WSJ: The World Bakes Under Extreme Heat

It has been known for quite a while that CO2 LAGS temperature.

That means it is exactly what you say. An indicator, not a initiater.
It's been known that it lags in Natural cycles BUT (lesser known) it also exacerbates that warming.
(it's a GHG after all!)(Duh!)

So this Cycle, which unlike the others in that it was not Solar Forced (earth tilt cycle, etc), CO2 and other GHGs Lead the warming due to the Giant 50% increase in them generated by human emissions.


`
 
It's been known that it lags in Natural cycles BUT (lesser known) it also exacerbates that warming.
(it's a GHG after all!)(Duh!)

So this Cycle, which unlike the others in that it was not Solar Forced (earth tilt cycle, etc), CO2 and other GHGs Lead the warming due to the Giant 50% increase in them generated by human emissions.


`


Lesser known, equals computer derived fiction. There is no empirical data to support your claim.

None.
 
Lesser known, equals computer derived fiction. There is no empirical data to support your claim.

None.
The reason CO2/CH4 etc are called/Are Greenhouse Gases is "Computer Driven fiction"?
No.
You Lie a lot to protect your stupid MAGAt positions.
`
 
Last edited:
The reason CO2/CH4 etc are called/Are Greenhouse Gases is "Computer Driven fiction"?
No.
You Lie a lot to protect your stupid MAGAt positions.
`


No, they are known to be GHG's, silly one. They are also in such tiny amounts that they only have a magical power in computer models.

In the real world they aren't capable of doing anything.
 
It's been known that it lags in Natural cycles BUT (lesser known) it also exacerbates that warming.
(it's a GHG after all!)(Duh!)

So this Cycle, which unlike the others in that it was not Solar Forced (earth tilt cycle, etc), CO2 and other GHGs Lead the warming due to the Giant 50% increase in them generated by human emissions.


`
Where’s the datasets to show this heat?
 
Wasn’t hurricanes the number one metric? Me thinks so. When number one fails, the rest are useless

Inland storms, floods, and drought, and fires, has likely equaled or surpassed hurricane damage as a climate change metric.
 
Last edited:
There are other metrics besides hurricanes.


Yes, but it is more difficult to fudge the data on canes.

It is much easier to say "temperatures are rising" because a legion of parroting moron science invalids like yourself will parrot without having any clue how such a claim was sustained.

Canes are directly correlated with ocean temperature. We have the conflicted fudgebaking taxpayer funded liars claiming the oceans are warming, and the truth of the canes saying THEY ARE NOT...
 
Yes, but it is more difficult to fudge the data on canes.

It is much easier to say "temperatures are rising" because a legion of parroting moron science invalids like yourself will parrot without having any clue how such a claim was sustained.

Canes are directly correlated with ocean temperature. We have the conflicted fudgebaking taxpayer funded liars claiming the oceans are warming, and the truth of the canes saying THEY ARE NOT...
Hurricanes are generally restricted to familiar zones, not oceanwide. Most areas of the oceans can absorb huge amounts of heat without spawning hurricanes.
 
Hurricanes are generally restricted to familiar zones, not oceanwide. Most areas of the oceans can absorb huge amounts of heat without spawning hurricanes.



This is the type of crap answer you get. Hurricanes require warm water. The warmer the water, the stronger the cane.

And while the cane data shows the Co2 fraud is full of shit about ocean "warming," the parroting moron science invalids are given talking points to blabber... which essentially claims

The oceans have absorbed all this "heat" but for some reason HAVE NOT WARMED AT ALL IN THE PROCESS.


Indeed, the Co2 Fraud's attempt in Hawaii is exposing the truth not just about Hawaii but also the Pacific Ocean. Hawaii is not warming. There is no way to spin that. If Hawaii is not warming, is the Pacific Ocean?

LOL!!!


FUCK NO!!!
 
How can they have not warmed?


Well, because Co2 hasn't warmed anything, 90% of Earth ice on Antarctica has been growing every year, and hence there is no ongoing net ice melt, no ocean rise.

What is the evidence oceans have warmed?

100% pure FUDGED FRAUD

That's it....
 

Forum List

Back
Top