Will Don Lemon go to jail ?

[Robert W]

Nowhere in the indictment does it say he organized anything. Knowing what would happen does not make one an organizer or legally responsible for their actions.

He joined them to document it as a journalist, an activity which is protected by the first amendment.

This journalist cleared Ashli Babbitt.

 

[protectionist]

Anther dodge! Protectionst doesn't predict the outcome of the case. Instead, he tells us what he as a message board nickname personally thinks about it.
Dodger.

Oh, but I DID predict the outcome of the case. I not only predicted it, but I predicted it in DETAIL, with 2 possible scenarios.

Yes, if he gets an honest objective jury & judge.

No, if he gets a judge & jury full of liberals, who don't care one iota if he's guilty or not.

 

[Marener]

He was part of the intrusion.

Please stop making a complte idiot out of yourself, by talking about "journalist". That was buried in this thread hundreds of posts ago.

“Intrusion” is loaded language and not a crime.

It’s a public space, anyone can walk in. Relabeling it as an “intrusion” is not part of the law.

 

[meaner gene]

He was part of the intrusion.

Please stop making a complte idiot out of yourself, by talking about "journalist". That was buried in this thread hundreds of posts ago.

Let me get this straight. The other intruders were yelling at the minister, but Lemmon didn't yell anything to anyone.

The intruders blocked people from freely moving in and out of the church, but all Lemmon did was stop people in order to ask them questions. They were free to ignore him, and he did not try to prevent them from leaving.

 

[konradv]

The First Amendment simply means the government cannot infringe your right to free speech. It does NOT mean you can interrupt a church service.

He wasn’t. He was reporting on 5hose who were.

 

[Robert W]

Saw them all, but none of them address the issue.

All you've done is provided a quote from Don Lemon, which is not a crime.

What's telling here is that you are unable to describe his actions which actually constitute the crime. You are told to believe Don Lemon is guilty, so that's what you believe.

You don't think for yourself.

The Judge would have dismissed Lemon from the charges were you correct.

 

[Robert W]

Let me get this straight. The other intruders were yelling at the minister, but Lemmon didn't yell anything to anyone.

The intruders blocked people from freely moving in and out of the church, but all Lemmon did was stop people in order to ask them questions. They were free to ignore him, and he did not try to prevent them from leaving.

I am sure Lemon's attorney said that. The judge did not buy your claim.

 

[konradv]

Yeah ? So where the "report" ? Nobody seems to have seen it.

Willful blindness! He reports online regularly.

 

[meaner gene]

Here is a reporter that day who cleared Ashli Babbitt.

You're actually destroying his argument that Lemmon should have stayed outside of the church.

Thanks.

 

[protectionist]

“Intrusion” is loaded language and not a crime.

It’s a public space, anyone can walk in. Relabeling it as an “intrusion” is not part of the law.

FALSE! An intrusion is a disruption which is conspiring to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution. (US code 18-241)

Exactly what these morons did in that church.
Plus the FACE Act - intimidate or interfere with any person lawfully exercising or seeking to exercise the First Amendment right of religious freedom at a place of religious worship; (Us Code 18-248)

Ho hum. Lock him up.

 

[Robert W]

“Intrusion” is loaded language and not a crime.

It’s a public space, anyone can walk in. Relabeling it as an “intrusion” is not part of the law.

Lemon one would think hired lawyers making your arguments. But the judge did not buy it. Lemon will more than likely face a trial.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

You're actually destroying his argument that Lemmon should have stayed outside of the church.

Thanks.

Lemon was there for one reason, trying to be realvant and showing his ass. Nothing more and nothing less

 

[Marener]

The Judge would have dismissed Lemon from the charges were you correct.

Pretrial motions are just getting started. There’s plenty of time for charges to be dismissed.

 

[protectionist]

Willful blindness! He reports online regularly.

Yeah ?... and you call that "journalism" huh ? We're reporting online right now. Are we journalists ?

 

[Robert W]

FALSE! An intrusion is a disruption which is conspiring to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution. (US code 18-241)

Exactly what these morons did in that church.
Plus the FACE Act - intimidate or interfere with any person lawfully exercising or seeking to exercise the First Amendment right of religious freedom at a place of religious worship; (Us Code 18-248)

Ho hum. Lock him up.

I am sure that Don Lemons attorneys tried the same trick our opponents are trying. The judge said no way.

 

[Marener]

Lemon one would think hired lawyers making your arguments. But the judge did not buy it. Lemon will more than likely face a trial.

What do you mean “the judge did not buy it”? This is just getting started.

 

[protectionist]

Pretrial motions are just getting started. There’s plenty of time for charges to be dismissed.

Or escalated.

 

[Robert W]

Yeah ?... and you call that "journalism" huh ? We're reporting online right now. Are we journalists ?

This is a demonstration of why talking to left wingers makes no sense. We did not decide to arrest Lemon, and we are not the judge who rejected those arguments made by the left.

 

[Marener]

FALSE! An intrusion is a disruption which is conspiring to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution. (US code 18-241)

Exactly what these morons did in that church.
Plus the FACE Act - intimidate or interfere with any person lawfully exercising or seeking to exercise the First Amendment right of religious freedom at a place of religious worship; (Us Code 18-248)

Ho hum. Lock him up.

Explain how Lemon threatened, intimidated or did anything else in the statute.

 

[meaner gene]

I am sure Lemon's attorney said that. The judge did not buy your claim.

Actually the judge has to give the DOJ great deference to their descriptions.
We saw it many times, where later evidence caused them to take back their descriptions and had the judge drop the charges.

In a significant reversal, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) asked a federal judge to dismiss felony assault charges against two Venezuelan men in Minnesota, following evidence that suggested Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents lied about a January 2026 shooting.