Yes - it's true. The GOP can easily force same-day in-person voting on all elections.

[StatesRightsForever]

Article 1 section 4 gives congress authority to alter how elections are conducted. If the GOP cancels the senate filibuster, they can force honest elections on america meaning same-day in-person voting (except for soldiers overseas) with paper ballots and photo id and all counting done by humans with cams filming every ballot.

The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and
Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof;
but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except
as to the Place of Chusing Senators.

U.S. Constitution – Article 1 Section 4 – The U.S. Constitution Online – USConstitution.net - U.S. Constitution.net

U.S. Constitution – Article 1 Section 4 Article 1 – The Legislative Branch Section 4 – Elections, Meetings <<Back | Table of Contents | Next>> The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the...

www.usconstitution.net

 

[kyzr]

1. Vote in-person unless have a written excuse, no mail-in ballots unless in the military or have a valid excuse
2. Voting ends on election day
3. Auditable paper ballots, counted/certified on election night.
4. Photo ID required to vote

Yep, that would end voter fraud.

 

[Manonthestreet]

 

[rightwinger]

States decide how their elections will be conducted

 

[Rawley]

States decide how their elections will be conducted

"Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations"

 

[StatesRightsForever]

The FF were extreme states rightists and i'm surprised they put this clause in the constitution.

 

[StatesRightsForever]

States decide how their elections will be conducted

that's what i thought but i guess we were both wrong.

 

[tshrimp]

"Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations"

Not a good idea for the federal government to do this IMO. Do you really think if if the Dems take over they won't use the opportunity to nationalize voter fraud.

 

[eagle7-31]

Not a good idea for the federal government to do this IMO. Do you really think if if the Dems take over they won't use the opportunity to nationalize voter fraud.

good point.

 

[Rawley]

Not a good idea for the federal government to do this IMO. Do you really think if if the Dems take over they won't use the opportunity to nationalize voter fraud.

They already have. The Federal form for voter registration does not require any proof of citizenship. Only a signature.

National Mail Voter Registration Form | U.S. Election Assistance Commission

The National Mail Voter Registration Form can be used to register U.S. citizens to vote, to update registration information due to a change of name, make a change of address or to register with a political party.

www.eac.gov

National Voter Registration Act of 1993 - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[rightwinger]

that's what i thought but i guess we were both wrong.

Nope

 

[shockedcanadian]

They are going.to need to do something because the China-First, Never-Trumper Gavin Newsom is being aggressively rebranded. Deep pockets who want to see another 50M illegals, and.the blunting of your economy via climate change restrictions are heavily behind him.

 

[BluesLegend]

Democrats selectively defend state rights only when they are not trying to CRAM some perverted Federal trans/homo shit down everyone's throats.

 

[StatesRightsForever]

Not a good idea for the federal government to do this IMO. Do you really think if if the Dems take over they won't use the opportunity to nationalize voter fraud.

That's why the right has to do it right now. The dems plan on cheating massively in november to take control of congress. They know the press will back them.

 

[westwall]

The FF were extreme states rightists and i'm surprised they put this clause in the constitution.

They knew that eventually certain states would go rogue. This is an emergency valve.

 

[scruffy]

"Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations"

So why don't they?

Where's the beef?

 

[Rawley]

So why don't they?

Where's the beef?

The filibuster

 

[Dragonlady]

1. Vote in-person unless have a written excuse, no mail-in ballots unless in the military or have a valid excuse.

Also, red states have closed over 1000 polling stations in mostly poor neighbourhoods to suppress the vote. Polling stations need to be reopened to accommodate all of the election day voting.

2. Voting ends on election day
3. Auditable paper ballots, counted/certified on election night.
4. Photo ID required to vote

Yep, that would end voter fraud.

1. Impossible to enforce. It has been the GOP who depended on mail in votes. The elderly, disabled, and working people need time off to vote.

2. This has always been true.

3. This too has always been done.

4. Also always true. What is being argued is what type of photo ID.

Republicans want a special voter registration card so they can control who gets them. Democrats want to use any government issued photo ID.

 

[IM2]

Not a good idea for the federal government to do this IMO. Do you really think if if the Dems take over they won't use the opportunity to nationalize voter fraud.

The only fraud that has been caught has been republican.

 

[IM2]

They are going.to need to do something because the China-First, Never-Trumper Gavin Newsom is being aggressively rebranded. Deep pockets who want to see another 50M illegals, and.the blunting of your economy via climate change restrictions are heavily behind him.

You are a complete fool. Go tell your PM this stuff and see what you get.