Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales criticized the "Gaza Genocide[sic]" article on Wikipedia

Pastelli

Platinum Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2023
Messages
5,246
Reaction score
3,389
Points
938
Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales criticized the "Gaza Genocide[sic]" article on Wikipedia for failing to meet neutrality standards, calling it an "egregious example" needing immediate attention. Speaking personally (not for the Wikimedia Foundation), he highlighted that the article states in Wikipedia's voice that Israel is committing a supposed so-called genocide—a highly contested claim. The current lead asserts: “the Gaza genocide[sic] is the ongoing, intentional, and systematic destruction of the Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip carried out by Israel during the Gaza war.” Wales urged editors to revise it to reflect balanced attribution, e.g., “multiple governments, NGOs, and legal bodies have described or rejected the characterization of Israel’s actions in Gaza as genocide.” He emphasized using high-quality sources from all sides, avoiding unattributed legal conclusions, and maintaining impartiality across contentious topics.
He also said: “As many of you will know, I have been leading an NPOV (neutral point of view) working group and studying the issue of neutrality in Wikipedia across many articles and topic areas, including ‘Zionism.’”

Source:


'Wikipedia's 'Gaza Genocide' article an example of how neutrality needs to be improved, founder says'.
Jimmy Wales warned the "Gaza Genocide" article needed immediate attention, as it "failed to meet the neutrality standards of Wikipedia."
By Michael Starr, 'Jerusalem Post', November 3, 2025.

About the "genocide" lie...

_________



Where has he been?

It's an old long time problem

Wikipedia is controlled by COORDINATED BIGOTS GROUP of dozens of editors working in order, when it comes to anything related to Israel.



In addition, for example, that page he refers to, relies on infamous GOEBBELS-dubbed Francesca Albanese, Haaretz and al Jazeera. The first problem by Wikipedia regarding this stuff is that the organized lobby decides what is a RS "reliable source".


  • Project Wikipedia
  • This is from lefty (anti Israel Arab lobbyist controlled) biased Wikipedia. Explained: Wikipedia editors are demonising Israel, promoting Hamas and Hezbollah propaganda in targeted manner
  • Anti-Israel club at Wikipedia working for years in cahoots (such as Hamas-nick Nableezy, the bigot Nishidani[2] [[3]]), shielded by a prolific adminstrator (Zero0000) [4] [[5]].

    Not including Euro- Med founded by Ramy Abdu - Hamas lobbyist [6] [[7]], the other club: ‘Ivana and Samer_BHH, the two people who praised Wikipedia editors’ handling of the ADL, are active members of “Tech for Palestine.’ [8] [[9]]

    Wikipedia “palestine” Islamist editor ‘[10] ‘Iskandar323’ behind push to [11] [[12]] ban ADL - the "nakba" page denial page creator, has been defending al Jazeera: On June 19, 2024 he argued: “On Nuseirat, why are we trusting the NYT over AJ?” [13] [[14]] [15] [[16]]

    'Concern, dismay’ by Wikipedia attack on ADL, 43 Jewish groups tell Wikimedia Foundation. “Fundamentally, Wikipedia is stripping the Jewish community of the right to defend itself from the hatred that targets our community,” the groups wrote. JNS [[17]]
  • Exposing Wikipedia (March 2025) organized Arab lobby of over 30...


 
Last edited:
People throw around terms like "genocide" or "fascist" whenever they don't want to discuss real solutions to real problems.
 
1000007084.webp
1000007083.webp
1000007082.webp
1000007081.webp
1000007080.webp
1000007079.webp
1000007078.webp
1000007077.webp
1000007076.webp
 
Who Does Wikipedia Consider a ‘Reliable Source’ on Israel-Palestine?
Three of the site's pseudonymous editors have decided the Anti-Defamation League can't be trusted; meanwhile, Al Jazeera is uncritically cited.

“On the page for the October 7 attacks,” writes Julia Steinberg, “Wikipedia absolves Hamas of its antisemitism.” (Illustration by The Free Press, screenshots via Wikimedia)
By Julia Steinberg
06.27.24 —
Culture and Ideas
 
People throw around terms like "genocide" or "fascist" whenever they don't want to discuss real solutions to real problems.
This specific slur "genocide" (of 33,000 civilian Gazans killed when 25,000 islamic Hamas regime used them as human shields) is designed to anything but as a slur and diminishing the WW2 unique calamity.
It doesn't matter if one or 2 professors decide to "agree" (with it when seeing photos of kids with diseases unrelated to food shortages) . At the core, that's what it was always about and not related to caring about any lives.
 
A contested claim? It is not contested, there is no and has never been an attempt to exterminate all arabs by anyone at anytime.

Not unless you are speaking of arab trieb against arab tribe, then yes that is genocide.

Or if you are talking about arab state vs arab state then there is a genocide

And if you speak of moslem religious sect vs moslem religious sect then there is a genocide

AND if you were talking about chicago this weekend where black people killed more people than got killed in gaza this weekend, than yes, genocide
 
A contested claim? It is not contested, there is no and has never been an attempt to exterminate all arabs by anyone at anytime.

Not unless you are speaking of arab trieb against arab tribe, then yes that is genocide.

Or if you are talking about arab state vs arab state then there is a genocide

And if you speak of moslem religious sect vs moslem religious sect then there is a genocide

AND if you were talking about chicago this weekend where black people killed more people than got killed in gaza this weekend, than yes, genocide
"Genocide/aparheid" are just Pallyweid Buzzwords with zero facts.
The fact that all those who promoted the "apartheid" slur automatically promote the "genocide" lie tells you all you need to know about both.

standwithus.
Nov 1, 2025.
Nelson Mandela's granddaughters saw the truth for themselves in Israel, there is no apartheid.

EyO37TkXrzGCyMnZhuYJpzKxAtn4Y-7VP_fnKzt00UWDLzxxapzOUlirgkCLPG03UVDuk0PjxBcung=s1080-rw-nd-v1
 
Last edited:
"Genocide/aparheid" are just Pallyweid Buzzwords with zero facts.
The fact that all those who promoted the "apartheid" slur automatically promote the "genocide" lie tells you all you need to know about both.
Apartheid, south Africa had free education and medical that was great. After they kicked the british out the education and medical got destroyed.
 
Yes I agree.

I will use wiki to look up chemicals and elements. Sometimes for dates and stuff. Anything much else is political propaganda
Right. But on anything related to Israel I ask AI (chatgpt or grok) specifically: "avoid Wikipedia"
 
People on this message board actually use Wikipedia as a source.
 
15th post
Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales criticized the "Gaza Genocide[sic]" article on Wikipedia for failing to meet neutrality standards, calling it an "egregious example" needing immediate attention. Speaking personally (not for the Wikimedia Foundation), he highlighted that the article states in Wikipedia's voice that Israel is committing a supposed so-called genocide—a highly contested claim. The current lead asserts: “the Gaza genocide[sic] is the ongoing, intentional, and systematic destruction of the Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip carried out by Israel during the Gaza war.” Wales urged editors to revise it to reflect balanced attribution, e.g., “multiple governments, NGOs, and legal bodies have described or rejected the characterization of Israel’s actions in Gaza as genocide.” He emphasized using high-quality sources from all sides, avoiding unattributed legal conclusions, and maintaining impartiality across contentious topics.
He also said: “As many of you will know, I have been leading an NPOV (neutral point of view) working group and studying the issue of neutrality in Wikipedia across many articles and topic areas, including ‘Zionism.’”

Source:


'Wikipedia's 'Gaza Genocide' article an example of how neutrality needs to be improved, founder says'.
Jimmy Wales warned the "Gaza Genocide" article needed immediate attention, as it "failed to meet the neutrality standards of Wikipedia."
By Michael Starr, 'Jerusalem Post', November 3, 2025.

About the "genocide" lie...

_________



Where has he been?

It's an old long time problem

Wikipedia is controlled by COORDINATED BIGOTS GROUP of dozens of editors working in order, when it comes to anything related to Israel.



In addition, for example, that page he refers to, relies on infamous GOEBBELS-dubbed Francesca Albanese, Haaretz and al Jazeera. The first problem by Wikipedia regarding this stuff is that the organized lobby decides what is a RS "reliable source".


  • Project Wikipedia
  • This is from lefty (anti Israel Arab lobbyist controlled) biased Wikipedia. Explained: Wikipedia editors are demonising Israel, promoting Hamas and Hezbollah propaganda in targeted manner
  • Anti-Israel club at Wikipedia working for years in cahoots (such as Hamas-nick Nableezy, the bigot Nishidani[2] [[3]]), shielded by a prolific adminstrator (Zero0000) [4] [[5]].

    Not including Euro- Med founded by Ramy Abdu - Hamas lobbyist [6] [[7]], the other club: ‘Ivana and Samer_BHH, the two people who praised Wikipedia editors’ handling of the ADL, are active members of “Tech for Palestine.’ [8] [[9]]

    Wikipedia “palestine” Islamist editor ‘[10] ‘Iskandar323’ behind push to [11] [[12]] ban ADL - the "nakba" page denial page creator, has been defending al Jazeera: On June 19, 2024 he argued: “On Nuseirat, why are we trusting the NYT over AJ?” [13] [[14]] [15] [[16]]

    'Concern, dismay’ by Wikipedia attack on ADL, 43 Jewish groups tell Wikimedia Foundation. “Fundamentally, Wikipedia is stripping the Jewish community of the right to defend itself from the hatred that targets our community,” the groups wrote. JNS [[17]]
  • Exposing Wikipedia (March 2025) organized Arab lobby of over 30...


What's your definition of genocide?

Does it include any of the following elements?

"The genocidal acts include mass killings, starvation, infliction of serious bodily and mental harm, and preventing births.

"Other acts include blockading, destroying civilian infrastructure, destroying healthcare facilities, killing healthcare workers and aid-seekers, causing mass forced displacement, committing sexual violence, and destroying educational, religious, and cultural sites."

Gaza genocide - Wikipedia
 
GOLIATH ARAB ISLAMIC LOBBY DIRTY MONEY

Qatar has spent nearly $100 billion to buy influence in the U.S.—in Congress, universities, media outlets, think tanks, and corporations...
 
I'm still searching if you posted anything on real genocides, by Islam of course, including in Africa, Asia. Shame on you.
Perhaps you should be looking for another example of where US taxpayers are paying for 60% of the bombs, shells, and bullets any other genocide perpetrator is receiving?

I'll repeat my question:

What's your definition of genocide?

Gaza genocide - Wikipedia

"The Gaza genocide is the ongoing, intentional, and systematic destruction of the Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip carried out by Israel during the Gaza war.

"The genocide has been recognised by a United Nations special committee and commission of inquiry, the International Association of Genocide Scholars, multiple human rights groups, numerous genocide studies and international law scholars, and other experts."
 
Back
Top Bottom