Woman arrested 15 years later for killing her newborns

[novasteve]

Woman, 34, arrested for murdering her newborn twins and dumping them down a trash chute 15 years ago | Mail Online

I think she could try the clump of cells defense . Might become an icon for feminists

 

[dilloduck]

Woman, 34, arrested for murdering her newborn twins and dumping them down a trash chute 15 years ago | Mail Online

I think she could try the clump of cells defense . Might become an icon for feminists

poor timing was her only real crime.

 

[kilosepp]

At the time of birth, they are living viable beings, not clumps of cells.

 

[novasteve]

Living viable beings arent clumps of cells?

 

[novasteve]

So you are either a single celled organism or are not made out of cells eh?

 

[kilosepp]

You didn't have to reply twice LOL

During the time of first trimester, the "baby" is not viable. '

Why does abortion upset you? Would you want a woman who doesn't want kids to have to have them? If abortion was illegal, stuff like this would happen more often.

 

[dilloduck]

You didn't have to reply twice LOL

During the time of first trimester, the "baby" is not viable. '

Why does abortion upset you? Would you want a woman who doesn't want kids to have to have them? If abortion was illegal, stuff like this would happen more often.

there are more options than killing the unborn and newly born. Let's not play pretend.

 

[Caroljo]

They're living viable things way before that......

 

[Caroljo]

Adoption?

 

[kilosepp]

You didn't have to reply twice LOL

During the time of first trimester, the "baby" is not viable. '

Why does abortion upset you? Would you want a woman who doesn't want kids to have to have them? If abortion was illegal, stuff like this would happen more often.

there are more options than killing the unborn and newly born. Let's not play pretend.

Who is the government to tell anyone what they have to do to their bodies? If it's during the first trimester, no viable being is harmed.

Why should a woman have to give birth, ruin her figure, and either force her newborn to be raised by someone who didn't want it or someone who isn't its real parent?

 

[novasteve]

Anything? So you must oppose vaccinations

 

[kilosepp]

Anything? So you must oppose vaccinations

Apples and oranges.

Vaccinations by and large protect the masses and don't allow viruses and illnesses to spread. A woman choosing not to have a kid effects no grown being accept the woman herself.

 

[dilloduck]

Anything? So you must oppose vaccinations

Apples and oranges.

Vaccinations by and large protect the masses and don't allow viruses and illnesses to spread. A woman choosing not to have a kid effects no grown being accept the woman herself.

We're not talking about hurting big beings. We are talking about killing little beings

 

[novasteve]

You didn't have to reply twice LOL

During the time of first trimester, the "baby" is not viable. '

Why does abortion upset you? Would you want a woman who doesn't want kids to have to have them? If abortion was illegal, stuff like this would happen more often.

there are more options than killing the unborn and newly born. Let's not play pretend.

Who is the government to tell anyone what they have to do to their bodies? If it's during the first trimester, no viable being is harmed.

Why should a woman have to give birth, ruin her figure, and either force her newborn to be raised by someone who didn't want it or someone who isn't its real parent?

Who is the government to tell anyone what to do with their bodies?

Your words. Now how is it apples and oranges?

 

[kilosepp]

there are more options than killing the unborn and newly born. Let's not play pretend.

Who is the government to tell anyone what they have to do to their bodies? If it's during the first trimester, no viable being is harmed.

Why should a woman have to give birth, ruin her figure, and either force her newborn to be raised by someone who didn't want it or someone who isn't its real parent?

Who is the government to tell anyone what to do with their bodies?

Your words. Now how is it apples and oranges?

Like I said, Steve, vaccinations are meant to protect that masses.

 

[dilloduck]

Who is the government to tell anyone what they have to do to their bodies? If it's during the first trimester, no viable being is harmed.

Why should a woman have to give birth, ruin her figure, and either force her newborn to be raised by someone who didn't want it or someone who isn't its real parent?

Who is the government to tell anyone what to do with their bodies?

Your words. Now how is it apples and oranges?

Like I said, Steve, vaccinations are meant to protect that masses.

Never the less it is STILL government telling you what to do with you body. They won't let you sell a kidney either

 

[novasteve]

So if anything is good for the masses the government can tell people what they must do with their bodies?

 

[novasteve]

So if there were more kids thus more taxpayers for the future it would be good for the masses and then the govt can tell women what to do with their bodies?

 

[kilosepp]

Who is the government to tell anyone what to do with their bodies?

Your words. Now how is it apples and oranges?

Like I said, Steve, vaccinations are meant to protect that masses.

Never the less it is STILL government telling you what to do with you body. They won't let you sell a kidney either

When viruses spread, unsuspecting living, viable, adult people are hurt and killed against their own will. When a woman has an abortion, she decides not to have a baby that she probably couldn't raise and no grown and viable being is harmed.

Apples and oranges.

 

[dilloduck]

The government makes you clothe your body ----the government has rules on how to dispose of your dead body. There's a zillion of them.