mal
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #101
The proverbial coathanger in the proverbial back alley isn't meant to be taken literally, I think. The underlying point is, making it illegal will introduce a greater amount of health risks to the woman who needs it bad enough. Personally, I suspect that for the more rabid social conservatives, the increased risk to those womens' health is an acceptable trade-off for the symbolic victory of a Roe v Wade overturn.
So 10's of Millions of Babies that have been Executed since Roe were Justified because of the Possibility of Death to the Mother for a TINY percentage, or the idea that Women would do Dangerous things to get the Inconvenience out of them?...
Noted.
peace...
I'm not 100% sure if you're actually asking me an honest question, or if that's a rhetorical trick so you can try and restate my post in a way that's comfy for your preformed position and feewings on the topic.
I'll go with the latter. If it makes you feel better, go put a "abortion=genocide" bumpersticker on your car.
Silky... What Percentage of he 30 or 40 Million Abortions since Roe have been for Convenience in your Opinion?...
And after that, let me know what Percentage, with Documentation, saved a Woman's Life.
peace...