WIN- Mr Trump is All IN for 2020

[TheMoreYouKnow]

There will be 200,000 old white crusty rednecks who die off by then.

Another 2M young millennials will be able to vote during this election.

Most likely Filthy Don will be either in jail, asylum-ed in Russia or six feet underground in a piss mattress lined coffin.

But still there's a chance right....

 

[Confounding]

I don't see Trump winning a second term unless the Democrats seriously **** up. Maybe they'll run Hillary again.

 

[busybee01]

He was surprised that he even won the first time...lol.. there is not enough dumb asses to vote him in again..

Huh?
Did he barely squeak by in 2016 or something?
30 states and 2,623 counties....he *****-slapped the **** out of the DNC.

If Clinton had gotten 1.5% more in each state Clinton would have won. She was a pathetically weak candidate. Most of those counties are thinly populated.

Woulda, shoulda, coulda!

She lost!

At least you admit how weak she was, and yet she was by far the strongest Democrat and will probably be the strongest if she runs in 2020, and that shows how weak Democrats truly are!

Hillary Clinton was the weakest candidate Democrats could have run. Biden and even Sanders beat Trump by double digits. She got fewer votes in Ohio than McCain and Romney did. She won Colorado but got fewer votes than Romney did. She is not running in 2020. You have flipped your gold braid if you believe that.

 

[busybee01]

He was surprised that he even won the first time...lol.. there is not enough dumb asses to vote him in again..

Huh?
Did he barely squeak by in 2016 or something?
30 states and 2,623 counties....he *****-slapped the **** out of the DNC.

If Clinton had gotten 1.5% more in each state Clinton would have won. She was a pathetically weak candidate. Most of those counties are thinly populated.

You think you're going to win those counties with gun control, your taxes are too low and illegals need protection? Good ******* luck.

You don't have to win those counties. Looking at the elections in Virginia, New Jersey and Alabama as well as some special elections, a trend has developed. Democrats are doing better than Clinton did among suburban voters and women. Independents strongly disapprove of Trump.

Apparently you do. You said if the hildapig had won 1.5% more she would be president. You really think that's going to happen now? Do you think the middle of this country is going to vote for gun control, higher taxes and letting illegals stay? Good luck cupcake.

They don't need the middle of the country. All they have to do is turn Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania All of these states went for Trump by less than 1%. Michigan and Pennsylvania had low black turnout. Suburban and female voters could also spell the difference in NC as well.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Too early for this shit guys

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

He was surprised that he even won the first time...lol.. there is not enough dumb asses to vote him in again..

Huh?
Did he barely squeak by in 2016 or something?
30 states and 2,623 counties....he *****-slapped the **** out of the DNC.

If Clinton had gotten 1.5% more in each state Clinton would have won. She was a pathetically weak candidate. Most of those counties are thinly populated.

Woulda, shoulda, coulda!

She lost!

At least you admit how weak she was, and yet she was by far the strongest Democrat and will probably be the strongest if she runs in 2020, and that shows how weak Democrats truly are!

Hillary Clinton was the weakest candidate Democrats could have run. Biden and even Sanders beat Trump by double digits. She got fewer votes in Ohio than McCain and Romney did. She won Colorado but got fewer votes than Romney did. She is not running in 2020. You have flipped your gold braid if you believe that.

When did Biden and Sanders run against Trump? I hope you are not going by polls because you should have learned your lesson. Republicans don't answer polls because they work for a living.

She is showing no signs of going away. Biden is as old as Methuselah. Sanders is just plain nuts. Who else do the Dems have?

Nobodies!

If Clinton doesn't run, they will merely choose a sacrificial lamb for 2020 in hopes of having someone to take on Pence in 2024.

 

[Lastamender]

Huh?
Did he barely squeak by in 2016 or something?
30 states and 2,623 counties....he *****-slapped the **** out of the DNC.

If Clinton had gotten 1.5% more in each state Clinton would have won. She was a pathetically weak candidate. Most of those counties are thinly populated.

You think you're going to win those counties with gun control, your taxes are too low and illegals need protection? Good ******* luck.

You don't have to win those counties. Looking at the elections in Virginia, New Jersey and Alabama as well as some special elections, a trend has developed. Democrats are doing better than Clinton did among suburban voters and women. Independents strongly disapprove of Trump.

Apparently you do. You said if the hildapig had won 1.5% more she would be president. You really think that's going to happen now? Do you think the middle of this country is going to vote for gun control, higher taxes and letting illegals stay? Good luck cupcake.

They don't need the middle of the country. All they have to do is turn Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania All of these states went for Trump by less than 1%. Michigan and Pennsylvania had low black turnout. Suburban and female voters could also spell the difference in NC as well.

What makes you think Blacks will be voting Democratic in 2020?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Huh?
Did he barely squeak by in 2016 or something?
30 states and 2,623 counties....he *****-slapped the **** out of the DNC.

If Clinton had gotten 1.5% more in each state Clinton would have won. She was a pathetically weak candidate. Most of those counties are thinly populated.

You think you're going to win those counties with gun control, your taxes are too low and illegals need protection? Good ******* luck.

You don't have to win those counties. Looking at the elections in Virginia, New Jersey and Alabama as well as some special elections, a trend has developed. Democrats are doing better than Clinton did among suburban voters and women. Independents strongly disapprove of Trump.

Apparently you do. You said if the hildapig had won 1.5% more she would be president. You really think that's going to happen now? Do you think the middle of this country is going to vote for gun control, higher taxes and letting illegals stay? Good luck cupcake.

They don't need the middle of the country. All they have to do is turn Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania All of these states went for Trump by less than 1%. Michigan and Pennsylvania had low black turnout. Suburban and female voters could also spell the difference in NC as well.

You don't think those blue collar workers in those states will believe their tax cuts and bonuses are merely crumbs and want to elect Dems to guarantee they will never see a tax cut or bonus again?

You think black are going to turn out for Dems who will guarantee a return to the high unemployment rates they have suffered for decades? Do you think they will turn out for Dems who have turned their backs on them and gone whole hog in support of illegals from south of the border who take their jobs and suck up their benefits?

You really have gone where no one has gone before! What planet are you currently orbiting? It looks like you head is in Uranus!

 

[Zander]

LWNJ's have short memories.....from now until election day 2020, they'll cite the same polls, and rely upon the same pundits that soothed and assured them that hiLIARy was going to win with 98% assurance. She's a lock!! Trump can't win!!!

 

[Lakhota]

Trump may be in prison by 2020.

 

[busybee01]

He was surprised that he even won the first time...lol.. there is not enough dumb asses to vote him in again..

Huh?
Did he barely squeak by in 2016 or something?
30 states and 2,623 counties....he *****-slapped the **** out of the DNC.

If Clinton had gotten 1.5% more in each state Clinton would have won. She was a pathetically weak candidate. Most of those counties are thinly populated.

Woulda, shoulda, coulda!

She lost!

At least you admit how weak she was, and yet she was by far the strongest Democrat and will probably be the strongest if she runs in 2020, and that shows how weak Democrats truly are!

Hillary Clinton was the weakest candidate Democrats could have run. Biden and even Sanders beat Trump by double digits. She got fewer votes in Ohio than McCain and Romney did. She won Colorado but got fewer votes than Romney did. She is not running in 2020. You have flipped your gold braid if you believe that.

When did Biden and Sanders run against Trump? I hope you are not going by polls because you should have learned your lesson. Republicans don't answer polls because they work for a living.

She is showing no signs of going away. Biden is as old as Methuselah. Sanders is just plain nuts. Who else do the Dems have?

Nobodies!

If Clinton doesn't run, they will merely choose a sacrificial lamb for 2020 in hopes of having someone to take on Pence in 2024.

These are the same polls that CORRECTLY got the popular vote right. We can combine those polls with what we have seen in actual voting. Biden is only years older than Trump. Trump is plain nuts as well. Conspiracies everywhere. You may not need big name to beat Trump.

 

[busybee01]

If Clinton had gotten 1.5% more in each state Clinton would have won. She was a pathetically weak candidate. Most of those counties are thinly populated.

You think you're going to win those counties with gun control, your taxes are too low and illegals need protection? Good ******* luck.

You don't have to win those counties. Looking at the elections in Virginia, New Jersey and Alabama as well as some special elections, a trend has developed. Democrats are doing better than Clinton did among suburban voters and women. Independents strongly disapprove of Trump.

Apparently you do. You said if the hildapig had won 1.5% more she would be president. You really think that's going to happen now? Do you think the middle of this country is going to vote for gun control, higher taxes and letting illegals stay? Good luck cupcake.

They don't need the middle of the country. All they have to do is turn Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania All of these states went for Trump by less than 1%. Michigan and Pennsylvania had low black turnout. Suburban and female voters could also spell the difference in NC as well.

You don't think those blue collar workers in those states will believe their tax cuts and bonuses are merely crumbs and want to elect Dems to guarantee they will never see a tax cut or bonus again?

You think black are going to turn out for Dems who will guarantee a return to the high unemployment rates they have suffered for decades? Do you think they will turn out for Dems who have turned their backs on them and gone whole hog in support of illegals from south of the border who take their jobs and suck up their benefits?

You really have gone where no one has gone before! What planet are you currently orbiting? It looks like you head is in Uranus!

Blue collar voters are not the key. Suburban voters and women are the key. In Virginia, Gilmore did very well in the southern part of the state. but got buried in the suburbs. Women came out and strongly supported the Democrat.

Trump has a 90% disapproval rating among blacks. We had the CPAC communications director saying Michael Steele was elected RNC Chairman because he was a black guy. When Republicans honored black Republicans, they didn't bother to invite him. You think blacks are going to support that? DACA has strong support among all groups of voters.

You are the one living on Fantasy Island! Time to wake up.

 

[BluesLegend]

And in 2020 Trump has the advantage of being a sitting president and the bully pulpit, get some libs you are due for another beating.

Don't worry your little conservative brain.

The midterms will answer your ignorance.

Dem's will be destroyed and remain a party out of power, stock up on tissues.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Huh?
Did he barely squeak by in 2016 or something?
30 states and 2,623 counties....he *****-slapped the **** out of the DNC.

If Clinton had gotten 1.5% more in each state Clinton would have won. She was a pathetically weak candidate. Most of those counties are thinly populated.

Woulda, shoulda, coulda!

She lost!

At least you admit how weak she was, and yet she was by far the strongest Democrat and will probably be the strongest if she runs in 2020, and that shows how weak Democrats truly are!

Hillary Clinton was the weakest candidate Democrats could have run. Biden and even Sanders beat Trump by double digits. She got fewer votes in Ohio than McCain and Romney did. She won Colorado but got fewer votes than Romney did. She is not running in 2020. You have flipped your gold braid if you believe that.

When did Biden and Sanders run against Trump? I hope you are not going by polls because you should have learned your lesson. Republicans don't answer polls because they work for a living.

She is showing no signs of going away. Biden is as old as Methuselah. Sanders is just plain nuts. Who else do the Dems have?

Nobodies!

If Clinton doesn't run, they will merely choose a sacrificial lamb for 2020 in hopes of having someone to take on Pence in 2024.

These are the same polls that CORRECTLY got the popular vote right. We can combine those polls with what we have seen in actual voting. Biden is only years older than Trump. Trump is plain nuts as well. Conspiracies everywhere. You may not need big name to beat Trump.

We don't elect a President based on polls or the popular vote, dumbass! Catch a clue!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

You think you're going to win those counties with gun control, your taxes are too low and illegals need protection? Good ******* luck.

You don't have to win those counties. Looking at the elections in Virginia, New Jersey and Alabama as well as some special elections, a trend has developed. Democrats are doing better than Clinton did among suburban voters and women. Independents strongly disapprove of Trump.

Apparently you do. You said if the hildapig had won 1.5% more she would be president. You really think that's going to happen now? Do you think the middle of this country is going to vote for gun control, higher taxes and letting illegals stay? Good luck cupcake.

They don't need the middle of the country. All they have to do is turn Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania All of these states went for Trump by less than 1%. Michigan and Pennsylvania had low black turnout. Suburban and female voters could also spell the difference in NC as well.

You don't think those blue collar workers in those states will believe their tax cuts and bonuses are merely crumbs and want to elect Dems to guarantee they will never see a tax cut or bonus again?

You think black are going to turn out for Dems who will guarantee a return to the high unemployment rates they have suffered for decades? Do you think they will turn out for Dems who have turned their backs on them and gone whole hog in support of illegals from south of the border who take their jobs and suck up their benefits?

You really have gone where no one has gone before! What planet are you currently orbiting? It looks like you head is in Uranus!

Blue collar voters are not the key. Suburban voters and women are the key. In Virginia, Gilmore did very well in the southern part of the state. but got buried in the suburbs. Women came out and strongly supported the Democrat.

Trump has a 90% disapproval rating among blacks. We had the CPAC communications director saying Michael Steele was elected RNC Chairman because he was a black guy. When Republicans honored black Republicans, they didn't bother to invite him. You think blacks are going to support that? DACA has strong support among all groups of voters.

You are the one living on Fantasy Island! Time to wake up.

Where do you think blue collar workers live, dumbass?