Women look better when they are in their place

We are quite well educated. We see that women are free citizens in the US, and that is a good thing.

I know you want a subservient woman. Your insecurities can't handle a strong, independent woman.
Not free. They are required to be men now, and are deprived of the right of womanhood
 
It can be. But the strength exhibited by women in the 1940s did not include independence.
You ******* idiot, make a 3 year old "independent" and tell him how much better it made him.
 
If a woman is mentally healthy, she dreams not of independence, but of a knight who will protect her. Such is the nature of women, and no one would change it if it were not for the fraud of feminists.

It is unpleasant for a man to be dependent because it calls into question his honour and man qualities, for a woman it is normal because she does not pretend to be man.

 
so you think women today are stronger than women in the 1940s. I totally disagree.

I think you enjoy trying to force me to say what you want me to say.

I also disagree that women are stronger today than women in the 1940s.
 
Not free. They are required to be men now, and are deprived of the right of womanhood

Deprived of womanhood? No idea how someone does that.

And no, they are not required to be men. They are allowed to be whomever they choose.
 
All patriarchal peoples have beautiful dances, such as the Cossacks and Latin Americans. In these dances, women take their rightful place. And if it were not so, then the beauty of the dance would disappear.





The "men can give birth" crowd isn't going to like this...
 
If a woman is mentally healthy, she dreams not of independence, but of a knight who will protect her. Such is the nature of women, and no one would change it if it were not for the fraud of feminists.

It is unpleasant for a man to be dependent because it calls into question his honour and man qualities, for a woman it is normal because she does not pretend to be man.

That you claim to know what a mentally healthy woman dreams of is laughable.
 
I think you enjoy trying to force me to say what you want me to say.

I also disagree that women are stronger today than women in the 1940s.
I just wanted to clarify your comments. You still make no sense.
 
I just wanted to clarify your comments. You still make no sense.

If a woman had 4 kids in the 1940s, there was a good chance that two of them would die. A woman would still have a husband and 2 kids to take care of while she grieved. That is strength.

A woman had to be able to be the head of the household when her husband went to war. That is strength.

A woman had to cook, wash, iron, clean and raise kids without the benefit of modern appliances. That is strength.

But none of those types of strength are independence.
 
15th post
If a woman had 4 kids in the 1940s, there was a good chance that two of them would die. A woman would still have a husband and 2 kids to take care of while she grieved. That is strength.

A woman had to be able to be the head of the household when her husband went to war. That is strength.

A woman had to cook, wash, iron, clean and raise kids without the benefit of modern appliances. That is strength.

But none of those types of strength are independence.
So we are clear woman are weaker today.. thanks. More independence made woman weak.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom