Will Republicans refuse to certify a Harris win?

[MagicMike]

Will Kamala accept the results?... she hasn't said she will... in fact she doesn't say anything....

Sure she will; as long as everything is above board.

 

[Rambunctious]

Sure she will; as long as everything is above board.

That's all Trump is saying.... same exact thing....

 

[MagicMike]

That's all Trump is saying.... same exact thing....

So back to the original question then.
Let's say all thr recounts and court challenges confirms a winner.
The Harris campaign will accept that.
Will Trump? Because last time he didn't and sent an armed mob of insurrectionists to The Capitol to overthrow democracy.

 

[Rambunctious]

So back to the original question then.
Let's say all thr recounts and court challenges confirms a winner.
The Harris campaign will accept that.
Will Trump? Because last time he didn't and sent an armed mob of insurrectionists to The Capitol to overthrow democracy.

Over 70% of Americans now believe something was amiss in 2020... mainly due to covid rules for voting that couldn't be verified... the more time goes on the more evidence comes out of ballot errors....
This election will be very different... it won't be without problems and cheating but it won't be enough to change the will of the people....

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

That opportunistic KumWhore is going to lose.

 

[MagicMike]

Over 70% of Americans now believe something was amiss in 2020... mainly due to covid rules for voting that couldn't be verified...

the more time goes on the more evidence comes out of ballot errors....

This election will be very different... it won't be without problems and cheating but it won't be enough to change the will of the people....

Good. So when Harris wins you will be the first one on this board saying that the "will of the people" prevailed right?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Harris will accept the results. If Trump does not, he goes to jail.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Over 70% of Americans now believe something was amiss in 2020... mainly due to covid rules for voting that couldn't be verified... the more time goes on the more evidence comes out of ballot errors....
This election will be very different... it won't be without problems and cheating but it won't be enough to change the will of the people....

It's 30% and dropping, and they are all MAGA slumphfs.

 

[Darkwind]

So if say....over 60 federal court cases alledging "voter fraud" are thrown out of court for lack of any actual evidence of voter fraud (like in 2020), and if hand recounts in challenged precincts also showed zero evidence of voter fraud (like in 2020) would THAT be enough to assure you that everything is "above board?"

Trump keeps using this same cop out when asked if he will accept the election results, so the question should be what PROOF do you need in the week(s) following November 5th to assure you the election results are valud?

No voter fraud was tossed out of court for lack of evidence. You should learn that first.

The courts refused to hear the cases on technicalities of procedure, not evidence.

We don't know that hand counts showed zero evidence because recounts were done in secret, without proper oversight.

Ask yourself this. Will Harris accept the results and not demand more? Just accept it at the end of the night?

 

[bendog]

No they won't. Although 270 votes may be certified for Harris despite Maga.

 

[MagicMike]

No voter fraud was tossed out of court for lack of evidence. You should learn that first.

Wrong. Trump's legal team could not produce one shred of actual evidence.
I recognize the cult kool aid you have obviously been drinking though.
Your cult tried trotting this "thrown out on procedural/discovery grounds" bullshit two years ago. That claim has since been debunked.
You should try a little harder to keep up with your cult's most current official talking points.
They change pretty quickly because when you're just throwing shit at the wall not everything sticks you know.

The courts refused to hear the cases on technicalities of procedure, not evidence.

Again, fake news.
No credible evidence of election fraud; credible being the operative word.
This is why convicted felon Trump's sideshow-freak attorneys like Guilliani and Powell received such harsh sanctions & reprimands....for abusing the legal system with bullshit, spurious, non-serious filings.

We don't know that hand counts showed zero evidence because recounts were done in secret, without proper oversight.

Totally fake news. Again, if you want to swallow your cult kool aid on your own that's your business but you shouldn't try to shove your whacko conspiracy-minded bullshit down the throats of others.
You MAGAt cultroach, election deniers look ridiculous to others.
MOST people don't take it seriously. Only you MAGAt fringe freaks....and you are not enough to sway elections anymore. 2016 was your one shot. Now you (and your wingnut ideas) are a minority.
Get used to it.

Ask yourself this. Will Harris accept the results and not demand more? Just accept it at the end of the night?

If all the vote totals are in by the end of the night (which probably won't be the case) and there are aren't any contests/challenges by MAGAt election officials in swing state precincts then yes. She most likely will.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

No voter fraud was tossed out of court for lack of evidence. You should learn that first.

The courts refused to hear the cases on technicalities of procedure, not evidence.

We don't know that hand counts showed zero evidence because recounts were done in secret, without proper oversight.

Ask yourself this. Will Harris accept the results and not demand more? Just accept it at the end of the night?

No court case went forward. Why? Lack of evidence.

 

[lafayette]

MAGA had no evidence.

 

[Darkwind]

Wrong. Trump's legal team could not produce one shred of actual evidence.
I recognize the cult kool aid you have obviously been drinking though.
Your cult tried trotting this "thrown out on procedural/discovery grounds" bullshit two years ago. That claim has since been debunked.
You should try a little harder to keep up with your cult's most current official talking points.
They change pretty quickly because when you're just throwing shit at the wall not everything sticks you know.

Again, fake news.
No credible evidence of election fraud; credible being the operative word.
This is why convicted felon Trump's sideshow-freak attorneys like Guilliani and Powell received such harsh sanctions & reprimands....for abusing the legal system with bullshit, spurious, non-serious filings.

Totally fake news. Again, if you want to swallow your cult kool aid on your own that's your business but you shouldn't try to shove your whacko conspiracy-minded bullshit down the throats of others.
You MAGAt cultroach, election deniers look ridiculous to others.
MOST people don't take it seriously. Only you MAGAt fringe freaks....and you are not enough to sway elections anymore. 2016 was your one shot. Now you (and your wingnut ideas) are a minority.
Get used to it.

If all the vote totals are in by the end of the night (which probably won't be the case) and there are aren't any contests/challenges by MAGAt election officials in swing state precincts then yes. She most likely will.

You're just wrong. But then, who the fuck cares what you think anyway?

 

[BluesLegend]

Will Republicans refuse to certify a Harris win?​

Until Democrats stop rigging, cheating and stealing elections then yes and Dems can go F themselves if they don't like it.

 

[lafayette]

MAGA don't matter.

It justs gets turned around and bent over, and then we go about our way.

 

[JoeMoma]

The irony is that your man Trump said the VP does not have to certify the election. Don't worry Democrats are not loser crybabies like MAGAs.

Why even have that the VP certify the election if he has no authority to hold up on the certification in consideration of special circumstances. I am not saying that Pence should have held off on certifying the election, but I do believe people have the right to voice their opinions that he should have done so.

 

[Catsnmeters]

That was the DemoKKKrat strategy in 2016. When it didn't work, you rioted and threw firebombs at the White House.

Sounds like a Republikkkan lie.

I don't remember convictions of throwing a firebomb or related charge at the White House.

I do remember seditious conspiracy in 2021 though.

Are you maybe confusing that with your claim?

 

[lafayette]

KH knows what to do with MAGA interference.

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

Nobody wants that SLUT KumWhore except a few disillusioned brainwashed Democrats.