You are a liberal, therefor you aren't too bright so let me try to help you:
I stated that it was a publicity stunt, no where did I state that the privately owned company shouldn't be allowed to do it. Understand?
I understood perfectly. We were discussing Enforcement and I suggested that they hoped you would act like an adult, which you won't, but you want others to respect the rights of Anti-Gay Marriage people and go elsewhere. Now all of a sudden you and your gun are supposed to be welcome everywhere? Why not just go elsewhere eh?
Wtf are you talking about? Do you even know? You are so far out in left field I don't even know how to guide you back to the real world.
I think, in your screwed up head, you are trying to imply that I'm inconsistent on the issue of the rights of privately owned companies. As I already tried to tell you, I am not, nor am I suggesting that any company can't do what it wants to. Gays can and should be able to patronize any store they want to and the owners should be able to refuse to serve them if they so choose. Target, or any company should have the right to refuse to allow people to carry guns in their stores if they want to as well.
Now, pay attention to this part:
It's a publicity stunt and they know it because they really can't enforce it. Do you understand now? If not, I can't help you further.