Will the treasonous seditious Obama, Brennan, Clapper , Comey , et al, see the inside of a federal Supermax?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Contumacious

Radical Freedom
Joined
Aug 16, 2009
Messages
23,248
Reaction score
5,393
Points
280
Location
Adjuntas, PR , USA
1754439425984.webp


MAGAland is cautiously optimistic that someone—anyone—finally will face consequences for unleashing the most destructive, deceptive, and costly abuse of government power against a single political figure and his movement in American history.his week, the Department of Justice ramped up investigations into the origins and extension of the Russiagate hoax amid new disclosures that give greater clarity as to exactly what went down in 2016 when top Obama officials, including the sitting president himself, conceived plans to sabotage Donald Trump before and after the presidential election. Attorney General Pamela Bondi just tasked a prosecutor with presenting evidence of a criminal conspiracy to a federal grand jury; the move follows criminal referrals sent to the Department of Justice last month by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard.


 
I won't say no yet... if not they will have to empty their bank accounts defending themselves in court.... so that's something and that will give people something to think about before they try this crap again...
 
I won't say no yet... if not they will have to empty their bank accounts defending themselves in court.... so that's something and that will give people something to think about before they try this crap again...
LOL!!! Trump will TACO. He’s already walking back the on the Murdoch deposition.
 
Some of them could. A lot will depend on the statute of limitations which may have run out for some, but may still be enforceable with some.
The coverup, which continues to this very day, is integral to the overall conspiracy....This obviates the statute of limitations.
 
The coverup, which continues to this very day, is integral to the overall conspiracy....This obviates the statute of limitations.

I would not disagree. When it comes to treason, there cannot be any statute. In fact, I'm generally against all statute of limitations since they only tend to serve the courts and the criminals.
 
I would not disagree. When it comes to treason, there cannot be any statute. In fact, I'm generally against all statute of limitations since they only tend to serve the courts and the criminals.
Point being is that the continued coverup, means that the criminal acts committed beyond the normal state of limitations window are still eligible for indictment and prosecution.
 
The invasion of 15 million illegals was a far more serious CRIME. Countless Democrats should be rotting in prison for that.

Here's reality, there's not a chance in hell ZERO that the first black/gay president will be sent to prison. The GOP is far too gutless to do that. They might toss some old white guys in a cell, maybe.
 
Point being is that the continued coverup, means that the criminal acts committed beyond the normal state of limitations window are still eligible for indictment and prosecution.

If I had my way, all of them would already be arrested and charged. Let their own attorney at their expense argue against the charges and conditions.
 
The coverup, which continues to this very day, is integral to the overall conspiracy....This obviates the statute of limitations.
The cover up that’s going on is the extent of Trump’s involvement with Epstein.
 
15th post
View attachment 1145473

MAGAland is cautiously optimistic that someone—anyone—finally will face consequences for unleashing the most destructive, deceptive, and costly abuse of government power against a single political figure and his movement in American history.his week, the Department of Justice ramped up investigations into the origins and extension of the Russiagate hoax amid new disclosures that give greater clarity as to exactly what went down in 2016 when top Obama officials, including the sitting president himself, conceived plans to sabotage Donald Trump before and after the presidential election. Attorney General Pamela Bondi just tasked a prosecutor with presenting evidence of a criminal conspiracy to a federal grand jury; the move follows criminal referrals sent to the Department of Justice last month by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard.



Some of them could. A lot will depend on the statute of limitations which may have run out for some, but may still be enforceable with some.
Whatever is within the law and won't require more resources than they're worth.

J.P. Morgan and Bank of America did some seriously shady stuff.
Could be considered election interference.
 
If only you could figure out what they’re going to be charged with.

Not that it matters to any of you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom