Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
"If man evolved from monkeys and apes, why do we still have monkeys and apes?" -- George Carlin
Crusader Frank nnnnooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!
Don't get your opinions from comedians, leave that to the ignorant left.
Are you going to start quoting Bill Maher next???
Common ancestry didn't play a role in this research.
Many cancers are caused by viruses (cervical cancer, for instance). And viruses do, in fact, evolve by the exact same processes that all life evolves. Many other cancers are caused by genetic mutations, which is part of the basis for evolution. So to declare that common ancestry doesn't play a role is a meaningless statement.
Common ancestry didn't play a role in this research.
Many cancers are caused by viruses (cervical cancer, for instance). And viruses do, in fact, evolve by the exact same processes that all life evolves. Many other cancers are caused by genetic mutations, which is part of the basis for evolution. So to declare that common ancestry doesn't play a role is a meaningless statement.
For your hypothesis to be valid cancer cells would have to become another species like a tapeworm. LOL
The article doesn't support what you are claiming.
Cures for disease. For instance:
Giant leaps of evolution make cancer cells deadly - health - 23 January 2014 - New Scientist
More at the link.
That quite a big chunk of hyperbole there.
How so?
PredFan said:Evolution is the right answer, but converting creationists will in no way affect cancer research.
You don't know that. For all we know, a converted creationist could be so inspired by his revelation that he goes on and finds the cure of many diseases. After all, a former creationist had a major hand in the Human Genome project.
That quite a big chunk of hyperbole there.
How so?
PredFan said:Evolution is the right answer, but converting creationists will in no way affect cancer research.
You don't know that. For all we know, a converted creationist could be so inspired by his revelation that he goes on and finds the cure of many diseases. After all, a former creationist had a major hand in the Human Genome project.
Again with the hyperbole.
Yabba dabba do!So, erm, according to your wag, every thing came BEFORE creation. No doubt, you also believe that the Flintstones is a documentary.
Creation is the condensation of pure spirit, so yes, the elements are all there.
Unsupported claims are meaningless. You didn't know this? Huh.
Yabba dabba do!So, erm, according to your wag, every thing came BEFORE creation. No doubt, you also believe that the Flintstones is a documentary.
Creation is the condensation of pure spirit, so yes, the elements are all there.
Do they spirits have something?
Yabba dabba do!
Creation is the condensation of pure spirit, so yes, the elements are all there.
Unsupported claims are meaningless. You didn't know this? Huh.
I was there when it happened, but wasn't able to take notes at the time.
Stupid fuck.
Evolution is a fact
God is a theory
No, not fact, best guess.
Evolution occurs and is supported by mountains of scientific evidence
God is a guess and not supported by any scientific evidence
It came from the collapsing of the previous universe.
Evidence???
You, me, computers, the air we breathe, flowers, volcanoes, lions and tigers and bears oh my!
Science is not about proofs. It is about empirical evidence. The evidence in support of the theory of evolution is leading us towards more and more medical advancements, particularly in the field of disease prevention and cures to disease and genetic disorders. This is not merely an opinion. It is a demonstrable scientific fact.
Where is your empirical evidence where man made the leap from ape to humanoid? Where did it all begin? Big Bang theory? How did that big ball of mass that exploded come to be? If it even existed at all.
You seem to believe that somewhere in the past an ape suddenly became a human being via magic. That is probably a result of your biblical upbringing, but it has nothing to do with the theory of evolution. Evolution works on populations via natural selection. The big bang theory is irrelevant to the theory of evolution - you bringing it up is notrhing but creationist misdirection. The conversation, in case you have forgotten, is about how cancer evolves, and how knowledge of that evolution will likely lead to cures. Not only that, but this research demonstrates macroevolution. Do you have anything to add to that discussion?
Though military officers had to go to university? Maybe that's only the Navy but not the Army. Should look at what a scientific theory actually indicates. It isn't the same thing as when an individual says, "I have a theory about this thing." It's as true and reliable as it gets.
Scientific Hypothesis, Theory, Law Definitions
defs for scientific theory, laws, and hypothesis.
From your own reference: One definition of a theory is to say it's an accepted hypothesis.
So accept it if you must, I do not accept it as the singular explanation for how we came to be on this earth.
And you have a right to be as stupid as you like. Congratulations.
Evolution is a fact
God is a theory
No, not fact, best guess.
The fat man and little boy were also best guesses, and they ended WWII.
"If man evolved from monkeys and apes, why do we still have monkeys and apes?" -- George Carlin
Crusader Frank nnnnooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!
Don't get your opinions from comedians, leave that to the ignorant left.
Are you going to start quoting Bill Maher next???
To answer his question, we still have monkeys and apes because their present existence doesn't depend on whether or not we evolved from a common ancestor. But stay tuned, I suspect that many will be extinct at our hands in the near future.
Until the "theory" is proven, it isn't true.
Science is not about proofs. It is about empirical evidence. The evidence in support of the theory of evolution is leading us towards more and more medical advancements, particularly in the field of disease prevention and cures to disease and genetic disorders. This is not merely an opinion. It is a demonstrable scientific fact.
Until the "theory" is proven, it isn't true.
Science is not about proofs. It is about empirical evidence. The evidence in support of the theory of evolution is leading us towards more and more medical advancements, particularly in the field of disease prevention and cures to disease and genetic disorders. This is not merely an opinion. It is a demonstrable scientific fact.
Absolutely true. It's a shame the climatologists aren't held to the same high standard don't you think?
Crusader Frank nnnnooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!
Don't get your opinions from comedians, leave that to the ignorant left.
Are you going to start quoting Bill Maher next???
To answer his question, we still have monkeys and apes because their present existence doesn't depend on whether or not we evolved from a common ancestor. But stay tuned, I suspect that many will be extinct at our hands in the near future.
So are you admitting that the theory of evolution has holes in it?
No, not fact, best guess.
The fat man and little boy were also best guesses, and they ended WWII.
That's the best comparison you have to attempt to lend credit to the theory of evolution? That the theory of relativity is sound? I'm not arguing the theory of relativity. Are you saying the theory of relativity ended WWII? The conflict would have ended anyway. The theory of relativity enabled man to build a weapon that hastened the end of that conflict. Not sure how this supports the theory of evolution, but thanks for trying.
From your own reference: One definition of a theory is to say it's an accepted hypothesis.
So accept it if you must, I do not accept it as the singular explanation for how we came to be on this earth.
And you have a right to be as stupid as you like. Congratulations.
And you have the right to continue to be a fertilizer spreader.
Where is your empirical evidence where man made the leap from ape to humanoid? Where did it all begin? Big Bang theory? How did that big ball of mass that exploded come to be? If it even existed at all.
You seem to believe that somewhere in the past an ape suddenly became a human being via magic. That is probably a result of your biblical upbringing, but it has nothing to do with the theory of evolution. Evolution works on populations via natural selection. The big bang theory is irrelevant to the theory of evolution - you bringing it up is notrhing but creationist misdirection. The conversation, in case you have forgotten, is about how cancer evolves, and how knowledge of that evolution will likely lead to cures. Not only that, but this research demonstrates macroevolution. Do you have anything to add to that discussion?
so if we evolved from apes, which are all brown eyed, how did humans come to have blue, hazel, green eyes? mutation does not equate to evolution.
