This is a great short video that must be shared to the public. This is pretty much the way I understand it.
Didn't watch it all but I did like how it accused the pro-vax side of fear mongering and then spent the next several minutes doing exactly that.
Maybe they talk about it later but the part I watched didn't talk about the dangers of NOT getting vaccinated, only the vax dangers. Are they equally risky? I bet the danger of Covid is much greater than the danger of the vax.
Maybe you should watch the whole thing. The most at risk group--over 85 years old had a 99.2% survival rate. Every other group had a greater survival rate than that. But that's OK, you do what you want to do. I will not tell emperor Biden that he has a nice set of new clothes. Moron.
You may OK with having to go to a hospital or having long term issues, the odds of those are much higher. If your odds of having a mild case of covid are 99% while odds of having no problems with the vax are 99.999%, which would you choose?
We have no idea of what the effects are of the injection. We do know that tens of thousands have died from it compared to the 1976 swine flu in which 53 people died and the vaccine program was shut down. We also know that it is an experimental drug with only two months of clinical trials. Every other vaccine that has been brought to market has taken 8-12 years.
"We do know that tens of thousands have died from it"???? Sounds like Fake News to me.
I hope you're not using Tucker Carlson as a source. Dr Anthony Fauci, the US’ leading expert on infectious diseases and Chief Medical Advisor to President Joe Biden, has termed Carlson’s claims that covid vaccines are ineffective as “a crazy conspiracy theory.”
Fauxchi has also contradicted every guidance that he has offered during the past two years. He also has admitted to lying about numerous aspects. See Rand Paul questioning Fauci about gain of function funding to the Wuhan lab. You really need to keep up junior.
Did I miss your link to the "We do know that tens of thousands have died from it" claim or would the link be to your anus?
Dr Fauci admitted he lied to us about wearing masks early on. He did it for an arguably good reason: to make sure healthcare workers had access. Was it the right decision? I don't know but I can't condone being lied to.
I did follow the gain of function discussion but also found
this:
So, did the NIH’s
grant to EcoHealth fund gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab? There are differing opinions on that. As noted above, whether research is “likely” or “reasonably anticipated” to enhance transmissibility can be subjective.
EcoHealth and the NIH and NIAID say no. “EcoHealth Alliance has not nor does it plan to engage in gain-of-function research,” EcoHealth spokesman Robert Kessler told us in an email. Nor did the grant get an exception from the pause, as some have speculated, he said. “No dispensation was needed as no gain-of-function research was being conducted.”
You really need to keep up old man.
VAERS reporting over 5600 deaths. European reporting over 10,000 deaths due to injection. Try to keep up. The deaths are increasing. Again, we don't know the effects of these drugs. Those are all facts.
VAERS is a questionable source, but even if true are there more deaths from the virus or the vaccine?
As states across the U.S. expand the eligibility for getting a COVID-19 shot, a conservative website blasted out a warning from Europe.
The Gateway Pundit claimed two of the vaccines being used in the United States are behind thousands of deaths and injuries in Europe.
"From Europe: 3,964 people have died from adverse drug reactions for COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ – 162,610 injuries," said the headline of the March 28
story, which was shared on Facebook.
The Facebook post was flagged as part of Facebook’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our
partnership with Facebook.)
The Gateway Pundit cites information from
Global Research, a Canadian website run by the Centre for Research on Globalization, which was
accused by NATO of posting conspiracy theories, spreading Russian disinformation and undermining Western media.
The post specifically looks at vaccines from Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna and AstraZeneca, offering a breakdown of the different injuries and deaths purportedly associated with each vaccine using numbers from a European Union-maintained database called
EudraVigilance.
The implication is the COVID-19 vaccines are harmful and could result in injury or death.
However, the numbers are taken out of context to exaggerate the risk of vaccines.
The EudraVigilance database itself cautions the information it collects is for "suspected side effects ... but which are not necessarily related to our caused by the medicine."
"Information on suspected side effects should not be interpreted as meaning that the medicine or the active substance causes the observed effect or is unsafe to use,"
EudraVigilance’s website says. "Only a detailed evaluation and scientific assessment of all available data allows for robust conclusions to be drawn on the benefits and risks of a medicine."
Taking the raw data of possible COVID-19 vaccination reactions at face value and using them without context is an oft-used tactic by people attempting to undermine public confidence in the vaccines,
according to the New York Times. They frequently interpret the numbers from EudraVigilance or from its United States counterpart, the
Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, as evidence of the vaccines’ dangers.
Since VAERS doesn’t show whether an adverse event was caused by the vaccine or occurred coincidentally, it’s generally not useful on its own for assessing whether a vaccine poses a risk to human health, Dr. Walter Orenstein, associate director of the Emory Vaccine Center in Atlanta,
previously told PolitiFact.