Women Know Your Limits

[Hypatia415]

The crime stats prove they are you blithering idiot.

Would you care to provide those "crime stats"? Or are you just relying on RW hearsay and gossip or RW crypto fascist sites as did our dear friend SweetSue92?

 

[Senior]

There were ~98,190 reported rapes across Europe in 2024.

There were ~128,000 reported rapes across the US in 2024.

 

[22lcidw]

The world is not some sci fi fantasy of utopia with women in charge. Women are the most selfish of the sexes. And have the most spent on them, spend on themselves and pushed with equality. You take the not so good with the good. And we are in decline.

 

[SweetSue92]

Your comments are not germane to the topic of the thread which deals with American RW male Christian nationalists who, if they ever got their way, would see you as a woman denied the vote and Jews denied any say in US law - from the article:

Joel Webbon also takes the Jews to task, saying that, while they might be allowed to live in the United States, they should not have any say in its laws. On his Right Response podcast, Pastor Webbon stated:

You don't get to drive the bus, if you're someone who's not a Christian, and even more that not just not a Christian, but someone whose entire religion is founded on the rejection of Christ.[...]

So, in the ideal Christian Nationalist state, as envisioned by Webbon, Partridge, and Robinson, women would be denied the vote, immigration would cease and non-European immigrants would be deported, and Jews would be denied the right to hold public office.

Do you think all the above would be a positive move for the future USA?

These are fringe beliefs, you realize. Rapes have not gone up in this nation due to ANYTHING these men have said. You realize, again, what the men in the OP claimed? Yet you, self-admittedly, come from a place where rapes ARE up because of the culture/beliefs of a group of people.

All correct so far?

 

[Mac-7]

A growing trend among those on the Christian Right is premised on a stereotypical view of women that reflects religious biases.

From the same article:

So, in the ideal Christian Nationalist state, as envisioned by Webbon, Partridge, and Robinson, women would be denied the vote, immigration would cease and non-European immigrants would be deported, and Jews would be denied the right to hold public office.

It would be easy to dismiss these three clerics as members of a misogynous and racist fringe group. However, their vision of depriving women of the vote isn’t theirs alone. It is a key provision of the agenda of well-funded Christian Dominionists. One of its leaders is Douglas Wilson, the spiritual mentor of Secretary of War Pete Hegseth. Wilson has proposed replacing individual voting with a household voting system, in which each household—led by its masculine head—would have a single vote. In a 2025 survey involving 3,300 respondents, the Religion in Public blog found that 20.5 percent of Americans they questioned favored replacing our present system with one of household voting:

Men as the head of every household is the ideal situation

But that assumes they are good mrn

And many are not

In our modern anything-goes liberal society that libs created many men and equally few women, are qualified to raise a family in God’s image

We are tainted by liberal immorality

 

[Hypatia415]

These are fringe beliefs, you realize. Rapes have not gone up in this nation due to ANYTHING these men have said. You realize, again, what the men in the OP claimed? Yet you, self-admittedly, come from a place where rapes ARE up because of the culture/beliefs of a group of people.

All correct so far?

I am not entirely sure they are necessarily fringe beliefs. Again from the article:

In a 2025 survey involving 3,300 respondents, the Religion in Public blog found that 20.5 percent of Americans they questioned favored replacing our present system with one of household voting:

We also asked our respondents about women’s political rights, starting with the idea of a household vote. In our weighted sample, 20.5 percent of respondents agreed or strongly agreed with this proposal. Predictably, there is a gender gap – 24.2 percent of men and 16.9 percent of women agreed.16

So, assuming this survey reflects a cross section of Americans, it appears nearly one fourth of American men and a sixth of American women would favor effectively depriving women of the vote.

I ask again, do you consider all that would be a positive move for the future USA?

As to your remark about the increase in rapes in Europe you also need to factor increasing misogyny and the obnoxious views of men like Andrew Tate and Nick Fuentes who seem worryingly popular with a lot of younger men, and do not forget access to "hard core" porn. When one reads of schoolteachers being asked by boys as young as 14 if it is OK to choke/strangle your partner during sex [Sex education: Boys ask how to choke girls during sex - teacher] one has to wonder how and where such young people acquired the idea that it was ever OK?

 

[Hypatia415]

Men as the head of every household is the ideal situation

Says who? Or are you one of those men who considers that women's role in society should revolve around Kinder, Küche, Kirche?

In our modern anything-goes liberal society that libs created many men and equally few women, are qualified to raise a family in God’s image

What on earth does that even mean?

We are tainted by liberal immorality

Never RW immorality? The likes of Mr Kirk, Mr Tate, and Mr Fuentes have a lot for which to answer.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Unfettered illegal aliens who are raping women????? Where You're delusional.

Furthermore, a study in Italy found that women were far more likely to report a rape if it was committed by a foreigner.

"Only 4.4% of women who said they were raped by an Italian filed a complaint about the incident, compared to 24.7% if they claim it was a foreigner, according to Istat."

Is illegal immigration to blame for rising sexual violence in Italy?

Italy's education minister sparked widespread outrage after claiming that the rise in sexual violence in the country is linked to illegal immigration, while delivering a message to a foundation that honours a woman who was killed by her ex-boyfriend. #EuroVerify

www.euronews.com

You're basically dreaming in technicolour if you believe immigrants are raping women all over Europe.

Have you been hitting the retard juice again?

The Ignored Link Between Mass Migration and Europe’s Rape Epidemic

Statistical data show that the growth in sexual assaults against women coincides with more immigration, a reality that only the European Right is ready to c ...

europeanconservative.com

 

[cowboy fan]

Right, a guy from Europe is so deeply interested in American politics that he posts all this detail on an American board. Nothing suspicious about that.

 

[Hypatia415]

Have you been hitting the retard juice again?

The Ignored Link Between Mass Migration and Europe’s Rape Epidemic

Statistical data show that the growth in sexual assaults against women coincides with more immigration, a reality that only the European Right is ready to c ...

europeanconservative.com

Oh look! Another RW site.

 

[Hypatia415]

Right, a guy from Europe is so deeply interested in American politics that he posts all this detail on an American board. Nothing suspicious about that.

?

 

[cowboy fan]

?

$

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Oh look! Another RW site.

All properly sourced with the stats and numbers from the governments. Too bad for you, huh.

The attacking the source fallacy occurs when someone dismisses an argument solely based on who made it, rather than addressing the argument’s actual merits.​

Definition​

The attacking the source fallacy, also known as ad hominem, involves rejecting or undermining a claim by targeting the person or source rather than the argument itself springhole.net+2. This fallacy diverts attention from the substance of the argument and focuses on irrelevant personal traits, motives, or affiliations of the individual making the claim Effectiviology. It assumes that flaws in the person automatically invalidate their argument, which is logically unsound.

Common Forms​

1. Personal Character Attacks: Criticizing someone’s character, habits, or background instead of engaging with their argument. For example, dismissing a tax policy proposal by saying, “You’re overweight, so your opinion on economics doesn’t count” logicallyfallacious.com.
2. Source-Based Dismissal: Rejecting information because of its origin, such as claiming, “You read it on Wikipedia, so it must be false,” without evaluating the content itself springhole.net.

 

[Mac-7]

Says who? Or are you one of those men who considers that women's role in society should revolve around Kinder, Küche, Kirche?

I think for single women or childless women in general working a job is acceptable

And often necessary

But children deserve a full time mother

 

[Mac-7]

What on earth does that even mean?

It means bad parenting

 

[Mac-7]

Never RW immorality? The likes of Mr Kirk, Mr Tate, and Mr Fuentes have a lot for which to answer.

Oh yes

Its impossible to throw rocks at libs without hitting some conservatives too

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Your comments are not germane to the topic of the thread which deals with American RW male Christian nationalists who, if they ever got their way, would see you as a woman denied the vote and Jews denied any say in US law - from the article:

Joel Webbon also takes the Jews to task, saying that, while they might be allowed to live in the United States, they should not have any say in its laws. On his Right Response podcast, Pastor Webbon stated:

You don't get to drive the bus, if you're someone who's not a Christian, and even more that not just not a Christian, but someone whose entire religion is founded on the rejection of Christ.[...]

So, in the ideal Christian Nationalist state, as envisioned by Webbon, Partridge, and Robinson, women would be denied the vote, immigration would cease and non-European immigrants would be deported, and Jews would be denied the right to hold public office.

Do you think all the above would be a positive move for the future USA?

If Islamists ever got their way, American women would be denied the vote and raped and Jews would be murdered.
Do you think all that would be a positive move for the future USA?

 

[Hypatia415]

It means bad parenting

You wrote:

In our modern anything-goes liberal society that libs created many men and equally few women, are qualified to raise a family in God’s image

Are you advocating killing disobedient sons (Deuteronomy) or selling daughters as slaves (Exodus)?

 

[Hypatia415]

If Islamists ever got their way, American women would be denied the vote and raped and Jews would be murdered.

This might help

 

[Hypatia415]

I think for single women or childless women in general working a job is acceptable

(sarcasm) How very magnanimous of you.

But children deserve a full time mother

Why not a full time father? Why should it be the woman who has to give up her job/career?