That's what every cop says when they shoot someone, liar. I said it too every time I gassed some pos convict and I said it again when I pounded a convicts head into the ground. You racist haters really need to stop lying and twisting all the time.
Just because you don't possess the ability to understand what I'm saying doesn't make me a liar. Do you even know WHY "every cop says [I was in fear for my life] when they shoot someone"?
BECAUSE THEY RAYSISS THAT WHY
View attachment 262584
Well apparently, you're as ignorant as he is.
Well, isnt that what you're saying? Black people get shot by cops because the police are racist?
White people get shot by cops too, you know. But it doesn't make national headlines. Wonder why?
In
some cases, yes they are racist and they don't even try to hide the fact that they are. But the point that I was really trying to make is that there is a disparity between the way white suspects and black suspects are treated.
For instance, there is a poster here that actually laid out an argument of "what ifs" to justify the police shooting a black suspect in the back who was attempting to flee them based on the fleeing felon law & ruling. The police seem to automatically go to worse case scenario if the suspect is black in regards to how much of or he could be a "danger to the public", even if all he was doing was breaking into cars, or has warrants out for non-violent offenses.
In this news story that I posted, this guy not only committed an act of domestic violence against his ex-wife and murdered her, he was shooting at the police and was an
actual "fleeing felon" of the worse kind (besides having killed a law enforcement officer) yet apparently the police were never in "fear for their lives" to the point of needing to kill him to protect their own lives or the lives of others.
And I'm not saying that I wish they had (countrary to what some of the idiots here think), apparently they gave it their best shot, no pun intended, but the only mark on the guy when they pulled him out of his vehicle appears to have been inflicted by flying glass.
And the answer to the question that no one seems to have figured out yet is a
reasonable fear that one is under an
imminent threat (meaning happening right now) of egregious bodiy harm or death is the
legal threshold required for the use of deadly force in a self-defense scenario. Having someone shooting at you as a police officer would seem to fit that description, no?