Wonder why people distrust political stories in the media?

[Hossfly]

CNN just had a breaking news banner that said,
BREAKING:
GOP & TRUMP SUPPORT ACCUSED CHILD MOLESTOR ROY MOORE

Can they be any more blatant with their bias? I think not.

What bias? He has been accused of child molestation AND Trump and the GOP announced yesterday they support him.
This is solely about blind support of your team and has NOTHING to do with the media.

What about the other day when one of the crones on The View repeated a false "Special Report" that had already been discounted as false. What was funny is when she read the bulletin, the 4 women at the desk all had multiple orgasms. If that wasn't bias then WTF was it?

 

[HappyJoy]

What part of that isn't true?

What part of my post said it was or wasn't true?

I'm focused on the complete & total bias.
That is an inflammtory headline ment for one thing & one thing only.
It's borderline liable imo

It's not inflammatory, Trump and the GOP are now backing a candidate accused of child molestation. That's called news.

What's the difference from Hillary being accused of causing many murders and capital crimes? Within the past 40 years as opposed to Moore's accusers 40 years ago and earlier?

I guess the difference would be your hypocrisy.

Also, how many people here have proclaimed Moore is innocent? As opposed to the many lefties who denies Hillary's guilt? And who would want that scumbag for President.

Kind of bouncing all over the place, aren't ya'?

 

[Hossfly]

What part of that isn't true?

What part of my post said it was or wasn't true?

I'm focused on the complete & total bias.
That is an inflammtory headline ment for one thing & one thing only.
It's borderline liable imo

It's not inflammatory, Trump and the GOP are now backing a candidate accused of child molestation. That's called news.

What's the difference from Hillary being accused of causing many murders and capital crimes? Within the past 40 years as opposed to Moore's accusers 40 years ago and earlier?

I guess the difference would be your hypocrisy.

Also, how many people here have proclaimed Moore is innocent? As opposed to the many lefties who denies Hillary's guilt? And who would want that scumbag for President.

Kind of bouncing all over the place, aren't ya'?

Did you take your medication this morning?

 

[HappyJoy]

What part of that isn't true?

What part of my post said it was or wasn't true?

I'm focused on the complete & total bias.
That is an inflammtory headline ment for one thing & one thing only.
It's borderline liable imo

It's not inflammatory, Trump and the GOP are now backing a candidate accused of child molestation. That's called news.

What's the difference from Hillary being accused of causing many murders and capital crimes? Within the past 40 years as opposed to Moore's accusers 40 years ago and earlier?

I guess the difference would be your hypocrisy.

Also, how many people here have proclaimed Moore is innocent? As opposed to the many lefties who denies Hillary's guilt? And who would want that scumbag for President.

Kind of bouncing all over the place, aren't ya'?

Did you take your medication this morning?

Not yet.

 

[jc456]

What part of my post said it was or wasn't true?

I'm focused on the complete & total bias.
That is an inflammtory headline ment for one thing & one thing only.
It's borderline liable imo

It's not inflammatory, Trump and the GOP are now backing a candidate accused of child molestation. That's called news.

What's the difference from Hillary being accused of causing many murders and capital crimes? Within the past 40 years as opposed to Moore's accusers 40 years ago and earlier?

I guess the difference would be your hypocrisy.

Also, how many people here have proclaimed Moore is innocent? As opposed to the many lefties who denies Hillary's guilt? And who would want that scumbag for President.

Kind of bouncing all over the place, aren't ya'?

Did you take your medication this morning?

Not yet.

sorry

 

[Pogo]

CNN just had a breaking news banner that said,
BREAKING:
GOP & TRUMP SUPPORT ACCUSED CHILD MOLESTOR ROY MOORE

Can they be any more blatant with their bias? I think not.

Despite the denials and deflection, a President with a (D) after his name would not have that written about them.

Par for the course.
.

Uhhh----- Roy Moore is not a president of anything.

common sense says he's referring to Trump.

knowing you, you know that but can't just agree on something so gotta go there.

The alleged headline is about Roy Moore though. It is Roy Moore who is the "accused", not the president.

here is what was posted:

CNN just had a breaking news banner that said,
BREAKING:
GOP & TRUMP SUPPORT ACCUSED CHILD MOLESTOR ROY MOORE

like i said - for some asinine reason we have a group of people who will argue to the end of the world, knowing they're wrong, just based on WHO they are talking to and their sheer denial to ever "cave in" to what someone else thinks.

however, since there is no source for the headline itself, it's all pretty stupid. you just had to do your usual "compounding" of stupid.

No shit. It was I who pointed out that the headline was unsourced, but whatever its veracity, the poster misread it, and I then pointed out how he misread it.

If that chaps your hide, tough titty.

 

[Pogo]

CNN just had a breaking news banner that said,
BREAKING:
GOP & TRUMP SUPPORT ACCUSED CHILD MOLESTOR ROY MOORE

Can they be any more blatant with their bias? I think not.

What bias? He has been accused of child molestation AND Trump and the GOP announced yesterday they support him.
This is solely about blind support of your team and has NOTHING to do with the media.

What about the other day when one of the crones on The View repeated a false "Special Report" that had already been discounted as false. What was funny is when she read the bulletin, the 4 women at the desk all had multiple orgasms. If that wasn't bias then WTF was it?

Some outstanding porn on your computer?

 

[iceberg]

Despite the denials and deflection, a President with a (D) after his name would not have that written about them.

Par for the course.
.

Uhhh----- Roy Moore is not a president of anything.

common sense says he's referring to Trump.

knowing you, you know that but can't just agree on something so gotta go there.

The alleged headline is about Roy Moore though. It is Roy Moore who is the "accused", not the president.

here is what was posted:

CNN just had a breaking news banner that said,
BREAKING:
GOP & TRUMP SUPPORT ACCUSED CHILD MOLESTOR ROY MOORE

like i said - for some asinine reason we have a group of people who will argue to the end of the world, knowing they're wrong, just based on WHO they are talking to and their sheer denial to ever "cave in" to what someone else thinks.

however, since there is no source for the headline itself, it's all pretty stupid. you just had to do your usual "compounding" of stupid.

No shit. It was I who pointed out that the headline was unsourced, but whatever its veracity, the poster misread it, and I then pointed out how he misread it.

If that chaps your hide, tough titty.

Wow! That was YOU??? now we know who to send today's internet award too.

Whew. That was close.

 

[Hossfly]

CNN just had a breaking news banner that said,
BREAKING:
GOP & TRUMP SUPPORT ACCUSED CHILD MOLESTOR ROY MOORE

Can they be any more blatant with their bias? I think not.

What bias? He has been accused of child molestation AND Trump and the GOP announced yesterday they support him.
This is solely about blind support of your team and has NOTHING to do with the media.

What about the other day when one of the crones on The View repeated a false "Special Report" that had already been discounted as false. What was funny is when she read the bulletin, the 4 women at the desk all had multiple orgasms. If that wasn't bias then WTF was it?

Some outstanding porn on your computer?

Them View bitches are better than porn.