DGS49
Diamond Member
(1) Meaningless game. No actual teams involved. Results don't count for anything.
(2) Based on meaningless performance - first half of the season, which is the less-important half and ignores the critical games at the end of the season.
(3) Voters are mainly 12-year-old boys. Who gives a shit what they think?
(4) It is truly a popularity contest, usually dominated by players on the large market teams.
(5) Voting ignores the input of knowledgeable baseball people (players and coaches).
(6) Coached like a Little League game; everybody gets in, hopefully gets a turn at bat. Managers could not care less who wins.
Imagine being named, say, the best Second Baseman in the league, based on a vote by MLB players, coaches, and managers. Now THAT would be something to be proud of. Compare that with being named to the current All-Star team. Pitchers are used little enough that it won't impact their place in the rotation on their actual teams. It is a joke.
Drop it. Give the players a few days off during the rest of the season. It is an un-funny joke.
(2) Based on meaningless performance - first half of the season, which is the less-important half and ignores the critical games at the end of the season.
(3) Voters are mainly 12-year-old boys. Who gives a shit what they think?
(4) It is truly a popularity contest, usually dominated by players on the large market teams.
(5) Voting ignores the input of knowledgeable baseball people (players and coaches).
(6) Coached like a Little League game; everybody gets in, hopefully gets a turn at bat. Managers could not care less who wins.
Imagine being named, say, the best Second Baseman in the league, based on a vote by MLB players, coaches, and managers. Now THAT would be something to be proud of. Compare that with being named to the current All-Star team. Pitchers are used little enough that it won't impact their place in the rotation on their actual teams. It is a joke.
Drop it. Give the players a few days off during the rest of the season. It is an un-funny joke.