If he succeeds in transferring the brain intact but none of the nerves reconnect, that brain will be in complete isolation from the world, possibly for decades. I'd rather be dead.
no it wouldnt they wouldnt keep it alive
Interesting ethical question: do you terminate a living person that may or may not want to be terminated?
It's not interesting, it's the platform that progressives launch from.
Nazis agreed..yes, you do.
Commies said..absolutely.
Spartans..you bet.
Romans...yup.
Muslims...100%
And they all justified it by saying that some people aren't really PEOPLE in the sense that they have the rights that WE have. Nazis started out with the idea that you breed to a type...perfect babies, perfect breeders, kill the lame, halt, insane, malformed. They moved on to also killing Jews, Gypsies, Catholics, Jehovah's Witnesses, Blacks...
Commies maintain that there are too many people, so for the betterment of the many they kill many. The many usually happen to be living in areas that the leaders want control of.
Spartans killed everybody including their own children, they maintained that if you were weak, you weren't entirely human.
Romans killed slaves, Christians and barbarians for fun, and thought themselves quite civilized and superior to the ones they killed.
Muslims believe it's okay to kill anybody who isn't a Muslim. Though they also feels it's okay to kill muslims.
Pretty much every murderous group the world has ever known sprang from the concept that there are people who don't deserve life because they aren't quite up to whatever standard is the current one. It's the life's blood of the progressives, this concept.