair on fire.

But no surprise that she believes she is above the law. Just utter irresponsibility.

​

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis failed to answer a public records lawsuit from activist foundation Judicial Watch, triggering the organization to file a motion seeking a ruling in its favor by default.​

​

The motion was filed after Ms. Willis did not respond to a lawsuit seeking certain records. The documents were related to special counsel Jack Smith and the Jan. 6 committee.​

​

Judicial Watch asked for a “default judgment” in the motion.​

​

“I think this is the first time in Judicial Watch’s 30 years that a government official failed to answer an open records lawsuit in court,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.​

​

“This further shows Ms. Willis has something to hide about her collusion with the Biden administration and Nancy Pelosi’s Congress on her unprecedented and compromised ‘get-Trump’ prosecution.”​

​

Ms. Willis’s case charges President Trump and over a dozen co-defendants with allegedly attempting illegally to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential race in Fulton County.​

​

On March 5, Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit against Ms. Willis and Fulton County, Georgia, seeking to make the defendants comply with the Georgia Open Records Act. The lawsuit was filed after Judicial Watch had requested the county back on Aug. 22, 2023, to provide certain documents. The county acknowledged receipt of the request the same day.​

​

The request sought all documents and communications (a) related to Special Counsel Jack Smith or any employees in his office and (b) sent or received from the House Jan. 6 committee or any of its employees.​

​

On Aug. 23, Judicial Watch received an email from the county confirming that the District Attorney “is in receipt of your open records request.” Later on the same day, the county sent a second email stating, “After carefully reviewing, your request[,] [w]e do not have the responsive records.”​

​

“Plaintiff has since learned that the County’s representation about not having records responsive to the request is likely false,” Judicial Watch said in the lawsuit.​

​

The organization pointed out that on Dec. 17, 2021, Ms. Willis sent a letter to Jan. 6 committee chairman Bennie G. Thompson (D-Miss.), requesting access to “relevant records” crucial to her investigation into illegal attempts to interfere in the 2020 election in Georgia.​

​

“Those records include but are not limited to recordings and transcripts of witness interviews and depositions, electronic and print records of communications, and records of travel,” the Dec. 17 letter stated.​

​

...​

Nonprofit Seeks "Default Judgment" After Fani Willis Withholds Public Records Related to Jack Smith and the J6 Committee - 🔔 The Liberty Daily

If you love the news, check out The Liberty Daily's homepage. (The Epoch Times)—Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis failed to answer a public records lawsuit from activist foundation Judicial Watch, triggering the organization to file a motion seeking a ruling in its favor by default...

thelibertydaily.com

Dude, nobody will ever turn over evidence in a trial that isn't completed.

The people who filed this suit know that.

It's just to keep idiots like you riled up.

And apparently it's working perfectly.

Rile away, kiddo/.

 

[Crepitus]

MBFC has been a leftist shill site for years.

As far as Judicial Watch goes it where congress turns to get at what congress can't get at by subpoena. JW can root 'em out.

never heard of MBFC, and judicial watch is a joke.

 

[Crepitus]

?? Judicial Watch is not a media company.

Lol, what are they then?

 

[Rawley]

Lol, what are they then?

WHat's LOL? They are a gvt watchdog group. The file Freedom of Information requests and lawsuits to keep gvt honest.

Here in CA. they forced the gvt to purge over 5M bogus registrations from the voter rolls, which had not been policed in over 10 years.

 

[Independent thinker]

Fani keeps setting her hair on fire.

But no surprise that she believes she is above the law. Just utter irresponsibility.

​

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis failed to answer a public records lawsuit from activist foundation Judicial Watch, triggering the organization to file a motion seeking a ruling in its favor by default.​

​

The motion was filed after Ms. Willis did not respond to a lawsuit seeking certain records. The documents were related to special counsel Jack Smith and the Jan. 6 committee.​

​

Judicial Watch asked for a “default judgment” in the motion.​

​

“I think this is the first time in Judicial Watch’s 30 years that a government official failed to answer an open records lawsuit in court,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.​

​

“This further shows Ms. Willis has something to hide about her collusion with the Biden administration and Nancy Pelosi’s Congress on her unprecedented and compromised ‘get-Trump’ prosecution.”​

​

Ms. Willis’s case charges President Trump and over a dozen co-defendants with allegedly attempting illegally to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential race in Fulton County.​

​

On March 5, Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit against Ms. Willis and Fulton County, Georgia, seeking to make the defendants comply with the Georgia Open Records Act. The lawsuit was filed after Judicial Watch had requested the county back on Aug. 22, 2023, to provide certain documents. The county acknowledged receipt of the request the same day.​

​

The request sought all documents and communications (a) related to Special Counsel Jack Smith or any employees in his office and (b) sent or received from the House Jan. 6 committee or any of its employees.​

​

On Aug. 23, Judicial Watch received an email from the county confirming that the District Attorney “is in receipt of your open records request.” Later on the same day, the county sent a second email stating, “After carefully reviewing, your request[,] [w]e do not have the responsive records.”​

​

“Plaintiff has since learned that the County’s representation about not having records responsive to the request is likely false,” Judicial Watch said in the lawsuit.​

​

The organization pointed out that on Dec. 17, 2021, Ms. Willis sent a letter to Jan. 6 committee chairman Bennie G. Thompson (D-Miss.), requesting access to “relevant records” crucial to her investigation into illegal attempts to interfere in the 2020 election in Georgia.​

​

“Those records include but are not limited to recordings and transcripts of witness interviews and depositions, electronic and print records of communications, and records of travel,” the Dec. 17 letter stated.​

​

...​

Nonprofit Seeks "Default Judgment" After Fani Willis Withholds Public Records Related to Jack Smith and the J6 Committee - 🔔 The Liberty Daily

If you love the news, check out The Liberty Daily's homepage. (The Epoch Times)—Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis failed to answer a public records lawsuit from activist foundation Judicial Watch, triggering the organization to file a motion seeking a ruling in its favor by default...

thelibertydaily.com

I wonder how she got where she is. She seems quite stupid to me. Maybe she slept her way up the ladder.

 

[bendog]

And some people wonder why stereotypes exist when it comes to blacks in official positions.....They really do think that the laws do not apply to them due to their skin color.

yah it's not like gopers fuck each other at the drop of a hat.

 

[Crepitus]

WHat's LOL? They are a gvt watchdog group. The file Freedom of Information requests and lawsuits to keep gvt honest.

Here in CA. they forced the gvt to purge over 5M bogus registrations from the voter rolls, which had not been policed in over 10 years.

Lmao!

Nothing about them is honest in any way shape or form.

They are a conservative media company.