Will Social Media Get It Done?

[Flanders]

From the day the United Nations succeeded the League of Nations people of enormous wealth and political influence shutdown all public discourse in opposition to U.S. membership in the UN. Nothing has changed since 1945:

​

The UN Resolution that issued Israel’s death warrant triggered a greater outcry than did all of the combined United Nations disgraces in the past 72 years. Resolution 2334 was reported in newspapers and on television for a few days then dropped before it could do more damage to the UN’s already shoddy reputation.

Resolution 2334 never stood a chance on television as did missing flight MH370 and countless other death stories that television’s ghouls fed on for months. A sprinkling of voices do mention 2334, and even criticize the United Nations itself, but the Internet is only thing keeping opposition to the United Nations alive. The following should be a major story, but you will not hear it on television:

In response to the U.N.’s recent resolution condemning Israel, a major effort is under way to urge the U.S. to withdraw its funding of the global body, with some critics even calling for complete withdrawal and the expulsion of U.N. headquarters from American soil.​

Big list of leaders calling for U.S. to defund U.N.
Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 01/07/2017 @ 8:31 pm

Big list of leaders calling for U.S. to defund U.N.​

Only time will tell if social media has become big enough to move Congress to pass H.R. 1205. I have hopes that withdrawal’s time has come even though it’s been around since 1997 and never got out of committee. (Previously H.R. 1146 and H.R. 75.)

H. R. 1205 Is Looking Good

Finally, Donald Trump’s twitters are read by millions and discussed on television. One word from him could push Congress into laying a foundation for withdrawal after he is sworn in. Should The Donald come out for withdrawal he will be the first billionaire of either party to oppose the United Nations as far as I know.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Why was the United Nations formed?

 

[Darkwind]

Lets keep the eye on the ball here and concentrate on lifting the heavy burden of regulations from business, turning the burner up on the economy, and rewriting taxation.

Ain't nobody got time for this.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Lets keep the eye on the ball here and concentrate on lifting the heavy burden of regulations from business, turning the burner up on the economy, and rewriting taxation.

Ain't nobody got time for this.

You would like to lessen, "the heavy burden of regulations from business", a topic well worth debate and discussion, which is a clarion call within the thinking of Republican supporters. But, much as the repeal of the ACA has become, does anyone understand the consequences should such changes take place?

Many feel (an emotion) that only benefits will be the product of such administrative actions, but how many really know what is in the Federal Register and the CFR?

Check 'em out:

FindLaw: Cases and Codes: Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)

 

[Darkwind]

Lets keep the eye on the ball here and concentrate on lifting the heavy burden of regulations from business, turning the burner up on the economy, and rewriting taxation.

Ain't nobody got time for this.

You would like to lessen, "the heavy burden of regulations from business", a topic well worth debate and discussion, which is a clarion call within the thinking of Republican supporters. But, much as the repeal of the ACA has become, does anyone understand the consequences should such changes take place?

Many feel (an emotion) that only benefits will be the product of such administrative actions, but how many really know what is in the Federal Register and the CFR?

Check 'em out:

FindLaw: Cases and Codes: Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)

Yes, the consequences will be a better economy and the fearmongering of dire consequences will not occur. Though I'm sure that the democrats and their supporters will seek to find the most horrendous instances of harm they can and then pass that off as what will be the norm.

The truth is, many of the regulations that burden business in this country serves a political purpose, not a public one.

 

[Flanders]

Why was the United Nations formed?

To TheOldSchool: Short answer: A one government world administered by the United Nations.

More importantly:

In addition to the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945, the sneaks who got this country into the UN knew what they were doing when they designed a foundation that was a masterpiece of betrayal. A foundation that would withstand every challenge when their descendants carried on. Treason became legal the minute the US became a member of an underhanded organization that was, and is, determined to tear down America. Membership in the UN meant that no American official betraying this country on the UN’s behalf could be prosecuted for treason. Only lawyers could design something like that.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/congress/259446-defining-treason.html​

And if you must spout United Nations crapola in my threads at least accompany your link with your views promoting the discredited justification for the UN. Or are you too stupid to make a case for the United Nations in your own words?

 

[TheOldSchool]

Why was the United Nations formed?

To TheOldSchool: Short answer: A one government world administered by the United Nations.

More importantly:

In addition to the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945, the sneaks who got this country into the UN knew what they were doing when they designed a foundation that was a masterpiece of betrayal. A foundation that would withstand every challenge when their descendants carried on. Treason became legal the minute the US became a member of an underhanded organization that was, and is, determined to tear down America. Membership in the UN meant that no American official betraying this country on the UN’s behalf could be prosecuted for treason. Only lawyers could design something like that.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/congress/259446-defining-treason.html​

And if you must spout United Nations crapola in my threads at least accompany your link with your views promoting the discredited justification for the UN. Or are you too stupid to make a case for the United Nations in your own words?

You should have just clicked the link

 

[Flanders]

You should have just clicked the link

To TheOldSchool: I did. The answer is pure global government bullshit. The only thing missing is “prevent a nuclear war”, and that one is still up for grabs when you consider Democrats handing Iran nuclear capabilities.

 

[nick21punishment]

The truth is, many of the regulations that burden business in this country serves a political purpose, not a public one.

 

[Flanders]

Petition, legislation, put U.N. in state of 'uncertainty' over future
Posted By Bob Unruh On 01/27/2017 @ 11:27 pm

Petition, legislation, put U.N. in state of ‘uncertainty’ over future​

Incidentally, before President Trump does more kissy-kissy with Prime Minister Theresa May somebody should remind him that Great Britain also has a permanent seat on the Security Council.

The UN Resolution that issued Israel’s death warrant triggered a greater outcry than did all of the combined United Nations disgraces in the past 72 years.

Question: Did Trump ask May why her government did not veto UN Resolution 2334?

Question: Do average Brits feel the same way about the United Nations they feel about the EU? Answer: If not why not?

Britain’s Theresa May in U.S.: Islam is Peaceful, Globalism Good, Climate Change a Priority
by Raheem Kassam26 Jan 2017

Britain's Theresa May in U.S.: Islam is Peaceful, Globalist Orgs Good, Climate Change Priority​

 

[Flanders]

The possibility of Donald Trump getting the U.S. out of the United Nations was the one and only thing that put me in his camp. In general, I can put in with everything else he does except sucking up to the UNIC.

First he snuggled up to Theresa May after she said:

She hailed the United Nations, praised the World Bank, and called NATO “the cornerstone” of Western defence.

And Mrs. May also spoke of the necessity for multilateralism in stark contrast with the line pushed by the White House — which prefers bilateralism — over recent days. She cited the need to tackle “climate change” as one of the reasons to back globalist institutions.​

Britain’s Theresa May in U.S.: Islam is Peaceful, Globalism Good, Climate Change a Priority
by Raheem Kassam26 Jan 2017

Britain's Theresa May in U.S.: Islam is Peaceful, Globalist Orgs Good, Climate Change Priority​

Secondly, I did not much care for Nikki Haley before Trump made her U.S. Ambassador to the UN.

Anybody interested in learning more about how the United Nations gets into our domestic affairs you can start with South Carolina. Naturally, former SENATOR, and longtime traitor, John Kerry pops up in this article:​

Kerry sent one of his top lieutenants to Spartanburg earlier this week to try to quell the uprising.​

Nikki Haley welcomes Muslim refugees
Posted By Leo Hohmann On 08/28/2015 @ 8:23 pm

Nikki Haley welcomes Muslim refugees​

Now, Trump and Haley are making me antsy:

Bureaucrats and diplomats at the United Nations are scrambling to adjust to the new Trump administration. One thing seems certain. The Obama days of wine and roses for the UN are over. The new U.S. ambassador to the UN, Nikki Haley, told reporters on Friday, upon entering UN headquarters for the first time in her new role, “you are going to see a change in the way we do business.” She added that the Trump administration “is prepared and ready to go in – to have me go in, look at the UN, and everything that’s working, we’re going to make it better; everything that’s not working, we’re going to try and fix; and anything that seems to be obsolete and not necessary, we’re going to do away with.” For anyone whom might doubt that the Trump administration means business, Ambassador Haley made it clear that the administration would be “taking names” of “those who don’t have our back.”​

Ending Business as Usual at the United Nations
By Joseph A. Klein
January 28, 2017

Ending Business as Usual at the United Nations​

Let me cut to the chase. The media made Haley and Trump look good to Americans. In fact, she was talking about reforming the United Nations when passing H.R. 193 is the only cure for that disease.