Cecilie1200
Diamond Member
Newt is the one with crimes under his belt.
why do you pretend?
Really? What crimes would those be? Be specific, and include proof.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Newt is the one with crimes under his belt.
why do you pretend?
Newt is the one with crimes under his belt.
why do you pretend?
Really? What crimes would those be? Be specific, and include proof.
Gotta laugh.
Newts doing well in the polls so Pelosi, that icon of upright ethical behavior, is gonna dig through decades old "stuff" to try to sink him?? The same Pelosi who as Speaker tried her dmandest to give Wrangle a pass?? That Pelosi??
Wonder how Pelosi would survive an investigation into the insider trading fiasco currently brewing in Congress??
Rangle deserved a pass.
That was a witch hunt.
Actually, I think the hunt was more over tax evasion than being a witch
Newt is the one with crimes under his belt.
why do you pretend?
Really? What crimes would those be? Be specific, and include proof.
I didnt ask that.
Personallyt, I want to know what dirt Pelosi has on Newt. I like to make educated decisions when voting.
But I am a bit disturbed that Pelosi hgeld back information for over 15 years now and decided to use that informatyion for party advantage.
When are we all going to realize that our congress is playing with us....we are their empoloyers...and everydqay we are seeing how they hide crap from us...and then ask us to "trust them"...
Doesnt that bother you?
It does me...thats for sure.
I look at it differently
Newt had his hearing, was punished and went into private life as a political commentator. I think he has an expectation of privacy because it is not really relevant to his job
However, I find it highly relevant to being elected president and I think Newt is acting like a criminal by hiding behind House Confidentiality rules
I dont disagree.
Newt has been my choice since the primary campaigns began.
Now I want to hear mnore about his past.
But I still question why a congressperson feels she has the right to hide this info 15 years ago and not release it until she can gain from it.
To me? That in itself is an ethics violation.
I look at it differently
Newt had his hearing, was punished and went into private life as a political commentator. I think he has an expectation of privacy because it is not really relevant to his job
However, I find it highly relevant to being elected president and I think Newt is acting like a criminal by hiding behind House Confidentiality rules
I dont disagree.
Newt has been my choice since the primary campaigns began.
Now I want to hear mnore about his past.
But I still question why a congressperson feels she has the right to hide this info 15 years ago and not release it until she can gain from it.
To me? That in itself is an ethics violation.
I have no doubt that Pelosi is timing this for it's political punch. I would prefer that she not be the one to release this information. If she does, I think she should face any consequences
But it scares me that Newt is acting like a criminal in demanding his confidentiality rights. He may have the right to remain silent, but that does not make him appear innocent
If this event in his life is significant enough to cause him to resign from Congress, I think the voters should know the details and decide if it is still relevant
he broke the laws and lied to the investigators.
He is guilty
You would think people would want to know what they were voting for. The same people have looney transvestites chasing down Obama's kindergarten records but they are seemingly disinterested in ethics violations by a man running to be their presidential nominee, lord help us.
LOL The phoney outrage is so yesterday.
Let me know when newt is responsible for killing americans like many democrats are.
Why dont you go tell the murdered mans wife it was for a greater cause in eliminating the second.
asswipe.
OK that made little sense, now why don't you want to know what Newt did before you vote for him?
Wednesday, January 22 1997; Page A01
The House voted overwhelmingly yesterday to reprimand House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) and order him to pay an unprecedented $300,000 penalty, the first time in the House's 208-year history it has disciplined a speaker for ethical wrongdoing.
The ethics case and its resolution leave Gingrich with little leeway for future personal controversies, House Republicans said. Exactly one month before yesterday's vote, Gingrich admitted that he brought discredit to the House and broke its rules by failing to ensure that financing for two projects would not violate federal tax law and by giving the House ethics committee false information.
BBM...
A man who admits his mistakes has a lesser chance of repeating them than a presidemt who blames all others for the mistakes he has made and affected the country.
Forgive and forget? Bullshit.
Did Newt personally profit from his violations or were they just mistakes?
I dont disagree.
Newt has been my choice since the primary campaigns began.
Now I want to hear mnore about his past.
But I still question why a congressperson feels she has the right to hide this info 15 years ago and not release it until she can gain from it.
To me? That in itself is an ethics violation.
I have no doubt that Pelosi is timing this for it's political punch. I would prefer that she not be the one to release this information. If she does, I think she should face any consequences
But it scares me that Newt is acting like a criminal in demanding his confidentiality rights. He may have the right to remain silent, but that does not make him appear innocent
If this event in his life is significant enough to cause him to resign from Congress, I think the voters should know the details and decide if it is still relevant
Dont you get it RW?
She does not need to release the information...and as the former speaker, she knows she cant.
And your attitude is exactly why she idd it the way she did it.....now people see Newt as hiding something.
He has an uphill battle...and he eartned it with his ethics violation..
But in the meantime, we have a house minority leader, former speaker, possibly future speaker who played a political game for political expediency with information that she gathered while on the peoples payroll.
Such would result in termination of that employee in the private sector..and rightfully so.
Curious...does it nbot concern you that she may have as much damning information on some of our other law makers that are part of the demoicratic party and uses it to force their hands when it comes to legislation?
In my eyes, she has proven to not be trusted.
And if Newt does not come clean, he could also not be trusted.
But she is still writing our laws....he is not.
Newt is the one with crimes under his belt.
why do you pretend?
Really? What crimes would those be? Be specific, and include proof.
She doesn't know.
I have no doubt that Pelosi is timing this for it's political punch. I would prefer that she not be the one to release this information. If she does, I think she should face any consequences
But it scares me that Newt is acting like a criminal in demanding his confidentiality rights. He may have the right to remain silent, but that does not make him appear innocent
If this event in his life is significant enough to cause him to resign from Congress, I think the voters should know the details and decide if it is still relevant
Dont you get it RW?
She does not need to release the information...and as the former speaker, she knows she cant.
And your attitude is exactly why she idd it the way she did it.....now people see Newt as hiding something.
He has an uphill battle...and he eartned it with his ethics violation..
But in the meantime, we have a house minority leader, former speaker, possibly future speaker who played a political game for political expediency with information that she gathered while on the peoples payroll.
Such would result in termination of that employee in the private sector..and rightfully so.
Curious...does it nbot concern you that she may have as much damning information on some of our other law makers that are part of the demoicratic party and uses it to force their hands when it comes to legislation?
In my eyes, she has proven to not be trusted.
And if Newt does not come clean, he could also not be trusted.
But she is still writing our laws....he is not.
Newts ethical violations will now become the 800 lb gorilla in the room. The more Newt tries to say he has confidentiality protections, the more guilty he will seem
Newt can run, but he can't hide. The more he declines comment, the more people will use their imaginations about what really happened
His ethics file will be released one way or another.....and Pelosi got the ball rolling
It is a crime to misuse campaign money.
Newt admitted the crime