Sub-saharan is the designation for where the negroid race originated, and trying to make it seem that Egypt is part of the sub-saharan/negroid culture/race is nothing but bullcrap. They Egyptians were not negroids. There has NEVER been any modern or any adavanced negroid civilization. They have built no major cities, no great roads, no ports, no hospitals, no universities, no ocean going vessels, no air travel, no nothing. Quite the contrary, when left intact civilizatins by the white Europeans, such as was the case in Rhodesia, they have destroyed that civilization. White ruled Rhodesia exported beef and agricultural goods throughout africa and the world and the quality of life was pretty good. The negroes "took back" their nation, renamed it Zimbabwe, threw the Rhodesians off the farms they built and worked and gave the farms to their negro countrymen, now they are starving in Zimbabwe. Not being able to build or maintain a civilized, prosperous nation on their own is the story all over black africa and is repeated throughout the world, in every nation, where large numbers of negroes decide to emigrate to. Too many blame the negro's plight in this nation on slavery, but the truth is that it is the same in nations that never had a history of importing negro slaves and is the case in their own nations in africa. Now the left, especially the white guilt filled scrotes of the left, can whine, cry and deny this all they want, but the archeological, sociological, anthropoligical and historical evidence, not to mention current events, proves them to be an inferior race/culture that has not advanced at the same rate as the Mongoloid or Caucasoid races/cultures. This is a fact plain and simple.
This weak old fool is the perfect example of what I was talking about.
