Will P. M. Mark Carney leave the Liberals with fewer M. P's than Mr. Ignatieff did?

[DennisPTate]

Will P. M. Mark Carney leave Canada's Liberal Party with fewer remaining M. P's than Mr. Michael Ignatieff did?

I actually joined Canada's Liberal Party in 2009 after I heard Mr. Ignatieff give a compliment to Prime Minister Stephen Harper for "tabling a relatively "Liberal" budget."

That is the only approach to politics that I personally could take so I joined the Liberals. The fact that at that time it was almost impossible to have an intelligent discussion about Climate Change with Conservatives, left me with little real alternative anyway.



"In my opinion as somebody who actually attempted to rival Mr. Justin Trudeau for the office of National Leader of Canada's Liberal Party back in 2011 I have gotten the impression that P. M. Mark Carney is headed toward leaving the Liberal Party in even worse condition than Mr. Michael Ignatieff did?

I joined the Liberal Party early in 2009 because I wanted to promote an alternative theory on stabilization of the climate through deliberately turning deserts green. I also wanted to expose and apologize for the massive error that Prime Minister Pierre E. Trudeau made back in 1974 that caused the national debt of Canada to spiral out of control!

I left the Liberal Party in 2015 after it became apparent that a Pro-Life Liberal who would promote a "Ban on Intra-cardiac Potassium Chloride Injections on Singletons" was not wanted in Trudeau's Liberal Party."

Post in thread 'Was the Trump speech to World Economic Forum one of his best ever?'

Jan 25, 2026

Yeah, but Trump won't let Carney be part of the cool kids Peace Club!

So take THAT, Canada!

In my opinion as somebody who actually attempted to rival Mr. Justin Trudeau for the office of National Leader of Canada's Liberal Party back in 2011 I have gotten the impression that P. M. Mark Carney is headed toward leaving the Liberal Party in even worse condition than Mr. Michael Ignatieff did?

I joined the Liberal Party early in 2009 because I wanted to promote an alternative theory on stabilization of the climate through deliberately turning deserts green. I also...

• DennisPTate

• 
• 

"Was the Trump speech to World Economic Forum one of his best ever?"​

On a positive note there is a saying: "A film devoid of conflict is boring" [R. W. told me this one back in 2010]

P. M. Mark Carney is absolutely making Canadian and USA political much more interesting by increasing the tensions between Canada and the USA during the Trump administration!

 

[DennisPTate]

Prime Minister Mark Carney has done a pretty good job of showing all Canadians what will happen if Canada's P. M. goes all out against President Trump on everything that he decides to do.

In a way, that is at least something of a positive because it could be said that forty one million Canadians needed to know and better understand our options?

Post in thread 'Davos has pivoted from CLIMATE CHANGE to CRYPTO AND AI'

Jan 25, 2026

They want a global tax. One that we are aware of to get us used to world government. If for the poor I get it. However, we see here in our nation how people do not want to pay for anything. Progs through their propaganda or truth as an example skewer tariffs. The same people who want to pay for the people of color around the planet without them personally paying.

Wow!!!!!!!!!!

The thought has been crossing my mind that here in Canada there is a way to turn the Trump Tariffs into a positive.

We could have intellectually honest M. P's who decide to use the Bank of Canada as it...

• DennisPTate

• 

Davos has pivoted from CLIMATE CHANGE to CRYPTO AND AI​

......
" The thought has been crossing my mind that here in Canada there is a way to turn the Trump Tariffs into a positive.

We could have intellectually honest M. P's who decide to use the Bank of Canada as it was used from 1938 to 1974 in such a way that Canada's Federal government ASSISTS Canadian companies with the costs of the Tariffs?

It would have to be in the form of a LOAN though.....
not a grant.....
and that could actually work!

We need to know about the colossal error made by then Prime Minister Pierre E. Trudeau though!

HOW PIERRE TRUDEAU TURNED US INTO DEBT SLAVES
Click on the link above to watch Part 3 of my video series on the Canadian Banking System. Please also read accompanying text below.
Trudeaumania was just gearing up when I immigrated to Canada in late 1966. I, too, was impressed with Trudeau. He was intelligent, articulate, with liberal ideas. And as Prime Minister, Trudeau repatriated the Canadian Constitution and told the morals’ police to stay out of people’s bedrooms. But then…but then. As Anthony’s famous speech in Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar reminds us… “the evil that men do live after them while the good is often interred with their bones. So let it be with Caesar.”

But somehow this worked backward for Trudeau. Many Canadians still think highly of Pierre Trudeau, but in 1974 he did one terrible thing that changed the lives, for present and future, of all Canadians, for the worse. Trudeau gave the leading operations of the Bank of Canada over to the private banks operating in Canada.

The Bank of Canada was first established by Prime Minister Richard Bennet in 1935 as a private central bank, but was then nationalized by William Lyon Mackenzie King in 1938. By nationalizing the bank, Mackenzie King meant for it to belong to the people so the Canadian government could borrow funds with little or no interest for capital expenditures. The mandate of the newly nationalized Bank of Canada was to act as the banker to the government and to manage the public debt. As Mackenzie King famously said: “Once a nation parts with the control of their currency and credit, it matters not who makes that nation’s laws. Usury, once in control, will wreck any nation. Until the control of the issue of currency and credit is restored to government and recognized as its most sacred responsibility, all talk of sovereignty of parliament and of democracy is idle and futile.”

So the Bank of Canada was nationalized in 1938 and the government could now borrow money with little or no interest. And it worked. The Canadian government built freeways, public transportation systems, subway line, airports, the St. Lawrence Seaway and funded a national health care system and the Canada Pension Plan. But then Trudeau, under the influence of the international financial group called Basel’s
Committee’s Recommendations (The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision) made the decision to halt the borrowing of money from the Bank of Canada, and instead, chose to borrow from the private banks who instead of lending to the government at no interest, or low interest, introduced higher interest rates along with compound interest.

All banks know very well the magic of compound interest. And Pierre Trudeau must have known that the mounting compounded national debt would lead to Canadians eventually owing a dollar fifty for every dollar of their disposable incomes. After all, he studied economics at the London School of Economics. Surely the professors there knew about compound interest.

So Pierre Trudeau, instead of feeling blessed that Canada, unlike the US, had a nationalized central bank, signed our bank away to the private banks. Couldn’t Trudeau, such an educated man, surmise that citizens in a few years would be struggling to make car payments and meet rent and mortgages and student loans and to buy healthy food while last year’s profits for the big five (that’s Royal Bank, TD Bank, Scotiabank, Bank of Montreal and CIBC amounted to $31.7 billion?) If he did, he didn’t care. But it doesn’t have to be this way. It really doesn’t. Our Bank of
Canada is still there. Next time." (Ms. Betty Krawczyk)

Yes, I admit that there were other factors involved, [such a OPEC], but here is the result of the of P. M. Pierre E. Trudeau's very serious error in 1974.

The national debt of Canada spiralled out of control.

I could be incorrect about this.....
but it seems to me that some astonishingly Intelligent, [but not necessarily Ethical], people set this up so that what happened to the national debt of Canada would be the same as what was being done in the USA. A broken "hockey stick shaped graph" on the national debt of Canada would have alarmed some sleeping American thinkers, and BigBanking officials did NOT want that to happen!

OR WOULD IT BE FAR, FAR, FAR BETTER FOR PREMIER Doug Ford TO ACCOMPLISH THIS WITH THE PROPOSED "407 DOLLARS?"

Should Premier Doug Ford of Ontario introduce "407 Dollars" similar to Calgary Dollars?​

Thread 'Should Premier Doug Ford of Ontario introduce "407 Dollars" similar to Calgary Dollars?'

Jan 17, 2026

www.CalgaryDollars.ca/

Several years ago you could earn Calgary Dollars and use them to pay a set percentage of your property taxes.

If I remember correctly it may been up to ten percent of your property taxes?

407 ETR crews prepared to keep the GTA moving safely this winter​

When winter hits, our Highway Operations team is ready to clear Highway 407 ETR fast. With wide wing plows that clear two lanes at once, salt trucks deployed in under 25 minutes, and advanced brine systems preventing black ice, we keep the highway moving — even in the toughest conditions.Watch how...

• DennisPTate
• Replies: 5
• Forum: Canada

 

[DennisPTate]

The Great One, The Wayne Gretzky should begin researching the option of taking over Canada's Liberal Party just in case the P. M. Mark Carney gambits and initiatives bacfire, much as the Michael Ignatieff initiatives backfired politically. [For the record I personally joined the Liberal Party early in 2009 when I heard Mr. Michael Ignatieff give Prime Minister Stephen Harper some credit for "tabling a relatively "Liberal" budget."
I like that type of approach to politics, but it can be dangerous.