Yes, they actually ARE coming for your guns....

[Billy000]

House Democrats Introduce Bill to Ban Manufacture of ‘Assault Weapons’
LINK: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/12/15/house-democrats-introduce-bill-ban-manufacture-assault-weapons/


Yep, they ARE coming for your guns…they just intend to stop them at the source:

"On 16 December, D-Rep David Cicilline (D-RI-1st) will introduce the “Assault Weapons Ban of 2015″ to ban all manufacturing of “assault weapons.”

Besides banning the manufacturing of AR-15s and related firearms, the ban would put in place “new restrictions on the sale of already existing assault weapons.”

According to The Hill, Cicilline said, “Assault weapons are designed for the sole purpose of killing as many people as quickly as possible. We need to do everything we can to reduce the toll of gun violence by keeping these weapons out of our communities.”His bill has “90 Democrat co-sponsors including House Minority WHIP D-Md Steny Hoyer."

I AM actually for any anti-gun legislation that bans Obama and his administration from ever handling, selling, or handing our guns / weapons to Mexican Drug Cartels, Al Qaeida, Muslim Brotherhood, ISIS, or anyone else. Based on their documented history they can not be trusted with weapons...and they probably could not pass their own vetting process after handing out weapons to all those groups (especially considering all the innocent people killed and crimes / terrorist acts perpetrated with those weapons).

I would hardly consider this gun grabbing. It's not like any current owners of assault weapons will lose their private property.

And if you actually think this bill will get anywhere then you are the typical paranoid gun nutter.

 

[peach174]

You 3 must be outside yo damn paranoid minds

Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to getcha.

Why do you think eliminating private sales is Obama's answer to every mass shooting...even though the shooters have all bought guns through FFLs and passed background checks?

How is the answer to people passing background checks and committing crimes to force other people to pass the same background check the shooters just passed?


Doesn't make any sense does it?

Unless the goal is defacto registration.

Cause you can't confiscate if you can't compile a registration.

Maybe this isn't the case...maybe it is paranoia...but when people you can't trust persue solutions that do not solve the problem that they claim to be their goal...but just happen to further their anti-gun ambitions...forgive me if I'm suspicious of their underlying motivations.

Thanks for proving you're insane.

The goals you speak of will never be met.

Until a bill containing any of that crap leaves the house approved...quit whining

Why even waste time and money on an such a foolish, meaningless bill??

Why do Chihuahuas growl at Bulldogs?

Because Chihuahuas think they weigh 300 pounds.

 

[toxicmedia]

You 3 must be outside yo damn paranoid minds

Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to getcha.

Why do you think eliminating private sales is Obama's answer to every mass shooting...even though the shooters have all bought guns through FFLs and passed background checks?

How is the answer to people passing background checks and committing crimes to force other people to pass the same background check the shooters just passed?

Doesn't make any sense does it?

Unless the goal is defacto registration.

Cause you can't confiscate if you can't compile a registration.

Maybe this isn't the case...maybe it is paranoia...but when people you can't trust persue solutions that do not solve the problem that they claim to be their goal...but just happen to further their anti-gun ambitions...forgive me if I'm suspicious of their underlying motivations.

Thanks for proving you're insane.

The goals you speak of will never be met.

Until a bill containing any of that crap leaves the house approved...quit whining

Why even waste time and money on an such a foolish, meaningless bill??

To make a statement that they think will get a rise out of their constituents. The Obamacare repeal attempts were just that

 

[toxicmedia]

You 3 must be outside yo damn paranoid minds

Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to getcha.

Why do you think eliminating private sales is Obama's answer to every mass shooting...even though the shooters have all bought guns through FFLs and passed background checks?

How is the answer to people passing background checks and committing crimes to force other people to pass the same background check the shooters just passed?

Doesn't make any sense does it?

Unless the goal is defacto registration.

Cause you can't confiscate if you can't compile a registration.

Maybe this isn't the case...maybe it is paranoia...but when people you can't trust persue solutions that do not solve the problem that they claim to be their goal...but just happen to further their anti-gun ambitions...forgive me if I'm suspicious of their underlying motivations.

Thanks for proving you're insane.

The goals you speak of will never be met.

Until a bill containing any of that crap leaves the house approved...quit whining

Okay...let me get this straight...you only oppose legislation after it passes.

A test then. You haven't said a word about Trump's temporary ban on Muslim immigrants.

I mean...it hadn't passed...he's not even part of the government. So you kept completely mum...

Right?

There are few things I hate more than sentences that start with "Okay...let me get this straight...." Because I have yet to see one that has what I said straight.

Nobody is coming for your guns.

 

[Rustic]

You 3 must be outside yo damn paranoid minds

Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to getcha.

Why do you think eliminating private sales is Obama's answer to every mass shooting...even though the shooters have all bought guns through FFLs and passed background checks?

How is the answer to people passing background checks and committing crimes to force other people to pass the same background check the shooters just passed?

Doesn't make any sense does it?

Unless the goal is defacto registration.

Cause you can't confiscate if you can't compile a registration.

Maybe this isn't the case...maybe it is paranoia...but when people you can't trust persue solutions that do not solve the problem that they claim to be their goal...but just happen to further their anti-gun ambitions...forgive me if I'm suspicious of their underlying motivations.

Thanks for proving you're insane.

The goals you speak of will never be met.

Until a bill containing any of that crap leaves the house approved...quit whining

Okay...let me get this straight...you only oppose legislation after it passes.

A test then. You haven't said a word about Trump's temporary ban on Muslim immigrants.

I mean...it hadn't passed...he's not even part of the government. So you kept completely mum...

Right?

There are few things I hate more than sentences that start with "Okay...let me get this straight...." Because I have yet to see one that has what I said straight.

Nobody is coming for your guns.

Still absolutely no reason for anymore laws...

 

[American_Jihad]

Yes, They Are Coming for Your Guns
It’s not paranoia if they’re really gunning for you.
January 25, 2016
Mark Tapson

Progressives love to ridicule Americans who are concerned that their Second Amendment rights are being threatened by a gun control-obsessed Obama administration. “No one is coming for your precious guns,” the hoplophobes taunt. “We just want commonsense gun laws.” Except that the pursuit of “commonsense gun laws,” which already exist, is just a smokescreen – President Obama and his crew really are coming for your precious guns.

Obama has made it no secret that he intends to push hard for stricter gun control in his final stretch in office. He emphasized that determination by appearing to be overcome with emotion when discussing the Sandy Hook shooting in a speech on gun control on January 4. That tearful moment – staged or not – spoke powerfully to his fan base, because leftists are all about feelings rather than facts; they feel for the children lost to gun violence, and if you object to “commonsense gun laws” then you are obviously a heartless right-winger who doesn’t care if children die. Never mind that the measures they want to implement not only would not have prevented most mass shootings, but – like the impotency of “gun-free zones” – they are more likely to prevent law-abiding gun owners from defending themselves and their loved ones from mass shooters.

Just prior to that speech, Obama issued executive actions expanding background checks on people buying firearms online or at gun shows. “This is a dangerous level of executive overreach, and the country will not stand for it,” Speaker Paul Ryan responded. “The president is at minimum subverting the legislative branch, and potentially overturning its will.”

Also at the beginning of the year, the Obama administration finalized a rule allowing health care providers to report the names of mentally ill patients to an FBI firearms background check system. Now watch the definition of “mentally ill” begin to expand to include any belief or behavior that the left would like to stamp out – fervent adherence to the Constitution, homeschooling, and climate change “denial,” for example – enabling the government to categorize those gun owners as mentally ill and disarm them.

That’s not all. The Washington Examiner announced that Obama plans to build a new gun control force of 430 agents, more than eight times the size of the team of commandos he is sending to the Middle East to take on ISIS.

And yet in a televised townhall meeting a few days later, Obama treated concerns about gun control overreach as paranoia. CNN moderator Anderson Cooper asked the President about worries that his administration wants to seize all firearms as a precursor to imposing martial law. He blamed that notion on the National Rifle Association (NRA) and others who worry that “somebody's going to come grab your guns.”

Obama dismissed that concern as crazy talk. “Yes, that is a conspiracy,” he said, then added unconvincingly: “I'm only going to be here for another year. When would I have started on this enterprise?”

Actually, the legal groundwork for that enterprise has long been underway, and it is picking up momentum, especially in California, which is always on the cutting edge of progressive lunacy. Already this month, three separate gun control bills attempting to categorize just about every firearm as an “assault weapon” have been introduced in California, which already has the strictest gun laws in the country and nothing to show for it except increasingly fed-up, law-abiding gun owners.

Senate Bill 880, authored by Democrat Senators Isadore Hall III and Steve Glazer, would change the definition of “assault weapon” to include any semi-automatic, centerfire rifle, or even semi-automatic handgun that does not have a “fixed magazine” but has any one of a list of “evil features.” The bill defines “fixed magazine” as one that “cannot be removed without disassembly of the firearm action.” This would include potentially millions of firearms, including handguns, that would then need to be registered as “assault weapons” with the Department of Justice.

“Senate Bill 880 is another bill representative of the gun control frenzy we’re seeing from big-city Democrats these days,” says Brandon Combs, president of the Firearms Policy Coalition. “Legislators like Hall and Glazer absolutely want to take your guns one bill at a time.”

That goes for California’s fifteen-year-old Unsafe Handgun Act, which includes a roster of handguns that meet the state’s increasingly stringent safety requirements; that roster is getting gradually smaller. The Calguns Foundation estimates that “at the current rate the number of approved handguns will dwindle to practically zero within the next six years… leaving a state of some 38 million unable to purchase new semi-automatic handguns.”

As Eugene Volokh puts it at The Washington Post, calls for bans on the sale or home possession of semiautomatic weapons in general are increasing. “These aren’t calls for restricting supposedly narrow categories of guns that are allegedly used predominantly by criminals,” he writes. “These are calls for banning the sorts of guns that tens of millions of law-abiding Americans have in their homes.”

California Attorney General and anti-gun extremist Kamala Harris recently announced that over the last two years her Department had “doubled the average number of guns seized annually.” She is now backing a separate bill that would require all rifles sold in the state to have permanently fixed magazines. “The devastation wrought by gun violence on innocent victims, children and families in this country, is an international embarrassment,” Harris said in a statement.

...

Hillary, who travels with a phalanx of armed guards, can mock all she likes, but if she, Obama, and the radical left continue pushing this issue, they will discover that, like Brooke Shields and her Calvin Klein jeans, Americans won’t let anything come between them and their guns. If it comes to a showdown over gun confiscation, American gun owners will have a firm answer for the government: Molon labe.

Yes, They Are Coming for Your Guns

 

[PredFan]

Yes, They Are Coming for Your Guns
It’s not paranoia if they’re really gunning for you.
January 25, 2016
Mark Tapson

Progressives love to ridicule Americans who are concerned that their Second Amendment rights are being threatened by a gun control-obsessed Obama administration. “No one is coming for your precious guns,” the hoplophobes taunt. “We just want commonsense gun laws.” Except that the pursuit of “commonsense gun laws,” which already exist, is just a smokescreen – President Obama and his crew really are coming for your precious guns.

Obama has made it no secret that he intends to push hard for stricter gun control in his final stretch in office. He emphasized that determination by appearing to be overcome with emotion when discussing the Sandy Hook shooting in a speech on gun control on January 4. That tearful moment – staged or not – spoke powerfully to his fan base, because leftists are all about feelings rather than facts; they feel for the children lost to gun violence, and if you object to “commonsense gun laws” then you are obviously a heartless right-winger who doesn’t care if children die. Never mind that the measures they want to implement not only would not have prevented most mass shootings, but – like the impotency of “gun-free zones” – they are more likely to prevent law-abiding gun owners from defending themselves and their loved ones from mass shooters.

Just prior to that speech, Obama issued executive actions expanding background checks on people buying firearms online or at gun shows. “This is a dangerous level of executive overreach, and the country will not stand for it,” Speaker Paul Ryan responded. “The president is at minimum subverting the legislative branch, and potentially overturning its will.”

Also at the beginning of the year, the Obama administration finalized a rule allowing health care providers to report the names of mentally ill patients to an FBI firearms background check system. Now watch the definition of “mentally ill” begin to expand to include any belief or behavior that the left would like to stamp out – fervent adherence to the Constitution, homeschooling, and climate change “denial,” for example – enabling the government to categorize those gun owners as mentally ill and disarm them.

That’s not all. The Washington Examiner announced that Obama plans to build a new gun control force of 430 agents, more than eight times the size of the team of commandos he is sending to the Middle East to take on ISIS.

And yet in a televised townhall meeting a few days later, Obama treated concerns about gun control overreach as paranoia. CNN moderator Anderson Cooper asked the President about worries that his administration wants to seize all firearms as a precursor to imposing martial law. He blamed that notion on the National Rifle Association (NRA) and others who worry that “somebody's going to come grab your guns.”

Obama dismissed that concern as crazy talk. “Yes, that is a conspiracy,” he said, then added unconvincingly: “I'm only going to be here for another year. When would I have started on this enterprise?”

Actually, the legal groundwork for that enterprise has long been underway, and it is picking up momentum, especially in California, which is always on the cutting edge of progressive lunacy. Already this month, three separate gun control bills attempting to categorize just about every firearm as an “assault weapon” have been introduced in California, which already has the strictest gun laws in the country and nothing to show for it except increasingly fed-up, law-abiding gun owners.

Senate Bill 880, authored by Democrat Senators Isadore Hall III and Steve Glazer, would change the definition of “assault weapon” to include any semi-automatic, centerfire rifle, or even semi-automatic handgun that does not have a “fixed magazine” but has any one of a list of “evil features.” The bill defines “fixed magazine” as one that “cannot be removed without disassembly of the firearm action.” This would include potentially millions of firearms, including handguns, that would then need to be registered as “assault weapons” with the Department of Justice.

“Senate Bill 880 is another bill representative of the gun control frenzy we’re seeing from big-city Democrats these days,” says Brandon Combs, president of the Firearms Policy Coalition. “Legislators like Hall and Glazer absolutely want to take your guns one bill at a time.”

That goes for California’s fifteen-year-old Unsafe Handgun Act, which includes a roster of handguns that meet the state’s increasingly stringent safety requirements; that roster is getting gradually smaller. The Calguns Foundation estimates that “at the current rate the number of approved handguns will dwindle to practically zero within the next six years… leaving a state of some 38 million unable to purchase new semi-automatic handguns.”

As Eugene Volokh puts it at The Washington Post, calls for bans on the sale or home possession of semiautomatic weapons in general are increasing. “These aren’t calls for restricting supposedly narrow categories of guns that are allegedly used predominantly by criminals,” he writes. “These are calls for banning the sorts of guns that tens of millions of law-abiding Americans have in their homes.”

California Attorney General and anti-gun extremist Kamala Harris recently announced that over the last two years her Department had “doubled the average number of guns seized annually.” She is now backing a separate bill that would require all rifles sold in the state to have permanently fixed magazines. “The devastation wrought by gun violence on innocent victims, children and families in this country, is an international embarrassment,” Harris said in a statement.

...

Hillary, who travels with a phalanx of armed guards, can mock all she likes, but if she, Obama, and the radical left continue pushing this issue, they will discover that, like Brooke Shields and her Calvin Klein jeans, Americans won’t let anything come between them and their guns. If it comes to a showdown over gun confiscation, American gun owners will have a firm answer for the government: Molon labe.

Yes, They Are Coming for Your Guns

Only a fool believes otherwise. Thanks for posting that.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Sigh.