I have offered you so much that I have been told I offered you to much
you said it was irrefutable
I said prove it and you cannot
You have an issue with the war in Iraq, that is your right
you post why
I have gave you links to dispute your whys and you do not like it
Mr Smith, it is time to own up to the fact that there are 2 sides to every story, denial is not a river in Egypt
You do realize that you have already responded to this post previously and I have already responded to your response don't you??
If you can't follow the thread how can anyone take your spin on how you claim things went in this thread seriously??
Furthermore, IF you claim I said something please PROVE that I actually said it instead of merely claiming that I did.
It's obvious that you don't have a clue as to what is going on so it would be best for you IF you would take the time and actually look at and read what I actually said then post what i actually said following or preceding what you think I said.
Apparently, that is about the only way for you to figure out that what you believe I said does not match what I actually said.
Was this thread about the war in Iraq?
I ask a simple question and as a typical liberal event we ended up here
It is never about the issue
its all ways about the spin
I have had enough Mr Smith
I ask you to prove any item i have shared with you to be un true
for example
This is straight from the DOD
The main stream media as well as you ignore this
this is a game breaker
Saddam stated these items had been destroyed
Defense.gov News Article: Munitions Found in Iraq Meet WMD Criteria, Official Says
WASHINGTON, June 29, 2006 – The 500 munitions discovered throughout Iraq since 2003 and discussed in a National Ground Intelligence Center report meet the criteria of weapons of mass destruction, the center's commander said here today.
"These are chemical weapons as defined under the Chemical Weapons Convention, and yes ... they do constitute weapons of mass destruction," Army Col. John Chu told the House Armed Services Committee.
The Chemical Weapons Convention is an arms control agreement which outlaws the production, stockpiling and use of chemical weapons. It was signed in 1993 and entered into force in 1997.
The munitions found contain sarin and mustard gases, Army Lt. Gen. Michael D. Maples, director of the
here is another
Iraq Uranium Canada | Hussein's uranium reaches Canada - Los Angeles Times
The removal of about 550 tons of "yellowcake" -- the seed material for high-grade nuclear enrichment -- was a significant step toward closing the books on Hussein's nuclear legacy. It also brought relief to U.S. and Iraqi authorities who had worried that the cache would fall into the hands of insurgents or Shiites hoping to advance Iran's alleged nuclear ambitions.
I mean where do you reach a point in which one says, well i was against the war because I am against wars, but I could see where there where issues with this entire situation after 9-11
The problem from day one with this event is there are all ways 2 sides of the story. Your side jumps up and down and says Bush lied and people died
Bush never lied
There was allot of things said that where not to the level that the press led people to believe
but he never really lied
WMDs where found
Saddam had nuclear ambitions
UN sanctions had been ignored
There where ties with Saddam and Al Qaeda
And him saying that Saddam had ties to 9-11 came from the same intel every-one had
Context of 'September 17, 2001: Bush Tells His Advisers ‘I Believe Iraq Was Involved’ in 9/11 Attacks'
he issue of possible Iraqi involvement in the 9/11 attacks is debated in a National Security Council meeting. According to journalist Bob Woodward, President Bush ends the debate by saying, “I believe Iraq was involved, but I’m not going to strike them now. I don’t have the evidence at this point.” Bush says wants to keep working on plans for military action in Iraq but indicates there will be plenty of time to do that later. Right now his focus is mainly on Afghanistan. [WOODWARD, 2002, PP. 99] At the time Bush says this, no evidence has emerged possibly linking Iraq to 9/11. One day later, an account of hijacker Mohamed Atta meeting an Iraqi agent in Prague will become known, but it will ultimately be discredited (see September 18, 2001).
Entity Tags: National Security Council, George W. Bush, Bob Woodward
Timeline Tags: Complete 911 Timeline, Events Leading to Iraq Invasion
September 18, 2001: Alleged Meeting Between Atta and Iraqi Diplomant Leaked to Press
Information about the alleged April 2001 meeting in Prague between 9/11 plotter Mohamed Atta and Iraqi diplomat Ahmed Khalil Ibrahim Samir al-Ani is leaked to the Associated Press, which reports, “A US official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the United States has received information from a foreign intelligence service that Mohamed Atta, a hijacker aboard one of the planes that slammed into the World Trade Center, met earlier this year in Europe with an Iraqi intelligence agent.” [ASSOCIATED PRESS, 9/18/2001; NEW YORK TIMES, 11/19/2003 SOURCES: UNNAMED US OFFICIAL] A long series of confirmations and refutations of this story will take place over the next several years, as some politicians try to make it a key argument to justify why the US should invade Iraq (see September 18, 2001-April 2007).
Entity Tags: Ahmed Khalil Ibrahim Samir al-Ani, Mohamed Atta
Timeline Tags: Complete 911 Timeline, Events Leading to Iraq Invasion
Context of 'September 18, 2001: Alleged Meeting Between Atta and Iraqi Diplomant Leaked to Press'
Now there is just a few examples of items that really happened
what now?
another lashing that has nothing to do with issues?
